Cristina García-Yubero

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and associated factors in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of a cohort of psoriasis patients in standard follow-up in a dermatology department from July 2008 to January 2024. Patients ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were included and classified into three groups according to the treatment received: group 1, biologics or small molecules with or without conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs); group 2, only csDMARDS; and group 3, non-pharmacological treatments. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. The prevalence of PsA was estimated with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The cumulative incidence of PsA was analyzed across groups, and logistic regression models were built. Results: The study population comprised 308 patients (67.2%, 22.7%, 10% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Differences between the groups were observed in severity of psoriasis, weight, smoking status, and dyslipidemia (p < 0.05). The prevalence of PsA was 11.7% (95% CI, 8.1–15.3), with most patients in group 1. This group had a higher risk of PsA following diagnosis of psoriasis or initiation of treatment. Belonging to groups 2 and 3 had a smaller effect than belonging to group 1 in the development of PsA; nail involvement and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were associated with development of PsA (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence estimate was lower than previous estimates, probably owing to the increased use of biologics. Nail involvement and OSA were associated with PsA.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and associated fac-tors in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods: Retrospective, single-center study of a cohort of psoriasis patients in stand-ard follow-up in a dermatology department from July 2008 to January 2024. Patients ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were included and classified into 3 groups according to the treatment received: group 1, biologics or small molecules with or without conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs); group 2, only csDMARDS; and group 3, non-pharmacological treatments. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. The prevalence of PsA was estimated with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The cumulative incidence of PsA was analyzed across groups, and logistic regression models were built. Results: The study population comprised 308 patients (67.2%, 22.7%, 10% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Dif-ferences between the groups were observed in severity of psoriasis, weight, smoking status, and dyslipidemia (p< 0.05). The prevalence of PsA was 11.7% (95% CI, 8.1-15.3), with most patients in group 1. This group had a high-er risk of PsA following diagnosis of psoriasis or initiation of treatment. Belonging to groups 2 and 3 had a smaller effect than belonging to group 1 in the development of PsA; nail involvement and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were associated with development of PsA (p< 0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence estimate was lower than previous estimates, probably owing to the increased use of biologics. Not requiring biologics for disease control had less effect on development of PsA. Nail involvement and OSA were associated with PsA.

Background. The risk of herpes zoster reactivation is increased in immunocompromised patients, especially in those with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) treatment. The recombinant subunit herpes zoster vaccine (RZV) is a non-live vaccine, recently approved for this subgroup of patients, which shows high rates of vaccine effectiveness, with few adverse effects reported in clinical trials. Purpose. The aim of this real-world study was to determine the immunogenicity and safety of RZV in IMID patients on JAKi treatment. Methods. The increase in the concentration of anti-gE antibody for varicella zoster virus post-vaccination, compared to the pre-vaccination concentration, was analyzed to test the humoral immune response. Adverse effects after the first and second vaccine doses were registered. Results. In total, 49 patients were analyzed, and a fourfold increase in antibody concentration was achieved in almost 40% of subjects, with only one serious local adverse effect. Discussion. The resulting immunogenicity was lower than that observed in clinical trials, probably due to the presence of immune disease and immunosuppressive treatment, and to the fact that this was a real-world study. No differences in response according to age, previous virus zoster reactivation, or concomitant treatments were found. Conclusions. RZV was well tolerated and reached the immune response objective in 40% of patients. These results reinforce the importance of including RZV vaccination for immunosuppressed patients. Real-world studies regarding vaccine effectiveness are still needed in order to gain a full understanding of the response to RZV in this group of patients.

Objective: To assess the use of resources and the costs associated with following up patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus after discontinuation of an antiretroviral treatment and initiation of a new one due to a lack of effectiveness or unacceptable toxicity, as compared to the costs involved in the routine follow-up of patients on antiretroviral treatment, from the Spanish National Health System perspective. Method: The use of resources (clinical tests, medical visits, and hospital pharmacy visits) associated with following three profiles of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (stable ones, those discontinuing an existing antiretroviral treatment and being switched to a new one due to a lack of effectiveness, and those discontinuing an existing antiretroviral treatment and being switched to a new one due to unacceptable toxicity) was identified, based on clinical practice guidelines and the findings of a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 5). The experts agreed on the main adverse events leading to discontinuation, classifying them into gastrointestinal, renal, osseous, musculoskeletal, dermatological, hepatic, lipid profile-related, neuropsychiatric and sexual alterations. Unit costs were identified from official healthcare costs databases. The cost ((sic), 2020) of following up each patient profile was estimated, excluding the cost of the antiretroviral treatment itself, with a time horizon of two years. Results: The per-patient cost of following up stable patients over two years was estimated at (sic)4,148 (tests: (sic)2,293; visits: (sic)1,855). Patient follow-up after discontinuation of an existing antiretroviral treatment and initiation of a different one due to a lack of effectiveness was estimated at (sic)5,434 (tests: (sic)2,777; visits: (sic)2,657). The cost of follow-up after discontinuation of an existing regimen and initiation of a new one due to unacceptable toxicity varied according to the adverse event prompting the switch, ranging from (sic)4,690 for lipid profile dysregulation, to (sic)5,304, for musculoskeletal alterations. In this patient profile, the cost of tests ranged from (sic)2,403 to (sic)3,017, and that of visits from (sic)2,287 to (sic)2,842. Conclusions: The cost associated with following up of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus after discontinuation of an existing antiretroviral regimen and initiation of a new one is higher than that of routine follow-up, without taking the cost of drugs into account. The treatment discontinuation rate is a relevant factor when selecting the most appropriate therapy for each patient.