Mihaela Munteanu Pila
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Mihaela Munteanu Pila has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Adrian Roșu
Faculty of Sciences and Environment, European Centre of Excellence for the Environment, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Domneasca Street, no. 111, 800201 Galati, Romania
1 shared publication - Bogdan Roșu
“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Str. Domnească 111, Galați 800008, Romania; RADO-Galați, REXDAN Research Infrastructure, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galați, 98 George Coșbuc Street, 800385 Galați, Romania; , Galati, Romania, Romania
1 shared publication - Gabriel Murariu
Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, Faculty of Sciences and Environmental, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, Domneasca Street no. 47, 800008 Galati, Romania
1 shared publication - George Danut Mocanu
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania
1 shared publication - Iuliana Condulet1 shared publication
- Maxim Arseni
REXDAN Research Infrastructure, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 98 George Cosbuc Street, 800385 Galati, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Universitatea Dunarea de Jos din Galati in Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies
- Vol. 1 (1) , 46-55
Agricultural Production of Galati County. Aspects Related to Grain Crops
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Universitatea Dunarea de Jos din Galati in Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies
- Vol. 1 (1) , 46-55
Agricultural Production of Galati County. Aspects Related to Grain Crops
- Open Access
- 10 August 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 11 (16) , 3471
Enhancing the Performance of a Simulated WWTP: Comparative Analysis of Control Strategies for the BSM2 Model
This study aimed to improve the performance of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) simulated with Benchmark Model No. 2 (BSM2). To achieve this objective, three control strategies were implemented and tested. The first control strategy aimed to maintain the concentration of nitrate and nitrite nitrogen (SNO) by controlling the external carbon flowrate (strategy A1), and the second control strategy aimed to maintain the ammonia and ammonium nitrogen (SNH) at a desired level with the use of a cascade controller (strategy A2). The third strategy was applied to control the total suspended solids (TSS) (strategy A3). Combinations of these strategies were considered (B1, B2, and B3 strategies), as well as the use of all three together (strategy C1). The control strategies presented in this paper were compared to the default control strategy of BSM2 to validate and identify the one that provided the best performance. The results revealed that the B1 strategy was the most environmentally friendly, while C1 obtained the highest overall performance. Several Monte Carlo simulations were performed for the validated control strategies, to identify the optimal setpoint values. For the C1 strategy, a second method of optimization regarding polynomial interpolation was considered. The applied optimization methods provided the optimal reference values for the PI (proportional integral) controllers.
- 10 August 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 11 (16) , 3471
Open AccessEnhancing the Performance of a Simulated WWTP: Comparative Analysis of Control Strategies for the BSM2 Model
This study aimed to improve the performance of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) simulated with Benchmark Model No. 2 (BSM2). To achieve this objective, three control strategies were implemented and tested. The first control strategy aimed to maintain the concentration of nitrate and nitrite nitrogen (SNO) by controlling the external carbon flowrate (strategy A1), and the second control strategy aimed to maintain the ammonia and ammonium nitrogen (SNH) at a desired level with the use of a cascade controller (strategy A2). The third strategy was applied to control the total suspended solids (TSS) (strategy A3). Combinations of these strategies were considered (B1, B2, and B3 strategies), as well as the use of all three together (strategy C1). The control strategies presented in this paper were compared to the default control strategy of BSM2 to validate and identify the one that provided the best performance. The results revealed that the B1 strategy was the most environmentally friendly, while C1 obtained the highest overall performance. Several Monte Carlo simulations were performed for the validated control strategies, to identify the optimal setpoint values. For the C1 strategy, a second method of optimization regarding polynomial interpolation was considered. The applied optimization methods provided the optimal reference values for the PI (proportional integral) controllers.