Vincenzo Insinga

Background: Neonatal sepsis caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens poses significant therapeutic challenges in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), particularly in surgical neonates. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, offers activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC, and serine carbapenemases, but neonatal experience remains limited. Methods and Results: We present a 35-week preterm neonate with long-gap esophageal atresia who developed late-onset sepsis caused by MDR Enterobacter hormaechei, including a KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant isolate, during postoperative recovery. After a multidisciplinary review, the patient received off-label CAZ-AVI at 25 mg/kg/dose (20/5 mg/kg) every 8 h, infused over 2 h, informed by available neonatal pharmacokinetic evidence and weight-adjusted dosing recommendations. Amikacin was administered contextually. Consecutive blood cultures obtained 48–72 h after dual antibiotic therapy initiation became negative and remained sterile, with concordant decline in inflammatory biomarkers, confirming rapid microbiological clearance. Unfortunately, the newborn died in the hours immediately following the final surgery performed to repair the esophageal atresia via end-to-end anastomosis; the cause was complications (hemothorax) unrelated to infectious diseases, although the onset of such severe sepsis may have compromised an already impaired immunological status. Discussion: This case shows mechanism-concordant antimicrobial selection and the feasibility of neonatal dosing when MDR Enterobacterales drive invasive infection. Our experience supports prospective evaluation of CAZ-AVI in carefully selected septic newborns while emphasizing the importance of rapid carbapenemase genotyping, susceptibility testing, and multidisciplinary oversight.

Background: The first 1000 days of life, from conception to 2 years of age, represent a critical window during which nutrition can exert long-lasting effects on neurodevelopment, immune maturation, and susceptibility to prematurity-related morbidity. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a key structural n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid of the brain and retina, characterized by rapid fetal accretion during the third trimester. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of studies published from March 2015 up to December 2025, including randomized controlled trials, follow-up studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses about DHA supplementation during pregnancy, lactation, infancy and early childhood, and its role on development. Results: Across the first 1000 days, DHA supplementation improves biochemical DHA status, particularly in populations with low baseline levels (moderate to high level of evidence), while clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous. During pregnancy, some benefits in specific cognitive and behavioral domains have been demonstrated, whereas effects on global cognition and long-term behavior are frequently null (moderate evidence). Visual outcomes appear favorable, with improvements in visual acuity (moderate evidence). In preterm infants, enteral DHA—often combined with arachidonic acid (ARA)—is feasible and well tolerated. DHA may reduce inflammatory markers and necrotizing enterocolitis risk when in equilibrium with ARA (low to moderate evidence), while no evidence supports the link between DHA and reduced risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and retinopathy of prematurity (moderate evidence). Neurodevelopmental outcomes are mixed: neuroimaging studies suggest enhanced white matter maturation with DHA + ARA, whereas most trials show no clear benefit regarding standardized developmental scores (moderate evidence). Conclusions: DHA is biologically essential during the first 1000 days, but its clinical impact depends on timing, dose, baseline status, and prematurity-related context. The balance between DHA and ARA, rather than DHA supplementation alone, emerges as a key determinant of clinical efficacy, supporting a shift toward precision-based nutritional strategies in early life.

The discovery of antimicrobial drugs has led to a significant increase in survival from infections; however, they are very often prescribed and administered, even when their use is not necessary and appropriate. Newborns are particularly exposed to infections due to the poor effectiveness and the immaturity of their immune systems. For this reason, in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), the use of antimicrobial drugs is often decisive and life-saving, and it must be started promptly to ensure its effectiveness in consideration of the possible rapid evolution of the infection towards sepsis. Nevertheless, the misuse of antibiotics in the neonatal period leads not only to an increase in the development and wide spreading of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but it is also associated with various short-term (e.g., alterations of the microbiota) and long-term (e.g., increased risk of allergic disease and obesity) effects. It appears fundamental to use antibiotics only when strictly necessary; specific decision-making algorithms and electronic calculators can help limit the use of unnecessary antibiotic drugs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the right balance between the risks and benefits of antimicrobial therapy in NICUs; for this purpose, specific Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in neonatal care and the creation of a specific antimicrobial stewardship team are requested.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a topic of concern, especially in high-level care departments like neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The systematic use of an “active” epidemiological surveillance system allows us to observe and analyze any changes in microbial distribution, limiting the risk of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) development. Methods: We have conducted a longitudinal observational study in the five NICUs of Palermo, comparing the “pre-pandemic period” (March 2014–February 2020) with the “pandemic” one (March 2020–February 2022). The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the cumulative prevalence of carriage from multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in the cumulative NICUs (NICU C). Results: During the “pre-pandemic period”, 9407 swabs were collected (4707 rectal, 4700 nasal); on the contrary, during the “pandemic period”, a total of 2687 swabs were collected (1345 rectal, 1342 nasal). A statistically significant decrease in MDR-Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) carriage prevalence was detected during the pandemic. At the same time, there was a general worsening of the carriage of carbapenemase-forming MDR-GNB (CARBA-R+) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) during the pandemic period. A significant reduction in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) carriage was detected too. Conclusions: The surveillance of MDRO carriage in NICUs is fundamental for limiting the social and economic burden of HAIs.