GMGraciete Marques

Graciete Marques

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Graciete Marques has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Emotional Distress in Portuguese Cancer Patients: The Use of the Emotion Thermometers (ET) Screening Tool

    by Sónia Silva, Tiago Paredes, Ricardo João Teixeira, Tânia Brandão, Klára Dimitrovová, Diogo Marques, Joana Sousa, Monick Leal, Albina Dias, Carole Neves, et al.

    Cancer patients may experience significant distress. The “Emotion Thermometers” (ETs) are a short visual analogue scale used to screen patients for psychosocial risk. This study aimed to assess emotional distress in a large sample of cancer patients attending psychological services at an non-governmental organization (NGO), and to explore factors that may contribute to it. The ETs were answered by 899 cancer patients. They were, on average, 59.9 years old, the majority were female, had breast cancer, were under treatment or were disease-free survivors, and reported high levels of emotional distress, above the cut-off (≥5). A Generalized Linear Model was used to measure the association between the level of distress, age, gender, disease phase and 33 items of the problem list. Four items—sadness, depression, sleep and breathing—were found to be significantly related to a higher level of distress. Additionally, women and patients who were in the palliative phase also had significantly higher levels of distress. The results confirm the need for early emotional screening in cancer patients, as well as attending to the characteristics of each patient. Additionally, they highlight the utility of the ETs for the clinical practice, allowing to optimize the referral to specialized psychosocial services.


  • Open Access

    Emotional Distress in Portuguese Cancer Patients: The Use of the Emotion Thermometers

    by Sónia Silva, Tiago Paredes, Ricardo João Teixeira, Tânia Brandão, Klára Dimitrovová, Diogo Marques, Joana Sousa, Monick Leal, Albina Dias, Carole Neves, et al.

    Cancer patients may experience significant distress. The “Emotion Thermometers” (ETs) are a short visual analogue scale used to screen patients for psychosocial risk. This study aimed to assess emotional distress in a large sample of cancer patients attending psychological services at an NGO, and to explore factors that may contribute to it. The ETs were answered by 899 cancer patients. They were, on average, 59.9 years old, the majority were female, had breast cancer, were under treatment or were disease-free survivors, and reported high levels of emotional distress, above the cut-off (≥5). A Generalized Linear Model was used to measure the association between the level of Distress and 33 items of the problem list. Four items - sadness, depression, sleep and breathing - were found to be significantly related to a higher level of Distress. Additionally, women and those who were in the palliative phase also had significantly higher levels of Distress. Conclusions: The results confirm the need for early emotional screening in cancer patients, as well as the relevance of attending to the characteristics of each patient. Additionally, they highlight the utility of the ETs for the clinical practice, allowing to optimize the referral to specialized psy-chosocial services.


  • Open Access

    Psychological distress in a Portuguese sample of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

    by Tiago F. Paredes, Sonia M. Silva, Ana F. Pacheco, Bruno C. de Sousa, Carlos A. Pires, Albina S. Dias, Ana L. Costa, Ana R. Mesquita, Eloisa E. Fernandes, Graciete F. Marques, et al.

    Objective: Considering the lack of studies exploring the psychological impact of COVID-19 on patients living with and beyond cancer, this study aimed to explore the levels of emotional distress, anxiety, and depression in patients with cancer and survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify psychological risk factors. Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study were collected through an online questionnaire comprised a self-report questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to characterize the sample and identify the determinants of emotional distress, depression, and anxiety. Statistical analyses were performed using R, version 4.1.1. Results: The sample included 940 patients with cancer and survivors, mostly female (87.1%), with a mean age of 49.7 years. More than half of the patients were survivors (55.1%); 56.7% were diagnosed with breast cancer, and 35.0% had other chronic diseases. Most participants believed that they were more likely to be infected with COVID-19 (53.9%) and that they may have more complications if they were infected (76.7%). Approximately half of the participants revealed significant emotional distress (49.3%), 18.1% revealed significant depression, and 29.2% revealed significant anxiety. Female patients, participants with lower education levels, unemployed/lay-off, or in a medical leave with a chronic disease, taking care of someone with a chronic disease, or perceiving a higher risk of being infected with COVID-19 had higher levels of emotional distress, depression, and anxiety. Conclusions: This study provides useful information regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of patients with cancer and survivors, showing that an increased number of patients experienced significant emotional distress during the pandemic.