Joan Wawire
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Joan Wawire has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Brian L. McGowan
School of Education American University Washington DC USA
1 shared publication - Jeannette Alarcon
Department of Curriculum and Instruction University of Houston Houston Texas USA
1 shared publication - Jerrod A. Henderson
University of Houston
1 shared publication - Kristin L. Schaefer
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Houston Houston Texas USA
1 shared publication - Le Shorn S. Benjamin
William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering University of Houston Houston Texas USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 September 2023
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Engineering Education
- Vol. 112 (4) , 1145-1166
Photovoice: Visualizing the engineering identity experiences of sophomore students
Background: Researchers have shown that students leave undergraduate engineering programs during the first 2 years. Justifiably, many studies have tried to tackle engineering student persistence and attrition, especially during the first year, and then developed interventions to address the challenges. Although those interventions have improved freshmen retention in some institutions, less has been published on the impacts of these interventions on the sophomore student experience.Purpose: To contribute to the knowledge base about all engineering students, we examined the experiences of sophomore engineering students and explored how these experiences might be related to their identities as engineers.Design/Method: We conducted this study using photovoice, a methodology in which participants submit photographs to describe their experiences and give recommendations on improving their experiences and resolving their concerns. Participants submitted three sets of pictures (at the beginning, middle, and end of the semester) and participated in focus groups to aid in illuminating their experiences. We analyzed data using thematic analysis.Results: We inductively determined three themes: on the frame, out of focus, and prefigures. These themes illustrate the experiences of sophomore engineering students, enabling us to see what interest, competence, and recognition as engineers looked like from their perspectives.Conclusions: Participants grappled with the tension between their personal, social, and engineering identities. Photovoice empowered them to author and illustrate that they could exist beyond the murky middle.
- 15 September 2023
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Engineering Education
- Vol. 112 (4) , 1145-1166
Open AccessPhotovoice: Visualizing the engineering identity experiences of sophomore students
Background: Researchers have shown that students leave undergraduate engineering programs during the first 2 years. Justifiably, many studies have tried to tackle engineering student persistence and attrition, especially during the first year, and then developed interventions to address the challenges. Although those interventions have improved freshmen retention in some institutions, less has been published on the impacts of these interventions on the sophomore student experience.Purpose: To contribute to the knowledge base about all engineering students, we examined the experiences of sophomore engineering students and explored how these experiences might be related to their identities as engineers.Design/Method: We conducted this study using photovoice, a methodology in which participants submit photographs to describe their experiences and give recommendations on improving their experiences and resolving their concerns. Participants submitted three sets of pictures (at the beginning, middle, and end of the semester) and participated in focus groups to aid in illuminating their experiences. We analyzed data using thematic analysis.Results: We inductively determined three themes: on the frame, out of focus, and prefigures. These themes illustrate the experiences of sophomore engineering students, enabling us to see what interest, competence, and recognition as engineers looked like from their perspectives.Conclusions: Participants grappled with the tension between their personal, social, and engineering identities. Photovoice empowered them to author and illustrate that they could exist beyond the murky middle.