Farideh Davoodi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Farideh Davoodi has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Abdollah Saboori
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
2 shared publications - Mohammad Taghian
Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
2 shared publications - Parisa Moazzen
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
2 shared publications - Giuseppe Carbone
Politecnico di Bari
1 shared publication - Luca Iuliano
Department of Management and Production Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy
1 shared publication - Manuela Galati
Department of Management and Production Engineering (DIGEP), Integrated Additive Manufacturing Center (IAM@PoliTo), Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Progress in Additive Manufacturing
- Vol. 11 (6) , 5935-5954
Synergistic surface engineering of PBF-EB/M Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo: linking support-fingerprint morphology to high-temperature tribological behavior
- 14 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Progress in Additive Manufacturing
- Vol. 11 (6) , 5935-5954
Open AccessSynergistic surface engineering of PBF-EB/M Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo: linking support-fingerprint morphology to high-temperature tribological behavior
- 6 June 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in High Entropy Alloys & Materials
- Vol. 2 (2) , 175-218
Exploring Nanocrystalline High Entropy Alloys Fabricated via Mechanical Alloying (MA) and Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS): A Review
- 6 June 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in High Entropy Alloys & Materials
- Vol. 2 (2) , 175-218
Exploring Nanocrystalline High Entropy Alloys Fabricated via Mechanical Alloying (MA) and Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS): A Review
- Open Access
An Overview of the Latest Progress in Internal Surface Finishing of the Additively Manufactured Metallic Components
Fast progress in near-net-shape production of parts has attracted vast interest in internal surface finishing. Interest in designing a modern finishing machine to cover the different shapes of workpieces with different materials has risen recently, and the current state of technology cannot satisfy the high requirements for finishing internal channels in metal-additive-manufactured parts. Therefore, in this work, an effort has been made to close the current gaps. This literature review aims to trace the development of different non-traditional internal surface finishing methods. For this reason, attention is focused on the working principles, capabilities, and limitations of the most applicable processes, such as internal magnetic abrasive finishing, abrasive flow machining, fluidized bed machining, cavitation abrasive finishing, and electrochemical machining. Thereafter, a comparison is presented based on which models were surveyed in detail, with particular attention to their specifications and methods. The assessment is measured by seven key features, with two selected methods deciding their value for a proper hybrid machine.
Open AccessAn Overview of the Latest Progress in Internal Surface Finishing of the Additively Manufactured Metallic Components
Fast progress in near-net-shape production of parts has attracted vast interest in internal surface finishing. Interest in designing a modern finishing machine to cover the different shapes of workpieces with different materials has risen recently, and the current state of technology cannot satisfy the high requirements for finishing internal channels in metal-additive-manufactured parts. Therefore, in this work, an effort has been made to close the current gaps. This literature review aims to trace the development of different non-traditional internal surface finishing methods. For this reason, attention is focused on the working principles, capabilities, and limitations of the most applicable processes, such as internal magnetic abrasive finishing, abrasive flow machining, fluidized bed machining, cavitation abrasive finishing, and electrochemical machining. Thereafter, a comparison is presented based on which models were surveyed in detail, with particular attention to their specifications and methods. The assessment is measured by seven key features, with two selected methods deciding their value for a proper hybrid machine.