Georgiana Carmen Filimon
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Georgiana Carmen Filimon has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Marius Rus
Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania
3 shared publications - Adriana Ioana Ardelean
Clinical County Emergency Hospital Bihor, 410169 Oradea, Romania
2 shared publications - Felicia Liana Andronie-Cioara
Department of Psycho Neuroscience and Recovery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania
2 shared publications - Adrian Gheorghe Osiceanu
Department of Morphological Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1st December Square 10, 410073 Oradea, Romania
1 shared publication - Adriana Ioana Ardelean
Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania
1 shared publication - Alina Stanca Osiceanu
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Acute Myocardial Infarction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognosis—A Systematic Review
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was a global pandemic with high mortality and morbidity that led to an increased health burden all over the world. Although the virus mostly affects the pulmonary tract, cardiovascular implications are often observed among COVID-19 patients and are predictive of poor outcomes. Increased values of myocardial biomarkers such as troponin I or NT-proBNP were proven to be risk factors for respiratory failure. Although the risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) was greater in the acute phase of COVID-19, there were lower rates of hospitalization for ACSs, due to patients’ hesitation in presenting at the hospital. Hospitalized ACSs patients with COVID-19 infection had a prolonged symptom-to-first-medical-contact time, and longer door-to-balloon time. The mechanisms of myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients are still not entirely clear; however, the most frequently implicated factors include the downregulation of ACE2 receptors, endothelial dysfunction, pro-coagulant status, and increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognosis of COVID-19 survivors that presented an acute myocardial infarction, by reviewing existing data. The importance of the association between this infectious disease and myocardial infarction arises from the increased mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and AMI (10–76%, compared with 4.6% for NSTEMI patients and 7% for STEMI patients without COVID-19). The literature review showed an increased risk of cardiovascular events in COVID-19 survivors compared with the general population, even after the acute phase of the disease, with poorer long-term outcomes.
Open AccessAcute Myocardial Infarction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognosis—A Systematic Review
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was a global pandemic with high mortality and morbidity that led to an increased health burden all over the world. Although the virus mostly affects the pulmonary tract, cardiovascular implications are often observed among COVID-19 patients and are predictive of poor outcomes. Increased values of myocardial biomarkers such as troponin I or NT-proBNP were proven to be risk factors for respiratory failure. Although the risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) was greater in the acute phase of COVID-19, there were lower rates of hospitalization for ACSs, due to patients’ hesitation in presenting at the hospital. Hospitalized ACSs patients with COVID-19 infection had a prolonged symptom-to-first-medical-contact time, and longer door-to-balloon time. The mechanisms of myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients are still not entirely clear; however, the most frequently implicated factors include the downregulation of ACE2 receptors, endothelial dysfunction, pro-coagulant status, and increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognosis of COVID-19 survivors that presented an acute myocardial infarction, by reviewing existing data. The importance of the association between this infectious disease and myocardial infarction arises from the increased mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and AMI (10–76%, compared with 4.6% for NSTEMI patients and 7% for STEMI patients without COVID-19). The literature review showed an increased risk of cardiovascular events in COVID-19 survivors compared with the general population, even after the acute phase of the disease, with poorer long-term outcomes.
- Open Access
- 27 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Long-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Patients with Myocardial Infarction During Covid Pandemic
Coronavirus infection disease -2019 (COVID-19) was a global pandemic with high mortality and morbidity, that lead to an increased health burned all over the world. Although the virus affects mostly pulmonary tract, cardiovascular implications were often among COVID-19 positive patients, and are predictive for poor outcomes. Increased values of myocardial biomarkers such as Troponin I or NT-proBNP were proven to be risk factors for respiratory failure (26). Although the risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) was greater in acute-phase of COVID-19, there were lower rates of hospitalization for ACS, due to patient’s hesitation for presenting at the hospital (22). Hospitalized ACS patients with COVID-19 infection, had a prolonged symptom-to-first medical contact time, and longer door-to-balloon time. The mechanisms of myocardial injurie in COVID -19 patients are not still not clear, most often is incriminated: the down-regulation of ACE2 inhibitors, endothelial disfunction, pro-coagulant status, increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 survivors that presented an acute myocardial infarction by reviewing existing data.
- 27 September 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessLong-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Patients with Myocardial Infarction During Covid Pandemic
Coronavirus infection disease -2019 (COVID-19) was a global pandemic with high mortality and morbidity, that lead to an increased health burned all over the world. Although the virus affects mostly pulmonary tract, cardiovascular implications were often among COVID-19 positive patients, and are predictive for poor outcomes. Increased values of myocardial biomarkers such as Troponin I or NT-proBNP were proven to be risk factors for respiratory failure (26). Although the risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) was greater in acute-phase of COVID-19, there were lower rates of hospitalization for ACS, due to patient’s hesitation for presenting at the hospital (22). Hospitalized ACS patients with COVID-19 infection, had a prolonged symptom-to-first medical contact time, and longer door-to-balloon time. The mechanisms of myocardial injurie in COVID -19 patients are not still not clear, most often is incriminated: the down-regulation of ACE2 inhibitors, endothelial disfunction, pro-coagulant status, increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 survivors that presented an acute myocardial infarction by reviewing existing data.
- Open Access
- 11 August 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 11 (8) , 2255
T and Small Protrusion (TAP) Technique in Bifurcations: Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients after COVID-19 Pneumonia
Ischemic coronary artery disease in all its forms remains the main cause of death worldwide. Coronary artery bifurcation lesions are a challenge because of their complexity and possible complications. The goal of treating bifurcation lesions is the optimal revascularization of the main vessel without compromising the side branch. Although the study of bifurcation stenting aims to keep the side branch viable, the outcomes regarding major acute cardiovascular events and survivability are related to the optimal treatment of the main vessel. There are many trials that have tried to evaluate the best technique to use with respect to bifurcation lesions, and early studies support provisional stenting as the election treatment. More recent trials highlighted the superior outcomes of the double kissing crush technique used on unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, two-stent techniques were avoided because of the prolonged procedural time in unstable patients, with high risks of complications. We present the case of a 53-year-old woman with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension, active cancer, post-COVID-19 state) and acute antero-lateral myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary intervention with the use of the TAP technique for stenting the bifurcation culprit coronary lesion (left anterior descendent artery and first diagonal artery).
- 11 August 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomedicines
- Vol. 11 (8) , 2255
Open AccessT and Small Protrusion (TAP) Technique in Bifurcations: Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients after COVID-19 Pneumonia
Ischemic coronary artery disease in all its forms remains the main cause of death worldwide. Coronary artery bifurcation lesions are a challenge because of their complexity and possible complications. The goal of treating bifurcation lesions is the optimal revascularization of the main vessel without compromising the side branch. Although the study of bifurcation stenting aims to keep the side branch viable, the outcomes regarding major acute cardiovascular events and survivability are related to the optimal treatment of the main vessel. There are many trials that have tried to evaluate the best technique to use with respect to bifurcation lesions, and early studies support provisional stenting as the election treatment. More recent trials highlighted the superior outcomes of the double kissing crush technique used on unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, two-stent techniques were avoided because of the prolonged procedural time in unstable patients, with high risks of complications. We present the case of a 53-year-old woman with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension, active cancer, post-COVID-19 state) and acute antero-lateral myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary intervention with the use of the TAP technique for stenting the bifurcation culprit coronary lesion (left anterior descendent artery and first diagonal artery).