Ying-Kai Hu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Ying-Kai Hu has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chi Yang
Department of Oral Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Duohong Zou
Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
1 shared publication - Guangzhou Xu
Professor, Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
1 shared publication - Wen-Tao Qian
Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 May 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Vol. 34 (6) , 1799-1803
A Study of Two Novel Techniques for One-stage Closure of Chronic Oroantral Fistula and Sinus Floor Lift
Purpose: This study aimed to compare two novel techniques for chronic oroantral fistula (OAF) closure combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods: Ten patients who had implant installation needs but suffered from a chronic OAF were enrolled in the study from January 2016 to June 2021. The technique applied involved OAF closure and simultaneous sinus floor elevation by either a transalveolar or lateral window approach. Bone graft material evaluation results, postoperative clinical symptoms and complications were compared between the two groups. Student’s t-test and χ2 test were used to analyze the results. Results: In this study, 5 patients with a chronic OAF were treated with the transalveolar approach (group I), and 5 were treated with the lateral window approach (group II). The alveolar bone height was significantly higher in group II than in group I (P＜0.001). The pain at 1 day (P=0.018) and 3 days (P=0.029) postoperatively and facial swelling at 7 days (P=0.016) postoperatively were obviously greater in group II than in group I. There were no severe complications in either group. Conclusions: The techniques combined OAF closure with sinus lifting to reduce surgical frequency and risks. The transalveolar approach resulted in milder postoperative reactions, but the lateral approach could provide more bone volume.
- 29 May 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- Vol. 34 (6) , 1799-1803
Open AccessA Study of Two Novel Techniques for One-stage Closure of Chronic Oroantral Fistula and Sinus Floor Lift
Purpose: This study aimed to compare two novel techniques for chronic oroantral fistula (OAF) closure combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods: Ten patients who had implant installation needs but suffered from a chronic OAF were enrolled in the study from January 2016 to June 2021. The technique applied involved OAF closure and simultaneous sinus floor elevation by either a transalveolar or lateral window approach. Bone graft material evaluation results, postoperative clinical symptoms and complications were compared between the two groups. Student’s t-test and χ2 test were used to analyze the results. Results: In this study, 5 patients with a chronic OAF were treated with the transalveolar approach (group I), and 5 were treated with the lateral window approach (group II). The alveolar bone height was significantly higher in group II than in group I (P＜0.001). The pain at 1 day (P=0.018) and 3 days (P=0.029) postoperatively and facial swelling at 7 days (P=0.016) postoperatively were obviously greater in group II than in group I. There were no severe complications in either group. Conclusions: The techniques combined OAF closure with sinus lifting to reduce surgical frequency and risks. The transalveolar approach resulted in milder postoperative reactions, but the lateral approach could provide more bone volume.