AKAnne-Sophie Kuhlmann

Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann has a total of 39 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of Anti-HIV Immunotoxin, Antibody–Drug Conjugate, and Radioimmunoconjugate Targeted by the Same Antibody

    by Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann, Tami Peters, Donald K. Hamlin, Yawen Li, Xinyi Wang, Megan Stackhouse, Frances M. Cole, Jasmin Martinez-Reyes, Brenda M. Sandmaier, Hans-Peter Kiem, et al.

    Background: We are developing cytotoxic immunoconjugates (CICs) to eliminate HIV-infected cells. We investigated the efficacy and kinetics of killing by different forms of CICs targeted by the same monoclonal antibody (mAb), an immunotoxin (IT), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and radioimmunoconjugate (RIC). Methods: We compared in vitro effects of CICs made by conjugating anti-gp41 mAb 7B2 to deglycosylated ricin A chain (7B2-dgA), the anthracycline derivative PNU-159682 (7B2-PNU), or the α-emitting isotope actinium-225 (7B2-225Ac). Kinetic analyses of cell growth were performed measuring electrical impedance every 15 min over a 7-day period using cells stably expressing the HIV envelope and Env-negative parent cells. Results: 7B2-dgA and 7B2-225Ac were more potent and acted more rapidly to kill cells than 7B2-PNU. Both the 7B2-PNU and 7B2-225Ac induced bystander-cell killing, whereas the IT did not and consequently allowed the outgrowth of Env-negative cells. Low dose or brief exposure to 7B2-PNU resulted in an increased rate of cell growth. Conclusions: An IT, ADC, and RIC showed substantial differences in the degree of specific toxicity, kinetics, and mechanisms of killing. The results of this side-by-side comparison have implications for the development of CICs to treat HIV, as well as other conditions.


  • Open Access

    In vitro evaluation of anti-HIV radioimmunoconjugates labeled with astatine-211, thorium-227 and actinium-225

    by Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann, Donald K. Hamlin, Yawen Li, Xinyi Wang, Lily Li, Chris Orvig, Hans-Peter Kiem, Brenda M. Sandmaier, D. Scott Wilbur, Seth Pincus, et al.


  • Open Access

    A multiplexed barcode approach to simultaneously evaluate gene delivery by adeno-associated virus capsid variants in nonhuman primates

    by Nadja Meumann, Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann, Christopher W. Peterson, Hong Xie, Pavitra Roychoudhury, Michelle A. Loprieno, Xuan-Khang Vu, Daniel E. Strongin, Elizabeth J. Kenkel, Anoria Haick, et al.

    Background and Aims: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are widely used to deliver therapeutic transgenes to distinct tissues, including the liver. Vectors based on naturally occurring AAV serotypes as well as vectors using engineered capsids have shown variations in tissue tropism and level of transduction between different mouse models. Moreover, results obtained in rodents frequently lack translatability into large animal studies. In light of the increasing interest in AAV vectors for human gene therapy, an increasing number of studies are being performed in nonhuman primates. To keep animal numbers to a minimum and thus optimize the process of AAV capsid selection, we developed a multiplex barcoding approach to simultaneously evaluate the in vivo vector performance for a set of serotypes and capsid-engineered AAV vectors across multiple organs. Approach and Results: Vector biodistribution and transgene expression were assessed by quantitative PCR, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, vector DNA amplicon Illumina sequencing and vRNAseq in male and female rhesus macaques simultaneously dosed with a mixture of barcoded naturally occurring or engineered AAV vectors encoding the same transgene. As expected, our findings show animal-to-animal variation in both the biodistribution and tissue transduction pattern, which was partly influenced by each animal’s distinctive serological status. Conclusions: This method offers a robust approach to AAV vector optimization that can be used to identify and validate AAV vectors for gene delivery to potentially any anatomical site or cell type.