Giovanni Mazzotta

Background: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy that frequently progresses to symptomatic heart failure (HF), often with mildly reduced or reduced ejection fraction (EF). Standard therapies are limited in NYHA III–IV, and Tafamidis is approved only for the early stages. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy has shown promise in HF with reduced EF, but its role in ATTR-CM remains unexplored. Methods: This multicentric, prospective pilot study evaluated the safety and efficacy of CCM therapy in ten patients (n = 10) with ATTR-CM, EF between 25 and 45%, and NYHA class III–IV symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy. All patients underwent implantation of the Optimizer CCM system and were followed for at least 12 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of worsening heart failure (WHF); secondary endpoints included changes in EF, NYHA class, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality of life metrics. Results: In this cohort (n = 10), CCM therapy significantly reduced WHF episodes (from 0.18 ± 0.09 to 0.025 ± 0.08 hospitalizations/patient-year, p < 0.001) and improved NYHA class and 6MWT (p < 0.001). EF increased by an average of 4.8 ± 6.1%, and 6MWT improved by 31.3 ± 53.3%. Importantly, all patients became eligible for Tafamidis after CCM therapy due to improved functional status. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that CCM therapy is a feasible and potentially effective option for ATTR-CM patients with advanced HF who are not candidates for existing disease-modifying treatments. These findings support the rationale for larger studies, including the ongoing AMY-CCM registry (NCT05167799), to validate CCM’s therapeutic role in this population.

Cardiac amyloidosis may result in an aggressive form of heart failure (HF). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) has been shown to be a concrete therapeutic option in patients with symptomatic HF, but there is no evidence of its application in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. We present the case of TTR amyloidosis, where CCM therapy proved to be effective. The patient had a history of multiple HF hospitalizations due to an established diagnosis of wild type TTR-Amyloidosis with significant cardiac involvement. Since he was highly symptomatic, except during continuous dobutamine and diuretic infusion, it was opted to pursue CCM therapy device implantation. At follow up, a significant improvement in clinical status was reported with an increase of EF, functional status (6 min walk test improved from zero meters at baseline, to 270 m at 1 month and to 460 m at 12 months), and a reduction in pulmonary pressures. One year after device implantation, no other HF hospital admission was needed. CCM therapy may be effective in this difficult clinical setting. The AMY-CCM Registry, which has just begun, will evaluate the efficacy of CCM in patients with HF and diagnosed TTR amyloidosis to bring new evidence on its potential impact as a therapeutic option.