Parag Mehta has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    First-in-Class Immuno-Oncology Drug APG157DS Repolarizes Innate Immune Cells and Induces Durable Remission in a Syngeneic Glioblastoma Model

    by Shubhasmita Mohapatra, Adrian Guerrero, Neha Rahman, Stefan Markovic, Lauren O’Donnell, Youssef Zaim Wadghiri, Khondoker Takia Zaman, Luis Avila, Parag Mehta, Probal Banerjee

    APG157DS is a multi-component investigational drug which is currently the subject of multiple cancer trials. It has shown promising efficacy in patients with head and neck cancer. We report its immuno-modulatory effect in a syngeneic mouse model of glioblastoma (GBM). Long-term treatment with APG157DS led to durable tumor remission in 50% of mice, while all vehicle-treated mice reached humane endpoints within 42 days. Mechanistically, the drug induced selective repolarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from an immunosuppressive Arg1high/iNOSlow phenotype to a tumoricidal Arg1low/iNOShigh state, accompanied by increased intratumoral recruitment of activated (NKp46+) natural killer cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells. APG157DS also suppressed vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) expression in tumors, further impairing tumor growth. Notably, APG157DS did not elicit off-target macrophage activation in peripheral tissues such as the spleen, highlighting its selective immune targeting. These findings provide a mechanistic rationale for further clinical development of APG157DS in GBM and potentially other immune-evasive cancers.

  • Open Access

    Why Don’t the Mutant Cells That Evade DNA Repair Cause Cancer More Frequently? Importance of the Innate Immune System in the Tumor Microenvironment

    by Shubhasmita Mohapatra, Jared Cafiero, Khosrow Kashfi, Parag Mehta, Probal Banerjee

    The standard of care for most malignant solid tumors still involves tumor resection followed by chemo- and radiation therapy, hoping to eliminate the residual tumor cells. This strategy has been successful in extending the life of many cancer patients. Still, for primary glioblastoma (GBM), it has not controlled recurrence or increased the life expectancies of patients. Amid such disappointment, attempts to design therapies using the cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) have gained ground. Such “immunotherapies” have so far overwhelmingly used genetic modifications of Tc cells (Car-T cell therapy) or blocking of proteins (PD-1 or PD-L1) that inhibit Tc-cell-mediated cancer cell elimination. Despite such advances, GBM has remained a “Kiss of Death” for most patients. Although the use of innate immune cells, such as the microglia, macrophages, and natural killer (NK) cells, has been considered in designing therapies for cancers, such attempts have not reached the clinic yet. We have reported a series of preclinical studies highlighting strategies to “re-educate” GBM-associated microglia and macrophages (TAMs) so that they assume a tumoricidal status. Such cells then secrete chemokines to recruit activated, GBM-eliminating NK cells and cause the rescue of 50–60% GBM mice in a syngeneic model of GBM. This review discusses a more fundamental question that most biochemists harbor: “since we are generating mutant cells in our body all the time, why don’t we get cancer more often?” The review visits publications addressing this question and discusses some published strategies for re-educating the TAMs to take on the “sentry” role they initially maintained in the absence of cancer.