Chen Zhuo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Chen Zhuo has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chengwei Zeng
Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
4 shared publications - Haoquan Liu
Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
4 shared publications - Yunjie Zhao
Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University , Wuhan 430079
4 shared publications - Jiaming Gao
Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2 shared publications - Huiwen Wang
School of Physics and Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
1 shared publication - Rui Yang
Institute of Biophysics and Department of Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 21 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1593
Advances in Methods for Accurate Prediction of RNA–Small Molecule Binding Sites: From Isolated to AI-Integrated Strategies
Predicting RNA–small molecule binding sites is essential for developing RNA-targeted drugs. Identifying these sites experimentally is often costly, making computational methods essential for drug discovery. While traditional approaches rely on limited information, recent AI advancements allow the integration of diverse features, improving prediction accuracy. As methods for predicting RNA–small molecule binding sites continue to evolve, this review provides a timely overview of recent developments. It systematically traces the evolution from physics-based, isolated strategies to AI-integrated approaches, explains the fundamental principles behind different features, compares the tendencies of various features between binding and non-binding sites, evaluates the performance of approaches using different feature combinations on various test sets, and outlines remaining opportunities and challenges, offering guidance for researchers aiming for higher prediction accuracy.
- 21 October 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Pharmaceuticals
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1593
Open AccessAdvances in Methods for Accurate Prediction of RNA–Small Molecule Binding Sites: From Isolated to AI-Integrated Strategies
Predicting RNA–small molecule binding sites is essential for developing RNA-targeted drugs. Identifying these sites experimentally is often costly, making computational methods essential for drug discovery. While traditional approaches rely on limited information, recent AI advancements allow the integration of diverse features, improving prediction accuracy. As methods for predicting RNA–small molecule binding sites continue to evolve, this review provides a timely overview of recent developments. It systematically traces the evolution from physics-based, isolated strategies to AI-integrated approaches, explains the fundamental principles behind different features, compares the tendencies of various features between binding and non-binding sites, evaluates the performance of approaches using different feature combinations on various test sets, and outlines remaining opportunities and challenges, offering guidance for researchers aiming for higher prediction accuracy.
- Open Access
Advances and Mechanisms of RNA–Ligand Interaction Predictions
The diversity and complexity of RNA include sequence, secondary structure, and tertiary structure characteristics. These elements are crucial for RNA’s specific recognition of other molecules. With advancements in biotechnology, RNA–ligand structures allow researchers to utilize experimental data to uncover the mechanisms of complex interactions. However, determining the structures of these complexes experimentally can be technically challenging and often results in low-resolution data. Many machine learning computational approaches have recently emerged to learn multiscale-level RNA features to predict the interactions. Predicting interactions remains an unexplored area. Therefore, studying RNA–ligand interactions is essential for understanding biological processes. In this review, we analyze the interaction characteristics of RNA–ligand complexes by examining RNA’s sequence, secondary structure, and tertiary structure. Our goal is to clarify how RNA specifically recognizes ligands. Additionally, we systematically discuss advancements in computational methods for predicting interactions and to guide future research directions. We aim to inspire the creation of more reliable RNA–ligand interaction prediction tools.
Open AccessAdvances and Mechanisms of RNA–Ligand Interaction Predictions
The diversity and complexity of RNA include sequence, secondary structure, and tertiary structure characteristics. These elements are crucial for RNA’s specific recognition of other molecules. With advancements in biotechnology, RNA–ligand structures allow researchers to utilize experimental data to uncover the mechanisms of complex interactions. However, determining the structures of these complexes experimentally can be technically challenging and often results in low-resolution data. Many machine learning computational approaches have recently emerged to learn multiscale-level RNA features to predict the interactions. Predicting interactions remains an unexplored area. Therefore, studying RNA–ligand interactions is essential for understanding biological processes. In this review, we analyze the interaction characteristics of RNA–ligand complexes by examining RNA’s sequence, secondary structure, and tertiary structure. Our goal is to clarify how RNA specifically recognizes ligands. Additionally, we systematically discuss advancements in computational methods for predicting interactions and to guide future research directions. We aim to inspire the creation of more reliable RNA–ligand interaction prediction tools.
- Open Access
- 1 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 14 (10) , 1245
Advances and Challenges in Scoring Functions for RNA–Protein Complex Structure Prediction
RNA–protein complexes play a crucial role in cellular functions, providing insights into cellular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. However, experimental determination of these complex structures is often time-consuming and resource-intensive, and it rarely yields high-resolution data. Many computational approaches have been developed to predict RNA–protein complex structures in recent years. Despite these advances, achieving accurate and high-resolution predictions remains a formidable challenge, primarily due to the limitations inherent in current RNA–protein scoring functions. These scoring functions are critical tools for evaluating and interpreting RNA–protein interactions. This review comprehensively explores the latest advancements in scoring functions for RNA–protein docking, delving into the fundamental principles underlying various approaches, including coarse-grained knowledge-based, all-atom knowledge-based, and machine-learning-based methods. We critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing scoring functions, providing a detailed performance assessment. Considering the significant progress demonstrated by machine learning techniques, we discuss emerging trends and propose future research directions to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of scoring functions in RNA–protein complex prediction. We aim to inspire the development of more sophisticated and reliable computational tools in this rapidly evolving field.
- 1 October 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Biomolecules
- Vol. 14 (10) , 1245
Open AccessAdvances and Challenges in Scoring Functions for RNA–Protein Complex Structure Prediction
RNA–protein complexes play a crucial role in cellular functions, providing insights into cellular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. However, experimental determination of these complex structures is often time-consuming and resource-intensive, and it rarely yields high-resolution data. Many computational approaches have been developed to predict RNA–protein complex structures in recent years. Despite these advances, achieving accurate and high-resolution predictions remains a formidable challenge, primarily due to the limitations inherent in current RNA–protein scoring functions. These scoring functions are critical tools for evaluating and interpreting RNA–protein interactions. This review comprehensively explores the latest advancements in scoring functions for RNA–protein docking, delving into the fundamental principles underlying various approaches, including coarse-grained knowledge-based, all-atom knowledge-based, and machine-learning-based methods. We critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing scoring functions, providing a detailed performance assessment. Considering the significant progress demonstrated by machine learning techniques, we discuss emerging trends and propose future research directions to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of scoring functions in RNA–protein complex prediction. We aim to inspire the development of more sophisticated and reliable computational tools in this rapidly evolving field.
- Open Access
- 13 March 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 24 (6) , 5497
RPflex: A Coarse-Grained Network Model for RNA Pocket Flexibility Study
RNA regulates various biological processes, such as gene regulation, RNA splicing, and intracellular signal transduction. RNA’s conformational dynamics play crucial roles in performing its diverse functions. Thus, it is essential to explore the flexibility characteristics of RNA, especially pocket flexibility. Here, we propose a computational approach, RPflex, to analyze pocket flexibility using the coarse-grained network model. We first clustered 3154 pockets into 297 groups by similarity calculation based on the coarse-grained lattice model. Then, we introduced the flexibility score to quantify the flexibility by global pocket features. The results show strong correlations between the flexibility scores and root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) values, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.60, 0.76, and 0.53 in Testing Sets I–III. Considering both flexibility score and network calculations, the Pearson correlation coefficient was increased to 0.71 in flexible pockets on Testing Set IV. The network calculations reveal that the long-range interaction changes contributed most to flexibility. In addition, the hydrogen bonds in the base–base interactions greatly stabilize the RNA structure, while backbone interactions determine RNA folding. The computational analysis of pocket flexibility could facilitate RNA engineering for biological or medical applications.
- 13 March 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 24 (6) , 5497
Open AccessRPflex: A Coarse-Grained Network Model for RNA Pocket Flexibility Study
RNA regulates various biological processes, such as gene regulation, RNA splicing, and intracellular signal transduction. RNA’s conformational dynamics play crucial roles in performing its diverse functions. Thus, it is essential to explore the flexibility characteristics of RNA, especially pocket flexibility. Here, we propose a computational approach, RPflex, to analyze pocket flexibility using the coarse-grained network model. We first clustered 3154 pockets into 297 groups by similarity calculation based on the coarse-grained lattice model. Then, we introduced the flexibility score to quantify the flexibility by global pocket features. The results show strong correlations between the flexibility scores and root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF) values, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.60, 0.76, and 0.53 in Testing Sets I–III. Considering both flexibility score and network calculations, the Pearson correlation coefficient was increased to 0.71 in flexible pockets on Testing Set IV. The network calculations reveal that the long-range interaction changes contributed most to flexibility. In addition, the hydrogen bonds in the base–base interactions greatly stabilize the RNA structure, while backbone interactions determine RNA folding. The computational analysis of pocket flexibility could facilitate RNA engineering for biological or medical applications.