Francesca Prioli
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Francesca Prioli has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Carmela De Crea
Ospedale Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell’Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00186 Rome, Italy
3 shared publications - Francesco Pennestrì
UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Centro Dipartimentale di Chirurgia Endocrina e dell’Obesità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
3 shared publications - Luca Revelli
U.O.C. Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
3 shared publications - Luca Sessa
Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell’Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
3 shared publications - Marco Raffaelli
UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
3 shared publications - Pierpaolo Gallucci
UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Surgical Techniques Development
- Vol. 13 (2) , 192-204
Locoregional vs. General Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis: A Feasibility Study
Focused parathyroidectomy is the preferred surgical method for treating primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) sustained by the pre-operatively well-localized parathyroid adenoma. We aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and short-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) in locoregional anaesthesia (LA) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) by means of propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Retrospective research of patients who underwent MIVAP between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anaesthesiologic procedure (LA vs. GA). Overall, 553 patients underwent MIVAP. After PSM, 115 patients in the LA group and 230 patients in the GA group were included. MIVAP under LA was associated with shorter median operative time (16 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001), shorter median operative room occupation time (44 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001), and lesser median post-operative visual analogue scale pain, with comparable post-operative hospital stay and complication rate. MIVAP under LA is a safe and feasible procedure with significant advantages over GA in terms of post-operative pain and operative room occupation time. This last step can finally result in more efficient utilisation of the operative room and the health care system’s resources.
- 11 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Surgical Techniques Development
- Vol. 13 (2) , 192-204
Open AccessLocoregional vs. General Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis: A Feasibility Study
Focused parathyroidectomy is the preferred surgical method for treating primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) sustained by the pre-operatively well-localized parathyroid adenoma. We aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and short-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) in locoregional anaesthesia (LA) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) by means of propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Retrospective research of patients who underwent MIVAP between January 2014 and December 2022 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups based on the anaesthesiologic procedure (LA vs. GA). Overall, 553 patients underwent MIVAP. After PSM, 115 patients in the LA group and 230 patients in the GA group were included. MIVAP under LA was associated with shorter median operative time (16 vs. 35 min, p < 0.001), shorter median operative room occupation time (44 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001), and lesser median post-operative visual analogue scale pain, with comparable post-operative hospital stay and complication rate. MIVAP under LA is a safe and feasible procedure with significant advantages over GA in terms of post-operative pain and operative room occupation time. This last step can finally result in more efficient utilisation of the operative room and the health care system’s resources.
- Open Access
- 18 September 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 61-69
Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy
- 18 September 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 61-69
Open AccessMinimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy
- Open Access
Barbed vs. Conventional Sutures in Bariatric Surgery: Early and Late Outcomes
The implementation of barbed sutures appears to enhance the process of suturing and knot tying, particularly in the field of bariatric surgery, where they can offer significant advantages. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of utilising barbed sutures for gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) and jejuno-jejunal anastomosis (JJA) anastomosis in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). Data from patients who underwent primary RYGB between January 2012 and October 2018 were retrospectively collected using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to randomise groups (barbed sutures—BS-G and conventional sutures—CS-G). The primary outcome was postoperative early complications. The secondary outcomes were late complications (internal hernias and small bowel obstructions), operative time and postoperative hospital stay. A total of 969 patients were included. After PSM, 322 (161 in BS-G vs. 161 in CS-G) patients were compared (chi-square 0.287, p = 0.862). Postoperative early and late complications were comparable between the two groups. BS-G had a significantly shorter median operative time (65 vs. 95 min p < 0.001). Median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS-G (2 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Barbed sutures effectively reduce the operation duration and are as safe as conventional sutures for closing anastomotic defects during RYGB.
Open AccessBarbed vs. Conventional Sutures in Bariatric Surgery: Early and Late Outcomes
The implementation of barbed sutures appears to enhance the process of suturing and knot tying, particularly in the field of bariatric surgery, where they can offer significant advantages. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of utilising barbed sutures for gastric pouch-jejunal anastomosis (GPJA) and jejuno-jejunal anastomosis (JJA) anastomosis in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). Data from patients who underwent primary RYGB between January 2012 and October 2018 were retrospectively collected using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to randomise groups (barbed sutures—BS-G and conventional sutures—CS-G). The primary outcome was postoperative early complications. The secondary outcomes were late complications (internal hernias and small bowel obstructions), operative time and postoperative hospital stay. A total of 969 patients were included. After PSM, 322 (161 in BS-G vs. 161 in CS-G) patients were compared (chi-square 0.287, p = 0.862). Postoperative early and late complications were comparable between the two groups. BS-G had a significantly shorter median operative time (65 vs. 95 min p < 0.001). Median postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for BS-G (2 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Barbed sutures effectively reduce the operation duration and are as safe as conventional sutures for closing anastomotic defects during RYGB.