Degang Xu

This study presents a novel top-down approach to quantify diffuse methane (CH₄) emissions at oil and gas well sites. It uses an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) equipped with a scanning–sampling tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) CH₄ measurement instrument. By integrating the top-down emission rate retrieval algorithm (TERRA) and adopting concentric circular sampling, the method aims to overcome the limitations of traditional ground-based measurements. The UAV system was deployed at 11 oil and gas sites in the Changqing Oilfield. The results show that the average CH₄ emission rate detected by the UAV is 1.425 kg/h (excluding non-detected samples), which is larger than the 1.061 kg/h obtained from ground-based onsite direct measurement. This discrepancy may be because the UAV’s scanning–sampling capability can cover a larger area, capturing scattered or hidden diffuse emission sources that might be missed by ground-based onsite direct measurement. The study demonstrates that the UAV-based approach with a scanning–sampling TDLAS CH₄ measurement instrument, integrated with the TERRA and concentric circular sampling, is effective in capturing diffuse CH₄ emissions at oil and gas well sites, providing a viable method for large-scale and efficient monitoring of such emissions. This approach could provide an effective pathway for large-scale, efficient, and cost-effective monitoring of methane emissions.

The top–down emission rate retrieval algorithm (TERRA) method for calculating the net flux out of a box has been employed by other researchers to assess large sources of methane release. This usually requires a manned aircraft drone with powerful performance to fly over the boundary layer. Few studies have focused on low-altitude box sampling mass balance methods for small sources of methane release, such as at maximum flight altitudes of less than 100 m. The accuracy and sources of uncertainty in such a method still need to be determined as they differ from the conditions of large sources. Nineteen flights were conducted to detect methane emissions from Chinese oil field well sites using a measurement system consisting of a quadcopter and methane, wind speed, wind direction, air pressure, and temperature sensors. The accuracy and uncertainty of the method are discussed. The average absolute relative error of the measurement is 18.5%, with an average uncertainty of 55.75%. The uncertainty is mainly caused by the wind speed and direction, and the background CH₄ concentration. The main paths to reduce uncertainty and improve accuracy for low-altitude box sampling include subtracting the background concentration during flux retrieval, enhancing the accuracy of methane measurements, selecting a period of downwind dominant or wind direction change of less than 30 degrees, and ensuring a maximum flight height greater than 50 m with a horizontal distance from the pollution source center of less than 75 m. The results show that TERRA-based low-altitude box sampling is suitable for quantifying methane release rates from small sources.

As the global third-largest stationary source of carbon emissions, petroleum refineries have attracted much attention. Many investigations and methodologies have been used for the quantification of carbon emissions of refineries at the industry or enterprise scale. The granularity of current carbon emissions data impairs the reliability of precise mitigation, so analysis and identification of influencing factors for carbon emissions at a more micro-level, such as unit level, is essential. In this paper, four typical units, including fluid catalytic cracking, Continuous Catalytic Reforming, delayed coking, and hydrogen production, were chosen as objects. A typical 5-million-ton scale Chinese petroleum refinery was selected as an investigating object. The Redundancy analysis and multiple regression analysis were utilized to explore the relationship between the process parameters and carbon emissions. Three types of influencing factors include reaction conditions, processing scale, and materials property. The most important mitigation of carbon emission, in this case, can be summarized as measures of improving energy efficiency via optimizing equipment parameters or prompting mass efficiency by upgrading the scale for material and energy flow.