Andrei-Lucian Marian

The sustainable integration of technology into educational practices is pivotal for modern teaching and learning. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study explores the psychological and contextual factors that influence technology acceptance among pre-service and in-service teachers. Employing a nonexperimental, cross-sectional design, data were collected from 347 participants to examine the relationships between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward use, behavioural intention, and actual system use. Results indicate that pre-service teachers demonstrate stronger openness to technology adoption, driven primarily by attitudinal factors, whereas in-service teachers’ acceptance is more closely linked to perceived utility and usability. This study advances the TAM by integrating a dual serial mediation model and testing the moderating role of professional status, thereby offering a nuanced understanding of sustainable digital engagement across career stages. Our findings underscore the importance of fostering positive perceptions and providing differentiated support throughout teachers’ professional trajectories to achieve long-term, meaningful technology adoption in education.

This study examines the effectiveness of a predictive model for risky driving behavior among young adults, focusing on psychological factors such as self-deceptive enhancement, impression management, emotional regulation difficulties, and perceived behavioral control. Additionally, it explores the mediating effect of mindfulness on the relationship between self-deceptive enhancement and risky driving behavior, with an emphasis on sustainable driving practices. Using a nonexperimental, cross-sectional design, the study investigates risky driving behavior among young Romanian drivers through a quantitative methodology. Data were collected from 436 participants using a pretested and adapted set of questionnaires (CR, PDS, ICI, DERS, MAAS). The analysis was conducted with SPSS (version 20) and Hayes’s PROCESS tool. The findings indicate that impression management strongly predicts risky driving behavior. The model’s efficiency differs by gender: for drivers who are men, impression management and perceived behavioral control are crucial predictors, whereas for drivers who are women, impression management and self-deceptive enhancement are more significant. Moreover, the study identifies a significant indirect effect of self-deceptive enhancement on risky driving behavior through mindfulness. Specifically, lower levels of self-deceptive enhancement indirectly reduce risky driving behaviors by fostering mindfulness, which promotes adaptive and sustainable driving styles and consequently encourages safer driving practices.

The purpose of this study was to examine the explanatory power of a predictive model of bully/perpetrator behaviour in Romanian athletes, consisting of negative pre-competitive emotions (anxiety, sadness, and anger), perception of male gender normativity, and relationships with coaches and teammates. Additionally, we aimed to explore the mediation effect of bully–victim behaviour on the relationship between athletes’ connections with their coaches and bully/perpetrator behaviour. The current research involved a nonexperimental, cross-sectional design exploring the presence of bully/perpetrator behaviour in Romanian male and female athletes. The quantitative methodology was used to collect and analyse the data obtained. Researchers translated, adapted and pretested the questionnaire set to the Romanian cultural background (SEQ, MAMS, CART-Q, In-group Ties Scale, BSQ) before distributing it to 448 participants. 58.7% were male participants, and 41.3% were female participants. The mean age was 21.15 (SDage = 2.37, range = 18–32). The research was conducted in the first half of 2023. SPSS (V. 20) and Hayes’s PROCESS tool were used to investigate the data. The findings demonstrated that in the case of Romanian male athletes, perception of male gender normativity, anger, and weaker connections with coaches are the most important psychological factors in predicting bully/perpetrator behaviour. In contrast, in the case of Romanian female athletes, only weaker connections with coaches and perception of male gender normativity play an essential role in explaining bully/perpetrator behaviour. Additionally, the study demonstrated that bully–victim behaviour mediates the relationship between athletes’ weaker connections with their coaches and bully/perpetrator behaviour. Athletes’ weaker connections with their coaches lead to experiencing a high level of bully/perpetrator behaviour by stressing bully–victim behaviour, which also contributes to achieving a high level of bully/perpetrator behaviour.