Daniel Rodgers
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Daniel Rodgers has a total of 40 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Teruhiko Imamura
Second Department of Internal Medicine University of Toyama Toyama Japan
4 shared publications Ben Chung
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
3 shared publications- Bryan Smith
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
3 shared publications - Gabriel Sayer
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
3 shared publications - Gene Kim
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
3 shared publications - Nir Uriel
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 April 2022
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Vol. 41 (4) , S139
Evaluation of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation on Clinical Outcomes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
- 7 April 2022
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Vol. 41 (4) , S139
Open AccessEvaluation of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation on Clinical Outcomes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
- 24 December 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Transplantation Proceedings
- Vol. 53 (2) , 673-680
Incidence and Clinical Significance of Hyperkalemia Following Heart Transplantation
- 24 December 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Transplantation Proceedings
- Vol. 53 (2) , 673-680
Incidence and Clinical Significance of Hyperkalemia Following Heart Transplantation
- Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 109 (3) , 945-949
Estimation of the Severity of Aortic Insufficiency by HVAD Flow Waveform
- 1 March 2020
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 109 (3) , 945-949
Open AccessEstimation of the Severity of Aortic Insufficiency by HVAD Flow Waveform
- Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in ASAIO Journal
- Vol. 66 (3) , 253-257
Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Tolvaptan is an effective therapy for heart failure patients with symptomatic congestion and hyponatremia. The efficacy of its use in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in LVAD patients. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between January 2014 and August 2018. Among 217 consecutive LVAD patients, tolvaptan was used in 20 patients. Mean age was 46 ± 14 years old and 14 patients were males. The duration of tolvaptan therapy was 4 (interquartile range 1–8) days. Urine volume significantly increased from 2,623 ± 1,109 ml/day before tolvaptan to 4,308 ± 1,432 ml/day during tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). Serum sodium increased from 127 ± 3 to 133 ± 3 mEq/L at the end of tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). No patients developed hypernatremia (serum sodium >150 mEq/L). The 90-day overall survival following tolvaptan therapy was 89% in both the tolvaptan group and a propensity score-matched non-tolvaptan group (p = 0.918). Survival free of heart failure readmissions was also comparable between the groups (p = 0.751). In conclusion, short-term use of tolvaptan following LVAD implantation is a safe and effective therapy to augment diuresis and improve hyponatremia.
- 1 March 2020
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in ASAIO Journal
- Vol. 66 (3) , 253-257
Open AccessShort-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Tolvaptan is an effective therapy for heart failure patients with symptomatic congestion and hyponatremia. The efficacy of its use in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in LVAD patients. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between January 2014 and August 2018. Among 217 consecutive LVAD patients, tolvaptan was used in 20 patients. Mean age was 46 ± 14 years old and 14 patients were males. The duration of tolvaptan therapy was 4 (interquartile range 1–8) days. Urine volume significantly increased from 2,623 ± 1,109 ml/day before tolvaptan to 4,308 ± 1,432 ml/day during tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). Serum sodium increased from 127 ± 3 to 133 ± 3 mEq/L at the end of tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). No patients developed hypernatremia (serum sodium >150 mEq/L). The 90-day overall survival following tolvaptan therapy was 89% in both the tolvaptan group and a propensity score-matched non-tolvaptan group (p = 0.918). Survival free of heart failure readmissions was also comparable between the groups (p = 0.751). In conclusion, short-term use of tolvaptan following LVAD implantation is a safe and effective therapy to augment diuresis and improve hyponatremia.
- 14 November 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in ASAIO Journal
- Vol. 66 (8) , 881-885
Neurohormonal Blockade During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support
Neurohormonal blockade (NHB) is the mainstay of therapy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). However, the efficacy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) remains unknown. Of all, 114 LVAD patients (57 [48, 65] years old and 78% male) were enrolled and followed during the early period (6 months after index discharge), and 98 were followed during the late period (6-12 months following index discharge). Of them, 46% were on beta-blocker (BB), 49% on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and 51% on aldosterone antagonist at baseline. Prevalence of BB and ACEi/ARB use increased during the study period. During the early period, similar event rates were found irrespective of the NHB uses. During the late period, BB was associated with reduced HF readmission, and ACEi/ARB was associated with reduced HF readmission and gastrointestinal bleeding (p< 0.05 for all). In conclusion, BB and ACEi/ARB use during the late period was associated with a reduction in HF recurrence in LVAD patients. Further prospective randomized control trials are warranted to clarify the utility of NHB therapy in LVAD patients.
- 14 November 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in ASAIO Journal
- Vol. 66 (8) , 881-885
Neurohormonal Blockade During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support
Neurohormonal blockade (NHB) is the mainstay of therapy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). However, the efficacy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) remains unknown. Of all, 114 LVAD patients (57 [48, 65] years old and 78% male) were enrolled and followed during the early period (6 months after index discharge), and 98 were followed during the late period (6-12 months following index discharge). Of them, 46% were on beta-blocker (BB), 49% on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and 51% on aldosterone antagonist at baseline. Prevalence of BB and ACEi/ARB use increased during the study period. During the early period, similar event rates were found irrespective of the NHB uses. During the late period, BB was associated with reduced HF readmission, and ACEi/ARB was associated with reduced HF readmission and gastrointestinal bleeding (p< 0.05 for all). In conclusion, BB and ACEi/ARB use during the late period was associated with a reduction in HF recurrence in LVAD patients. Further prospective randomized control trials are warranted to clarify the utility of NHB therapy in LVAD patients.