Angela L. Neville

Obesity is a well-established risk factor for perioperative morbidity and recurrence in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). To mitigate poor outcomes, body mass index (BMI) is increasingly used as a preoperative optimization metric, with some surgeons only offering elective VHR to patients of a predetermined BMI threshold (cutoff). While substantial evidence supports improved outcomes for lower BMI patients, the options for VHR are extremely nuanced with multiple techniques, mesh, and even surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). Consequently, using BMI as a binary decision-making tool remains controversial. This narrative summarizes the existing literature on BMI thresholds and outcomes following VHR. We examine the relationship between BMI and postoperative complications, recurrence, and quality of life for open and minimally invasive VHR. We also review evidence regarding BMI-based deferral strategies, emergency repair risk, and health disparities and discuss the role of preoperative optimization within a broader risk assessment framework.

Background: High-grade hepatic trauma can be devastating, with complications being common if patients survive. Studies comparing outcome differences between blunt and penetrating mechanism are lacking. This study aimed to describe and evaluate the association of traumatic mechanism with complications in patients sustaining grades IV and V liver injuries. Methods: A retrospective review of all adults who suffered grades IV and V liver injury from 2015-2020 was performed at a level I trauma center in an urban area. Outcomes in patients with blunt and penetrating mechanisms were compared. Results: A total of 103 patients were included, of which 44 (43%) were penetrating and the remainder blunt. Patients with penetrating injuries were younger, more often male, and more likely to undergo initial operative management (82% vs 40%, P < .001). Regardless of mechanism, high grade liver injuries had similar rates of complications, including bile leak (17% vs 23%, P = .559) and intrabdominal abscess (7% vs 16%, P = .239), and similar need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (12% vs 19%, P = .379). Penetrating injuries required more re-interventions (42% vs 19%, P = .033), specifically more percutaneous drainage procedures (36% vs 12%, P = .016). Overall mortality was 29% and did not differ by mechanism. Discussion: Morbidity and mortality are high for grades IV and V liver injuries. Penetrating high-grade hepatic injuries are more likely to be managed operatively, but mortality and overall complications are similar to blunt mechanisms. This may allow for uniform algorithms to define management strategies regardless of mechanism.

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are aggressive infections associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite multiple predictive models for the identification of NSTI, a subset of patients will not have an NSTI at the time of surgical exploration. We hypothesized there is a subset of patients without NSTI who are clinically indistinguishable from those with NSTI. We aimed to characterize the differences between NSTI and non-NSTI patients and describe a negative exploration rate for this disease process.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing surgical exploration for suspected NSTI at our county-funded, academic-affiliated medical center between 2008 and 2015. Patients were identified as having NSTI or not (non-NSTI) based on surgical findings at the initial operation. Pathology reports were reviewed to confirm diagnosis. The NSTI and non-NSTI patients were compared using χ²test, Fisher’s exact test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. A p value 3, p=0.02) and glucose levels (244 vs. 114 mg/dL, p<0.0001), but lower sodium values (130 vs. 134 mmol/L, p≤0.0001) and less violaceous skin changes (9.2% vs. 23.8%, p=0.004). Eight patients (14%) initially diagnosed with cellulitis had an NSTI diagnosed on return to the operating room for failure to improve.Conclusions: Clinical differences between NSTI and non-NSTI patients are subtle. We found a 20% negative exploration rate for suspected NSTI. Close postoperative attention to this cohort is warranted as a small subset may progress.Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort study, level III.