Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Anne-Sophie Kuhlmann has a total of 39 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hans-Peter Kiem
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
2 shared publications - Robert D. Harrington
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2 shared publications - Anoria Haick
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
1 shared publication Brenda M. Sandmaier
Translational Science & Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
1 shared publication- Brenda M. Sandmaier
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
1 shared publication Chris Orvig
Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 January 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibodies
- Vol. 15 (1) , 12
Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of Anti-HIV Immunotoxin, Antibody–Drug Conjugate, and Radioimmunoconjugate Targeted by the Same Antibody
Background: We are developing cytotoxic immunoconjugates (CICs) to eliminate HIV-infected cells. We investigated the efficacy and kinetics of killing by different forms of CICs targeted by the same monoclonal antibody (mAb), an immunotoxin (IT), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and radioimmunoconjugate (RIC). Methods: We compared in vitro effects of CICs made by conjugating anti-gp41 mAb 7B2 to deglycosylated ricin A chain (7B2-dgA), the anthracycline derivative PNU-159682 (7B2-PNU), or the α-emitting isotope actinium-225 (7B2-225Ac). Kinetic analyses of cell growth were performed measuring electrical impedance every 15 min over a 7-day period using cells stably expressing the HIV envelope and Env-negative parent cells. Results: 7B2-dgA and 7B2-225Ac were more potent and acted more rapidly to kill cells than 7B2-PNU. Both the 7B2-PNU and 7B2-225Ac induced bystander-cell killing, whereas the IT did not and consequently allowed the outgrowth of Env-negative cells. Low dose or brief exposure to 7B2-PNU resulted in an increased rate of cell growth. Conclusions: An IT, ADC, and RIC showed substantial differences in the degree of specific toxicity, kinetics, and mechanisms of killing. The results of this side-by-side comparison have implications for the development of CICs to treat HIV, as well as other conditions.
- 28 January 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibodies
- Vol. 15 (1) , 12
Open AccessComparative In Vitro Evaluation of Anti-HIV Immunotoxin, Antibody–Drug Conjugate, and Radioimmunoconjugate Targeted by the Same Antibody
Background: We are developing cytotoxic immunoconjugates (CICs) to eliminate HIV-infected cells. We investigated the efficacy and kinetics of killing by different forms of CICs targeted by the same monoclonal antibody (mAb), an immunotoxin (IT), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and radioimmunoconjugate (RIC). Methods: We compared in vitro effects of CICs made by conjugating anti-gp41 mAb 7B2 to deglycosylated ricin A chain (7B2-dgA), the anthracycline derivative PNU-159682 (7B2-PNU), or the α-emitting isotope actinium-225 (7B2-225Ac). Kinetic analyses of cell growth were performed measuring electrical impedance every 15 min over a 7-day period using cells stably expressing the HIV envelope and Env-negative parent cells. Results: 7B2-dgA and 7B2-225Ac were more potent and acted more rapidly to kill cells than 7B2-PNU. Both the 7B2-PNU and 7B2-225Ac induced bystander-cell killing, whereas the IT did not and consequently allowed the outgrowth of Env-negative cells. Low dose or brief exposure to 7B2-PNU resulted in an increased rate of cell growth. Conclusions: An IT, ADC, and RIC showed substantial differences in the degree of specific toxicity, kinetics, and mechanisms of killing. The results of this side-by-side comparison have implications for the development of CICs to treat HIV, as well as other conditions.
- Open Access
- 24 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Medicine and Biology
- Vol. 154-155, 109602
In vitro evaluation of anti-HIV radioimmunoconjugates labeled with astatine-211, thorium-227 and actinium-225
- 24 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Medicine and Biology
- Vol. 154-155, 109602
Open AccessIn vitro evaluation of anti-HIV radioimmunoconjugates labeled with astatine-211, thorium-227 and actinium-225
- Open Access
- 20 January 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology Communications
- Vol. 7 (2) , e0009
A multiplexed barcode approach to simultaneously evaluate gene delivery by adeno-associated virus capsid variants in nonhuman primates
Background and Aims: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are widely used to deliver therapeutic transgenes to distinct tissues, including the liver. Vectors based on naturally occurring AAV serotypes as well as vectors using engineered capsids have shown variations in tissue tropism and level of transduction between different mouse models. Moreover, results obtained in rodents frequently lack translatability into large animal studies. In light of the increasing interest in AAV vectors for human gene therapy, an increasing number of studies are being performed in nonhuman primates. To keep animal numbers to a minimum and thus optimize the process of AAV capsid selection, we developed a multiplex barcoding approach to simultaneously evaluate the in vivo vector performance for a set of serotypes and capsid-engineered AAV vectors across multiple organs. Approach and Results: Vector biodistribution and transgene expression were assessed by quantitative PCR, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, vector DNA amplicon Illumina sequencing and vRNAseq in male and female rhesus macaques simultaneously dosed with a mixture of barcoded naturally occurring or engineered AAV vectors encoding the same transgene. As expected, our findings show animal-to-animal variation in both the biodistribution and tissue transduction pattern, which was partly influenced by each animal’s distinctive serological status. Conclusions: This method offers a robust approach to AAV vector optimization that can be used to identify and validate AAV vectors for gene delivery to potentially any anatomical site or cell type.
- 20 January 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology Communications
- Vol. 7 (2) , e0009
Open AccessA multiplexed barcode approach to simultaneously evaluate gene delivery by adeno-associated virus capsid variants in nonhuman primates
Background and Aims: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are widely used to deliver therapeutic transgenes to distinct tissues, including the liver. Vectors based on naturally occurring AAV serotypes as well as vectors using engineered capsids have shown variations in tissue tropism and level of transduction between different mouse models. Moreover, results obtained in rodents frequently lack translatability into large animal studies. In light of the increasing interest in AAV vectors for human gene therapy, an increasing number of studies are being performed in nonhuman primates. To keep animal numbers to a minimum and thus optimize the process of AAV capsid selection, we developed a multiplex barcoding approach to simultaneously evaluate the in vivo vector performance for a set of serotypes and capsid-engineered AAV vectors across multiple organs. Approach and Results: Vector biodistribution and transgene expression were assessed by quantitative PCR, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, vector DNA amplicon Illumina sequencing and vRNAseq in male and female rhesus macaques simultaneously dosed with a mixture of barcoded naturally occurring or engineered AAV vectors encoding the same transgene. As expected, our findings show animal-to-animal variation in both the biodistribution and tissue transduction pattern, which was partly influenced by each animal’s distinctive serological status. Conclusions: This method offers a robust approach to AAV vector optimization that can be used to identify and validate AAV vectors for gene delivery to potentially any anatomical site or cell type.