Laura Nallbati

Background/Objectives: Burn wound infections present significant clinical challenges due to multidrug-resistant pathogens and the limitations of traditional antimicrobials. While antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have broad-spectrum effectiveness, their instability in wound environments limits their use. This study compares properties of AMP-decorated nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) to free AMPs, focusing on their dermal penetration, retention, and antimicrobial efficacy in simulated ex vivo burn wound models. Methods: AMP-decorated NLCs (smart-AMPs) were produced by electrostatic and hydrophobic surface adsorption and characterized regarding their size, zeta potential, and physical short-term stability. The distribution of AMPs within the wounds was evaluated using an ex vivo porcine ear model with various wound types. The antimicrobial efficacy was assessed by monitoring the bioluminescence of Aliivibrio fischeri as a live bacterial marker for 24 h. Results: The size and zeta potential measurements confirmed the successful formation of smart-AMPs. The dermal penetration of AMPs was influenced by the type of wound and the type of AMP formulation (free AMPs vs. smart-AMPs). In the chronically infected burn wounds, which were characterized by the formation of a biofilm in a protein-rich wound fluid, the smart-AMPs resulted in a 1.5-fold higher and deeper penetration of the AMPs, and the antimicrobial activity was 6-fold higher compared to the free AMPs. Conclusions: smart-AMPs present an innovative approach for treating chronic, biofilm-associated wounds more efficiently than the current treatment options.

(1) Background: Many drugs possess poor bioavailability, and many strategies are available to overcome this issue. In this study, smartFilm technology, i.e., a porous cellulose matrix (paper), in which the active compound can be loaded onto in an amorphous state was utilised for oral administration to improve the solubility and bioactivity of a poorly soluble BSC class IV antibiotic. (2) Methods: Norfloxacin was used as the model drug and loaded into commercially available paper. The resulting norfloxacin-loaded smartFilms were transformed into smartFilm granules via wet granulation and the resulting norfloxacin-loaded smartFilm granules were transformed into norfloxacin-loaded tablets made from paper, i.e., smartFilm tablets. The crystalline state of norfloxacin was investigated, as well as the pharmaceutical properties of the granules and the tablets. The bioactivity of the smartFilm tablets was assessed in vitro and ex vivo to determine the antibacterial activity of norfloxacin. The results were compared to a physical mixture tablet that contained non-loaded paper granules and equal amounts of norfloxacin as a crystalline powder. (3) Results: Norfloxacin-loaded smartFilm granules and norfloxacin-loaded smartFilm tablets contained norfloxacin in an amorphous state, which resulted in an improved and faster release of norfloxacin when compared to the physical mixture tablet. The bioactivity was up to three times higher when compared to the physical mixture tablet. The ex vivo model was demonstrated to be a useful tool that allows for a fast and cost-effective discrimination between “good” and “bad” formulations. It provides realistic physiological conditions and can therefore yield meaningful, additional biopharmaceutical information that cannot be assessed in classical in vitro experiments. (4) Conclusions: smartFilm tablets are a promising, universal, industrially feasible and cost-effective formulation strategy for improved solubility and enhanced bioactivity of poorly soluble drugs.