A. Nathan Frazier
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
A. Nathan Frazier has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jacek A. Koziel
Livestock Nutrient Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory
4 shared publications - Matthew Raymond Beck
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
2 shared publications Aeriel D. Belk
Affiliation Department of Animal Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America
1 shared publication- Aeriel D. Belk
Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University
1 shared publication - Anna Ortiz
USDA-ARS Livestock Nutrient Management Research Unit, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory , 2300 Experiment Station, Bushland, TX 79109
1 shared publication - Balasubramanian Arunraj
The Center for Biorenewable Chemicals, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Structural and Metabolic Characterization of Ni(I)-inhibitors Provide a Robust Anti-Methanogenicity Scoring System
Atmospheric methane (CH4) acts as a key contributor to global warming and a short-lived climate forcer. CH4 mitigation represents the most promising means to address short-term climate change. Ruminant enteric CH4 produced by methanogenic archaea represents 27.2% of global CH4 emissions. Only a few of the direct methanogenesis inhibitors identified bear high mitigation potential hence it is important to investigate their underlying modes of action. Here, we elucidated biophysical and thermodynamic interplay between known inhibitors and cofactor F430, to determine their stoichiometric ratios and binding affinities. We leverage this prior in a robust contrastive learning approach to functionally cluster known sixteen inhibitors and 53,959 bovine-linked metabolites. We demonstrate a multi-factor optimization protocol to identify putative inhibitors with: (i) high bacterial membrane permeability, (ii) no adverse effect to ruminal fermentation, (iii) known degradation pathway, and (iv) direct commercial availability. Subsequent in vitro assays and community metabolic modeling with a first set of eight treatment molecules revealed structo-metabolic priors that tie thermodynamic signatures of inhibition to metabolic flux shifts. We established a multi-scale workflow that transforms ostensibly negative compounds into mechanistic insight, linking rumen metabolic flux shifts to MCR–F430-Ni(I) inhibition chemistry as a foundation for rational methane-mitigation design. COVER
Open AccessStructural and Metabolic Characterization of Ni(I)-inhibitors Provide a Robust Anti-Methanogenicity Scoring System
Atmospheric methane (CH4) acts as a key contributor to global warming and a short-lived climate forcer. CH4 mitigation represents the most promising means to address short-term climate change. Ruminant enteric CH4 produced by methanogenic archaea represents 27.2% of global CH4 emissions. Only a few of the direct methanogenesis inhibitors identified bear high mitigation potential hence it is important to investigate their underlying modes of action. Here, we elucidated biophysical and thermodynamic interplay between known inhibitors and cofactor F430, to determine their stoichiometric ratios and binding affinities. We leverage this prior in a robust contrastive learning approach to functionally cluster known sixteen inhibitors and 53,959 bovine-linked metabolites. We demonstrate a multi-factor optimization protocol to identify putative inhibitors with: (i) high bacterial membrane permeability, (ii) no adverse effect to ruminal fermentation, (iii) known degradation pathway, and (iv) direct commercial availability. Subsequent in vitro assays and community metabolic modeling with a first set of eight treatment molecules revealed structo-metabolic priors that tie thermodynamic signatures of inhibition to metabolic flux shifts. We established a multi-scale workflow that transforms ostensibly negative compounds into mechanistic insight, linking rumen metabolic flux shifts to MCR–F430-Ni(I) inhibition chemistry as a foundation for rational methane-mitigation design. COVER
- Open Access
- 27 March 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 13 (4) , 758
Characterization and Assembly Dynamics of the Microbiome Associated with Swine Anaerobic Lagoon Manure Treated with Biochar
Biochar has significant potential for livestock microbiomes and crop agriculture regarding greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Therefore, a pilot study was designed to investigate the effect of biochar application on the surface of swine manure from an open lagoon and the associated microbial communities. Samples were collected from four different treatment groups: control (n = 4), coarse biochar (n = 4), fine biochar (n = 4), and ultra-fine biochar (n = 4). Additionally, aged manure in bulk was collected (n = 4) to assess alterations from the control group. The method of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing along with microbial analyses was performed. Diversity was significantly different between aged manure in bulk samples and all treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis; p < 0.05). Additionally, distinct community compositions were seen using both weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance matrices (PERMANOVA; p < 0.01). Differential abundance analysis revealed four distinct features within all treatment groups that were enriched (q < 0.001): Idiomarina spp., Geovibrio thiophilus, Parapusillimonas granuli, and an uncultured Gammaproteobacteria species. Similarly, Comamonas spp. and Brumimicrobium aurantiacum (q-value < 0.001) were significantly depleted by all the treatments. Stochastic and functional analyses revealed that biochar treatments were not deterministically altering assembly patterns, and functional redundancy was evident regardless of compositional shifts.
- 27 March 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 13 (4) , 758
Open AccessCharacterization and Assembly Dynamics of the Microbiome Associated with Swine Anaerobic Lagoon Manure Treated with Biochar
Biochar has significant potential for livestock microbiomes and crop agriculture regarding greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Therefore, a pilot study was designed to investigate the effect of biochar application on the surface of swine manure from an open lagoon and the associated microbial communities. Samples were collected from four different treatment groups: control (n = 4), coarse biochar (n = 4), fine biochar (n = 4), and ultra-fine biochar (n = 4). Additionally, aged manure in bulk was collected (n = 4) to assess alterations from the control group. The method of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing along with microbial analyses was performed. Diversity was significantly different between aged manure in bulk samples and all treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis; p < 0.05). Additionally, distinct community compositions were seen using both weighted and unweighted UniFrac distance matrices (PERMANOVA; p < 0.01). Differential abundance analysis revealed four distinct features within all treatment groups that were enriched (q < 0.001): Idiomarina spp., Geovibrio thiophilus, Parapusillimonas granuli, and an uncultured Gammaproteobacteria species. Similarly, Comamonas spp. and Brumimicrobium aurantiacum (q-value < 0.001) were significantly depleted by all the treatments. Stochastic and functional analyses revealed that biochar treatments were not deterministically altering assembly patterns, and functional redundancy was evident regardless of compositional shifts.
- Open Access
Stochasticity Highlights the Development of Both the Gastrointestinal and Upper-Respiratory-Tract Microbiomes of Neonatal Dairy Calves in Early Life
The microbiome of dairy calves undergoes extensive change due to various forces during the first weeks of life. Importantly, diseases such as bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and calf diarrhea can have profound impacts on the early-life microbiome. Therefore, a longitudinal, repeated-measures pilot study was designed to characterize the establishment of nasal and fecal microbiomes of dairy calves, assess the governing forces of microbial assembly, and evaluate how disease states impact these microbial ecologies. Dairy calves (n = 19) were clinically evaluated for gastrointestinal and respiratory disease across three weeks beginning at age ≤ seven days old. Fecal (n = 57) and nasal (n = 57) microbial samples were taken for paired-end 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Taxonomy and diversity analyses were used to characterize early-life nasal and fecal microbiomes. Stochasticity and determinism were measured using normalized stochasticity testing (NST) and Dirichlet multinomial model (DMM). All analyses were tested for statistical significance. Clinical diarrhea was observed in 11 of the 19 calves. Clinical BRD was not independently observed among the cohort; however, two calves presented clinical signs of both BRD and diarrhea. Taxonomic analysis revealed that fecal samples were highlighted by Bacteroidaceae (40%; relative abundance), Ruminococcaceae (13%), and Lachnospiraceae (10%), with changes in diversity (Kruskal–Wallis; p < 0.05) and composition (PERMANOVA; p < 0.05). Clinical diarrhea reduced diversity in the fecal microbiome but did not impact composition. Nasal samples featured Moraxellaceae (49%), Mycoplasmataceae (16%), and Pasteurellaceae (3%). While no diversity changes were seen in nasal samples, compositional changes were observed (p < 0.05). NST metrics (Kruskal–Wallis; p > 0.01) and DMM (PERMANOVA; p < 0.01) revealed that stochastic, neutral theory-based assembly dynamics govern early-life microbial composition and that distinct microbial populations drive community composition in healthy and diarrheic calves.
Open AccessStochasticity Highlights the Development of Both the Gastrointestinal and Upper-Respiratory-Tract Microbiomes of Neonatal Dairy Calves in Early Life
The microbiome of dairy calves undergoes extensive change due to various forces during the first weeks of life. Importantly, diseases such as bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and calf diarrhea can have profound impacts on the early-life microbiome. Therefore, a longitudinal, repeated-measures pilot study was designed to characterize the establishment of nasal and fecal microbiomes of dairy calves, assess the governing forces of microbial assembly, and evaluate how disease states impact these microbial ecologies. Dairy calves (n = 19) were clinically evaluated for gastrointestinal and respiratory disease across three weeks beginning at age ≤ seven days old. Fecal (n = 57) and nasal (n = 57) microbial samples were taken for paired-end 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Taxonomy and diversity analyses were used to characterize early-life nasal and fecal microbiomes. Stochasticity and determinism were measured using normalized stochasticity testing (NST) and Dirichlet multinomial model (DMM). All analyses were tested for statistical significance. Clinical diarrhea was observed in 11 of the 19 calves. Clinical BRD was not independently observed among the cohort; however, two calves presented clinical signs of both BRD and diarrhea. Taxonomic analysis revealed that fecal samples were highlighted by Bacteroidaceae (40%; relative abundance), Ruminococcaceae (13%), and Lachnospiraceae (10%), with changes in diversity (Kruskal–Wallis; p < 0.05) and composition (PERMANOVA; p < 0.05). Clinical diarrhea reduced diversity in the fecal microbiome but did not impact composition. Nasal samples featured Moraxellaceae (49%), Mycoplasmataceae (16%), and Pasteurellaceae (3%). While no diversity changes were seen in nasal samples, compositional changes were observed (p < 0.05). NST metrics (Kruskal–Wallis; p > 0.01) and DMM (PERMANOVA; p < 0.01) revealed that stochastic, neutral theory-based assembly dynamics govern early-life microbial composition and that distinct microbial populations drive community composition in healthy and diarrheic calves.
- Open Access
- 2 December 2024
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Microbiology
- Vol. 15, 1503315
Connecting the ruminant microbiome to climate change: insights from current ecological and evolutionary concepts
Ruminant livestock provide meat, milk, wool, and other products required for human subsistence. Within the digestive tract of ruminant animals, the rumen houses a complex and diverse microbial ecosystem. These microbes generate many of the nutrients that are needed by the host animal for maintenance and production. However, enteric methane (CH4) is also produced during the final stage of anaerobic digestion. Growing public concern for global climate change has driven the agriculture sector to enhance its investigation into CH4 mitigation. Many CH4 mitigation methods have been explored, with varying outcomes. With the advent of new sequencing technologies, the host–microbe interactions that mediate fermentation processes have been examined to enhance ruminant enteric CH4 mitigation strategies. In this review, we describe current knowledge of the factors driving ruminant microbial assembly, how this relates to functionality, and how CH4 mitigation approaches influence ecological and evolutionary gradients. Through the current literature, we elucidated that many ecological and evolutionary properties are working in tandem in the assembly of ruminant microbes and in the functionality of these microbes in methanogenesis. Additionally, we provide a conceptual framework for future research wherein ecological and evolutionary dynamics account for CH4 mitigation in ruminant microbial composition. Thus, preparation of future research should incorporate this framework to address the roles ecology and evolution have in anthropogenic climate change.
- 2 December 2024
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Microbiology
- Vol. 15, 1503315
Open AccessConnecting the ruminant microbiome to climate change: insights from current ecological and evolutionary concepts
Ruminant livestock provide meat, milk, wool, and other products required for human subsistence. Within the digestive tract of ruminant animals, the rumen houses a complex and diverse microbial ecosystem. These microbes generate many of the nutrients that are needed by the host animal for maintenance and production. However, enteric methane (CH4) is also produced during the final stage of anaerobic digestion. Growing public concern for global climate change has driven the agriculture sector to enhance its investigation into CH4 mitigation. Many CH4 mitigation methods have been explored, with varying outcomes. With the advent of new sequencing technologies, the host–microbe interactions that mediate fermentation processes have been examined to enhance ruminant enteric CH4 mitigation strategies. In this review, we describe current knowledge of the factors driving ruminant microbial assembly, how this relates to functionality, and how CH4 mitigation approaches influence ecological and evolutionary gradients. Through the current literature, we elucidated that many ecological and evolutionary properties are working in tandem in the assembly of ruminant microbes and in the functionality of these microbes in methanogenesis. Additionally, we provide a conceptual framework for future research wherein ecological and evolutionary dynamics account for CH4 mitigation in ruminant microbial composition. Thus, preparation of future research should incorporate this framework to address the roles ecology and evolution have in anthropogenic climate change.
- Open Access
- 22 August 2024
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 19 (8) , e0308914
Impact of methane mitigation strategies on the native ruminant microbiome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Recently, research has investigated the role of the ruminant native microbiome, and the role microbes play in methane (CH4) production and mitigation. However, the variation across microbiome studies makes implementing impactful strategies difficult. The first objective of this study is to identify, summarize, compile, and discuss the current literature on CH4 mitigation strategies and how they interact with the native ruminant microbiome. The second objective is to perform a meta-analysis on the identified16S rRNA sequencing data. A literature search using Web of Science, Scopus, AGRIS, and Google Scholar will be implemented. Eligible criteria will be defined using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) elements. Two independent reviewers will be utilized for both the literature search and data compilation. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk Bias 2.0 tool. Publicly available 16S rRNA amplicon gene sequencing data will be downloaded from NCBI Sequence Read Archive, European Nucleotide Archive or similar database using appropriate extraction methods. Data processing will be performed using QIIME2 following a standardized protocol. Meta-analyses will be performed on both alpha and beta diversity as well as taxonomic analyses. Alpha diversity metrics will be tested using a Kruskal-Wallis test with a Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction. Beta diversity will be statistically tested using PERMANOVA testing with multiple test corrections. Hedge’s g standardized mean difference statistic will be used to calculate fixed and random effects model estimates using a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity between studies will be assessed using the I2 statistic. Potential publication bias will be further assessed using Begg’s correlation test and Egger’s regression test. The GRADE approach will be used to assess the certainty of evidence. The following protocol will be used to guide future research and meta-analyses for investigating CH4 mitigation strategies and ruminant microbial ecology. The future work could be used to enhance livestock management techniques for GHG control. This protocol is registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/vt56c) and available in the Systematic Reviews for Animals and Food (https://www.syreaf.org/contact).
- 22 August 2024
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 19 (8) , e0308914
Open AccessImpact of methane mitigation strategies on the native ruminant microbiome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Recently, research has investigated the role of the ruminant native microbiome, and the role microbes play in methane (CH4) production and mitigation. However, the variation across microbiome studies makes implementing impactful strategies difficult. The first objective of this study is to identify, summarize, compile, and discuss the current literature on CH4 mitigation strategies and how they interact with the native ruminant microbiome. The second objective is to perform a meta-analysis on the identified16S rRNA sequencing data. A literature search using Web of Science, Scopus, AGRIS, and Google Scholar will be implemented. Eligible criteria will be defined using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) elements. Two independent reviewers will be utilized for both the literature search and data compilation. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk Bias 2.0 tool. Publicly available 16S rRNA amplicon gene sequencing data will be downloaded from NCBI Sequence Read Archive, European Nucleotide Archive or similar database using appropriate extraction methods. Data processing will be performed using QIIME2 following a standardized protocol. Meta-analyses will be performed on both alpha and beta diversity as well as taxonomic analyses. Alpha diversity metrics will be tested using a Kruskal-Wallis test with a Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction. Beta diversity will be statistically tested using PERMANOVA testing with multiple test corrections. Hedge’s g standardized mean difference statistic will be used to calculate fixed and random effects model estimates using a 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity between studies will be assessed using the I2 statistic. Potential publication bias will be further assessed using Begg’s correlation test and Egger’s regression test. The GRADE approach will be used to assess the certainty of evidence. The following protocol will be used to guide future research and meta-analyses for investigating CH4 mitigation strategies and ruminant microbial ecology. The future work could be used to enhance livestock management techniques for GHG control. This protocol is registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/vt56c) and available in the Systematic Reviews for Animals and Food (https://www.syreaf.org/contact).
- Open Access
- 25 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
- Vol. 14
Utilizing a CRISPR-Cas9 targeted foodborne pathogen antimicrobial within livestock feed: A Market Research Perspective
- 25 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
- Vol. 14
Open AccessUtilizing a CRISPR-Cas9 targeted foodborne pathogen antimicrobial within livestock feed: A Market Research Perspective