Dongsun Kim
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Dongsun Kim has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anil Koyuncu
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) University of Luxembourg Luxembourg
2 shared publications - Jacques Klein
University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
2 shared publications - Kui Liu
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., China
2 shared publications - Martin Monperrus
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
2 shared publications - Yves Le Traon
University of Luxembourg
2 shared publications Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
SnT University of Luxembourg KTH Royal Institute of Technology
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited Papers
- 14 March 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Empirical Software Engineering
- Vol. 25 (3) , 1980-2024
FixMiner: Mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair
- 14 March 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Empirical Software Engineering
- Vol. 25 (3) , 1980-2024
Top Cited PapersFixMiner: Mining relevant fix patterns for automated program repair
- Open Access
FixMiner: Mining Relevant Fix Patterns for Automated Program Repair
Patching is a common activity in software development. It is generally performed on a source code base to address bugs or add new functionalities. In this context, given the recurrence of bugs across projects, the associated similar patches can be leveraged to extract generic fix actions. While the literature includes various approaches leveraging similarity among patches to guide program repair, these approaches often do not yield fix patterns that are tractable and reusable as actionable input to APR systems. In this paper, we propose a systematic and automated approach to mining relevant and actionable fix patterns based on an iterative clustering strategy applied to atomic changes within patches. The goal of FixMiner is thus to infer separate and reusable fix patterns that can be leveraged in other patch generation systems. Our technique, FixMiner, leverages Rich Edit Script which is a specialized tree structure of the edit scripts that captures the AST-level context of the code changes. FixMiner uses different tree representations of Rich Edit Scripts for each round of clustering to identify similar changes. These are abstract syntax trees, edit actions trees, and code context trees. We have evaluated FixMiner on thousands of software patches collected from open source projects. Preliminary results show that we are able to mine accurate patterns, efficiently exploiting change information in Rich Edit Scripts. We further integrated the mined patterns to an automated program repair prototype, PARFixMiner, with which we are able to correctly fix 26 bugs of the Defects4J benchmark. Beyond this quantitative performance, we show that the mined fix patterns are sufficiently relevant to produce patches with a high probability of correctness: 81% of PARFixMiner's generated plausible patches are correct.
Open AccessFixMiner: Mining Relevant Fix Patterns for Automated Program Repair
Patching is a common activity in software development. It is generally performed on a source code base to address bugs or add new functionalities. In this context, given the recurrence of bugs across projects, the associated similar patches can be leveraged to extract generic fix actions. While the literature includes various approaches leveraging similarity among patches to guide program repair, these approaches often do not yield fix patterns that are tractable and reusable as actionable input to APR systems. In this paper, we propose a systematic and automated approach to mining relevant and actionable fix patterns based on an iterative clustering strategy applied to atomic changes within patches. The goal of FixMiner is thus to infer separate and reusable fix patterns that can be leveraged in other patch generation systems. Our technique, FixMiner, leverages Rich Edit Script which is a specialized tree structure of the edit scripts that captures the AST-level context of the code changes. FixMiner uses different tree representations of Rich Edit Scripts for each round of clustering to identify similar changes. These are abstract syntax trees, edit actions trees, and code context trees. We have evaluated FixMiner on thousands of software patches collected from open source projects. Preliminary results show that we are able to mine accurate patterns, efficiently exploiting change information in Rich Edit Scripts. We further integrated the mined patterns to an automated program repair prototype, PARFixMiner, with which we are able to correctly fix 26 bugs of the Defects4J benchmark. Beyond this quantitative performance, we show that the mined fix patterns are sufficiently relevant to produce patches with a high probability of correctness: 81% of PARFixMiner's generated plausible patches are correct.