Sepideh Mollajafari

Sepideh Mollajafari

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Sepideh Mollajafari has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Managing Digital Evidence in Cybercrime: Efforts Towards a Sustainable Blockchain-Based Solution

    by Hasibul Alam Ratul, Sepideh Mollajafari, Martin Wynn

    Digital evidence plays a crucial role in cybercrime investigations by linking individuals to criminal activities. Data collection, preservation, and analysis can benefit from emerging technologies like blockchain to provide a secure, distributed ledger for managing digital evidence. This study proposes a blockchain-based solution for managing digital evidence in cybercrime cases in the judicial domain. The proposed solution provides the basis for the development of a new model that leverages a consortium blockchain, allowing secure collaboration among judicial stakeholders, while ensuring data integrity and admissibility in court. An extensive literature review demonstrates blockchain’s potential to create a more secure, efficient evidence management system. The proposed model was implemented in a test environment using a localised blockchain for developing and testing smart contracts, as well as integrating a web interface, with off-chain storage for managing evidence data. The system was subsequently deployed in both the Polygon and Ethereum test networks, simulating real-world blockchain environments, revealing that the operational cost in the Polygon network is reduced by 99.96% compared to Ethereum, thereby offering scalability without compromising security. This study underscores blockchain’s potential to revolutionise the chain of custody procedures, improving dependability and security in evidence management and providing more sustainable solutions within the criminal justice system.


  • Open Access

    Blockchain Technology and Related Security Risks: Towards a Seven-Layer Perspective and Taxonomy

    by Sepideh Mollajafari, Kamal Bechkoum

    Blockchain technology can be a useful tool to address issues related to sustainability. From its initial foundation based on cryptocurrency to the development of smart contracts, blockchain technology promises significant business benefits for various industry sectors, including the potential to offer more trustworthy modes of governance, reducing the risks for environmental and economic crises. Notwithstanding its known benefits, and despite having some protective measures and security features, this emerging technology still faces significant security challenges within its different abstract layers. This paper classifies the critical cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities inherent in smart contracts based on an in-depth literature review and analysis. From the perspective of architectural layering, each layer of the blockchain has its own corresponding security issues. In order to have a detailed look at the source of security vulnerabilities within the blockchain, a seven-layer architecture is used, whereby the various components of each layer are set out, highlighting the related security risks and corresponding countermeasures. This is followed by a taxonomy that establishes the inter-relationships between the vulnerabilities and attacks in a smart contract. A specific emphasis is placed on the issues caused by centralisation within smart contracts, whereby a “one-owner” controls access, thus threatening the very decentralised nature that blockchain is based upon. This work offers two main contributions: firstly, a general taxonomy that compiles the different vulnerabilities, types of attacks, and related countermeasures within each of the seven layers of the blockchain; secondly, a specific focus on one layer of the blockchain namely, the contract layer. A model application is developed that depicts, in more detail, the security risks within the contract layer, while enlisting the best practices and tools to use to mitigate against these risks. The findings point to future research on developing countermeasures to alleviate the security risks and vulnerabilities inherent to one-owner control in smart contracts.