Alexandra Bartolomucci
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alexandra Bartolomucci has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jonathan Cools-Lartigue
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
2 shared publications - Julia Valdemarin Burnier
Cancer Research Program Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada
2 shared publications Ariane Brassard
Cancer Research Program Research Institute of McGill University Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada
1 shared publication- Benjamin N. Forgie
Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
1 shared publication Betty Giannias
Cancer Research Program Research Institute of McGill University Health Center Montreal Quebec Canada
1 shared publicationDaniela Quail
The Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Cell-Free DNA Release Kinetics and Fragmentation Reflect Treatment Response and Resistance In Vitro
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a clinically valuable biomarker for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and minimal residual disease assessment. Despite its growing clinical utility, the biological mechanisms governing ctDNA release remain incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to investigate how chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity and chemoresistance influence the kinetics and fragmentation patterns of cfDNA released by cancer cells in vitro. Methods: Human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (FLO-1, OE19) cell lines were used to investigate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) release and fragmentation in vitro. Cancer cells were treated with chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil), and cfDNA released into the culture medium was quantified as total cfDNA by Qubit fluorometry and mutation-specific cfDNA by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). A cisplatin-resistant OE19 model was generated to directly compare cfDNA release kinetics between chemosensitive and chemoresistant cells. Fragment size distributions were determined and evaluated alongside cell death mechanisms assessed by flow cytometry. Results: cfDNA release correlated positively with viable tumor cell number across all cell lines. Chemotherapy increased per-cell cfDNA release in all cell lines. Chemosensitive OE19 cells exhibited significantly higher cfDNA release compared to chemoresistant OE19 cells following cisplatin exposure, with distinct temporal release kinetics. Additionally, chemotherapy treatment induced a shift toward the release of larger DNA fragments in both chemosensitive and resistant cells. This was accompanied by changes in PI-positive and Annexin V/PI double-positive cell populations, suggesting altered cell death processes following cisplatin treatment. Conclusions: Chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity significantly influences cfDNA release kinetics and fragmentation patterns, with distinct effects in chemosensitive and chemoresistant cancer cells. These findings provide mechanistic insight into tumor-derived DNA release biology and may have important implications for the interpretation, timing, and standardization of liquid biopsy testing during treatment. Furthermore, they establish in vitro cancer models as a valuable platform for studying cfDNA dynamics and informing preclinical therapeutic development.
Open AccessCell-Free DNA Release Kinetics and Fragmentation Reflect Treatment Response and Resistance In Vitro
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a clinically valuable biomarker for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and minimal residual disease assessment. Despite its growing clinical utility, the biological mechanisms governing ctDNA release remain incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to investigate how chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity and chemoresistance influence the kinetics and fragmentation patterns of cfDNA released by cancer cells in vitro. Methods: Human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (FLO-1, OE19) cell lines were used to investigate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) release and fragmentation in vitro. Cancer cells were treated with chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil), and cfDNA released into the culture medium was quantified as total cfDNA by Qubit fluorometry and mutation-specific cfDNA by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). A cisplatin-resistant OE19 model was generated to directly compare cfDNA release kinetics between chemosensitive and chemoresistant cells. Fragment size distributions were determined and evaluated alongside cell death mechanisms assessed by flow cytometry. Results: cfDNA release correlated positively with viable tumor cell number across all cell lines. Chemotherapy increased per-cell cfDNA release in all cell lines. Chemosensitive OE19 cells exhibited significantly higher cfDNA release compared to chemoresistant OE19 cells following cisplatin exposure, with distinct temporal release kinetics. Additionally, chemotherapy treatment induced a shift toward the release of larger DNA fragments in both chemosensitive and resistant cells. This was accompanied by changes in PI-positive and Annexin V/PI double-positive cell populations, suggesting altered cell death processes following cisplatin treatment. Conclusions: Chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity significantly influences cfDNA release kinetics and fragmentation patterns, with distinct effects in chemosensitive and chemoresistant cancer cells. These findings provide mechanistic insight into tumor-derived DNA release biology and may have important implications for the interpretation, timing, and standardization of liquid biopsy testing during treatment. Furthermore, they establish in vitro cancer models as a valuable platform for studying cfDNA dynamics and informing preclinical therapeutic development.
- Open Access
- 10 August 2023
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Vol. 12 (8) , e12341
Tumour extracellular vesicles induce neutrophil extracellular traps to promote lymph node metastasis
Lymph nodes (LNs) are frequently the first sites of metastasis. Currently, the only prognostic LN assessment is determining metastatic status. However, there is evidence suggesting that LN metastasis is facilitated by the formation of a pre‐metastatic niche induced by tumour derived extracellular vehicles (EVs). Therefore, it is important to detect and modify the LN environmental changes. Earlier work has demonstrated that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) can sequester and promote distant metastasis. Here, we first confirmed that LN NETs are associated with reduced patient survival. Next, we demonstrated that NETs deposition precedes LN metastasis and NETs inhibition diminishes LN metastases in animal models. Furthermore, we discovered that EVs are essential to the formation of LN NETs. Finally, we showed that lymphatic endothelial cells secrete CXCL8/2 in response to EVs inducing NETs formation and the promotion of LN metastasis. Our findings reveal the role of EV‐induced NETs in LN metastasis and provide potential immunotherapeutic vulnerabilities that may occur early in the metastatic cascade.
- 10 August 2023
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
- Vol. 12 (8) , e12341
Open AccessTumour extracellular vesicles induce neutrophil extracellular traps to promote lymph node metastasis
Lymph nodes (LNs) are frequently the first sites of metastasis. Currently, the only prognostic LN assessment is determining metastatic status. However, there is evidence suggesting that LN metastasis is facilitated by the formation of a pre‐metastatic niche induced by tumour derived extracellular vehicles (EVs). Therefore, it is important to detect and modify the LN environmental changes. Earlier work has demonstrated that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) can sequester and promote distant metastasis. Here, we first confirmed that LN NETs are associated with reduced patient survival. Next, we demonstrated that NETs deposition precedes LN metastasis and NETs inhibition diminishes LN metastases in animal models. Furthermore, we discovered that EVs are essential to the formation of LN NETs. Finally, we showed that lymphatic endothelial cells secrete CXCL8/2 in response to EVs inducing NETs formation and the promotion of LN metastasis. Our findings reveal the role of EV‐induced NETs in LN metastasis and provide potential immunotherapeutic vulnerabilities that may occur early in the metastatic cascade.