Emily Azcue
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Emily Azcue has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aaron P. Esser-Kahn
Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering The University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
1 shared publication Albert Jeon
Moderna Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
1 shared publication- Alexander Bukreyev
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
1 shared publication - Ana Cadete
Moderna Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
1 shared publication Andrea Carfi
Moderna Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
1 shared publicationAnne Golding
Moderna Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 July 2025
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 14
Bioengineering approaches to trained immunity: Physiologic targets and therapeutic strategies
Trained immunity presents a unique target for modulating the immune response against infectious and non-infectious threats to human health. To address the unmet need for training-targeted therapies, we explore bioengineering methods to answer research questions and address clinical applications. Current challenges in trained immunity include self-propagating autoinflammatory disease, a lack of controllable cell and tissue specificity, and the unintentional induction of training by known drugs and diseases. The bioengineering tools discussed in this review (nanotherapeutics, biomechanical modulation, cellular engineering, and machine learning) could address these challenges by providing additional avenues to modulate and interrogate trained immunity. The preferential activation of peripheral or central training has not yet been achieved and could be accessed using nanoparticle systems. Targeted delivery of training stimuli using nanocarriers can enrich the response in various cell and organ systems, while also selectively activating peripheral training in the local tissues or central trained immunity in bone marrow progenitor cells. Beyond chemical- or pathogen-based activation of training, force-based cues, such as interaction with mechanoreceptors, can induce trained phenotypes in many cell types. Mechanotransduction influences immune cell activation, motility, and morphology and could be harnessed as a tool to modulate training states in next-generation therapies. For known genetic and epigenetic mediators of trained immunity, cellular engineering could precisely activate or deactivate programs of training. Genetic engineering could be particularly useful in generating trained cell-based therapies like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) macrophages. Finally, machine learning models, which are rapidly transforming biomedical research, can be employed to identify signatures of trained immunity in pre-existing datasets. They can also predict protein targets for previously identified inducers of trained immunity by modeling drug-protein or protein-protein interactions in silico. By harnessing the modular techniques of bioengineering for applications in trained immunity, training-based therapies can be more efficiently translated into clinical practice.
- 23 July 2025
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife
- Vol. 14
Open AccessBioengineering approaches to trained immunity: Physiologic targets and therapeutic strategies
Trained immunity presents a unique target for modulating the immune response against infectious and non-infectious threats to human health. To address the unmet need for training-targeted therapies, we explore bioengineering methods to answer research questions and address clinical applications. Current challenges in trained immunity include self-propagating autoinflammatory disease, a lack of controllable cell and tissue specificity, and the unintentional induction of training by known drugs and diseases. The bioengineering tools discussed in this review (nanotherapeutics, biomechanical modulation, cellular engineering, and machine learning) could address these challenges by providing additional avenues to modulate and interrogate trained immunity. The preferential activation of peripheral or central training has not yet been achieved and could be accessed using nanoparticle systems. Targeted delivery of training stimuli using nanocarriers can enrich the response in various cell and organ systems, while also selectively activating peripheral training in the local tissues or central trained immunity in bone marrow progenitor cells. Beyond chemical- or pathogen-based activation of training, force-based cues, such as interaction with mechanoreceptors, can induce trained phenotypes in many cell types. Mechanotransduction influences immune cell activation, motility, and morphology and could be harnessed as a tool to modulate training states in next-generation therapies. For known genetic and epigenetic mediators of trained immunity, cellular engineering could precisely activate or deactivate programs of training. Genetic engineering could be particularly useful in generating trained cell-based therapies like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) macrophages. Finally, machine learning models, which are rapidly transforming biomedical research, can be employed to identify signatures of trained immunity in pre-existing datasets. They can also predict protein targets for previously identified inducers of trained immunity by modeling drug-protein or protein-protein interactions in silico. By harnessing the modular techniques of bioengineering for applications in trained immunity, training-based therapies can be more efficiently translated into clinical practice.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 22 September 2023
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 9 (38) , eadh1655
Intranasal mRNA-LNP vaccination protects hamsters from SARS-CoV-2 infection
Intranasal vaccination represents a promising approach for preventing disease caused by respiratory pathogens by eliciting a mucosal immune response in the respiratory tract that may act as an early barrier to infection and transmission. This study investigated immunogenicity and protective efficacy of intranasally administered messenger RNA (mRNA)–lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encapsulated vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Syrian golden hamsters. Intranasal mRNA-LNP vaccination systemically induced spike-specific binding [immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA] and neutralizing antibodies. Intranasally vaccinated hamsters also had decreased viral loads in the respiratory tract, reduced lung pathology, and prevented weight loss after SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Together, this study demonstrates successful immunogenicity and protection against respiratory viral infection by an intranasally administered mRNA-LNP vaccine.
- 22 September 2023
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Advances
- Vol. 9 (38) , eadh1655
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessIntranasal mRNA-LNP vaccination protects hamsters from SARS-CoV-2 infection
Intranasal vaccination represents a promising approach for preventing disease caused by respiratory pathogens by eliciting a mucosal immune response in the respiratory tract that may act as an early barrier to infection and transmission. This study investigated immunogenicity and protective efficacy of intranasally administered messenger RNA (mRNA)–lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encapsulated vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Syrian golden hamsters. Intranasal mRNA-LNP vaccination systemically induced spike-specific binding [immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA] and neutralizing antibodies. Intranasally vaccinated hamsters also had decreased viral loads in the respiratory tract, reduced lung pathology, and prevented weight loss after SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Together, this study demonstrates successful immunogenicity and protection against respiratory viral infection by an intranasally administered mRNA-LNP vaccine.