Matheus Luquirini Penteado dos Santos
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Matheus Luquirini Penteado dos Santos has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Flavia Regina Oliveira de Barros
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia - PPZ UTFPR/Unioeste, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil; Coordenação de Engenharia de Bioprocessos e Biotecnologia, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil
2 shared publications - Frederico Márcio Corrêa Vieira
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia - PPZ UTFPR/Unioeste, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil
2 shared publications - Julia Morgana Vieira Dada
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia - PPZ UTFPR/Unioeste, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil
2 shared publications - Letícia Pinto
Coordenação de Engenharia de Bioprocessos e Biotecnologia, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil
2 shared publications - Ana Paula Schneiders Dani
Coordination of the Bioprocess and Biotechnology Engineering, Federal University of Technology—Paraná (UTFPR), Dois Vizinhos 85660-000, Brazil
1 shared publication - Bruno Streher Matté
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia - PPZ UTFPR/Unioeste, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, PR, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 29 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Theriogenology
- Vol. 256, 117852
Effect of astaxanthin supplementation on Holstein cows subjected to IVP of embryos during the summer
- 29 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Theriogenology
- Vol. 256, 117852
Effect of astaxanthin supplementation on Holstein cows subjected to IVP of embryos during the summer
- Open Access
Placental Development and Physiological Changes in Pregnant Ewes in Silvopastoral and Open Pasture Systems during the Summer
This study aimed to analyze the reproductive and physiological changes in ewes subjected to heat stress during pregnancy at UTFPR-Brazil. Twenty-four pregnant crossbred ewes were kept in a silvopastoral system (SP) or an open pasture system (OP) throughout the final trimester of pregnancy. Both systems were stressful, but the SP system had lower air temperature than the OP system (26.0 ± 0.38 and 26.9 ± 0.41 °C, respectively; p = 0.0288). Moreover, the radiant thermal load of the two groups presented a difference of 34 Wm−2 (p = 0.0288), and the grass temperature was also lower in the SP system compared to that in the OP system (23.4 ± 0.37 and 25.6 ± 0.44 °C, respectively; p = 0.0043). The respiratory and heart rates of animals from the OP group were higher than those from the SP group (p < 0.001), but no difference was observed in the mobilization of white blood cells (p = 0.4777), and the neutrophil count was only affected by time (p < 0.0001). As regards placental biometry, placentas in twin pregnancies had a greater membrane area (p = 0.0223), but no differences between the systems were observed in placental weight (p = 0.1522) and the number of cotyledons (p = 0.5457). We concluded that the type of rearing system used affects the thermal comfort of pregnant ewes, and that an SP system can offer more amenable microclimatic conditions, which result in greater comfort for the ewes.
Open AccessPlacental Development and Physiological Changes in Pregnant Ewes in Silvopastoral and Open Pasture Systems during the Summer
This study aimed to analyze the reproductive and physiological changes in ewes subjected to heat stress during pregnancy at UTFPR-Brazil. Twenty-four pregnant crossbred ewes were kept in a silvopastoral system (SP) or an open pasture system (OP) throughout the final trimester of pregnancy. Both systems were stressful, but the SP system had lower air temperature than the OP system (26.0 ± 0.38 and 26.9 ± 0.41 °C, respectively; p = 0.0288). Moreover, the radiant thermal load of the two groups presented a difference of 34 Wm−2 (p = 0.0288), and the grass temperature was also lower in the SP system compared to that in the OP system (23.4 ± 0.37 and 25.6 ± 0.44 °C, respectively; p = 0.0043). The respiratory and heart rates of animals from the OP group were higher than those from the SP group (p < 0.001), but no difference was observed in the mobilization of white blood cells (p = 0.4777), and the neutrophil count was only affected by time (p < 0.0001). As regards placental biometry, placentas in twin pregnancies had a greater membrane area (p = 0.0223), but no differences between the systems were observed in placental weight (p = 0.1522) and the number of cotyledons (p = 0.5457). We concluded that the type of rearing system used affects the thermal comfort of pregnant ewes, and that an SP system can offer more amenable microclimatic conditions, which result in greater comfort for the ewes.