Hongmei Liu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Hongmei Liu has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Huping Shang
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China
3 shared publicationsHaina Yan
School of Politics and Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
1 shared publication- Huping Shang
University of Science and Technology of China
1 shared publication Jianglong Yu
1 shared publication- Jianglong Yu
Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, PR China; China Academy of Corporate Governance, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
1 shared publication - Ke Liu
School of Business, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 8 August 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Economic Analysis and Policy
- Vol. 87, 2534-2553
The impact of capital market enforcement intensity on corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China
- 8 August 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Economic Analysis and Policy
- Vol. 87, 2534-2553
The impact of capital market enforcement intensity on corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China
- 22 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 201, 114812
Why waste sorting implementation remains ineffective: A theoretical analysis based on the generation process of waste sorting behavior in China
- 22 April 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 201, 114812
Why waste sorting implementation remains ineffective: A theoretical analysis based on the generation process of waste sorting behavior in China
- Open Access
- 13 May 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-11
Unveiling the origins of non-performance-oriented behavior in China’s local governments: a game theory perspective on the performance-based promotion system
- 13 May 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-11
Open AccessUnveiling the origins of non-performance-oriented behavior in China’s local governments: a game theory perspective on the performance-based promotion system
- Open Access
- 20 October 2023
- Published by Wiley
Understanding the Role of External Events in Major Policy Change: The Case of Abolition of China’s Labor Reeducation System
External events impact significant policy changes. This study integrates the Advocacy Coalition Framework, Multiple Streams model, and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory to analyze how external events influenced China’s abolition of the Labor Reeducation System (LRS). Findings show that external events broke through decision makers’ attention constraints, shifted power dynamics, and created an opportunity for change. Limited learning occurred within coalitions as a tactical response to shocks, while intercoalition learning resulted from higher authorities’ interference. Destabilizing events reduce consensus requirements and reinforce China’s authoritarian decision-making style. The role of external events depends on their alignment with the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) ideology and political interests.
- 20 October 2023
- Published by Wiley
Open AccessUnderstanding the Role of External Events in Major Policy Change: The Case of Abolition of China’s Labor Reeducation System
External events impact significant policy changes. This study integrates the Advocacy Coalition Framework, Multiple Streams model, and Punctuated Equilibrium Theory to analyze how external events influenced China’s abolition of the Labor Reeducation System (LRS). Findings show that external events broke through decision makers’ attention constraints, shifted power dynamics, and created an opportunity for change. Limited learning occurred within coalitions as a tactical response to shocks, while intercoalition learning resulted from higher authorities’ interference. Destabilizing events reduce consensus requirements and reinforce China’s authoritarian decision-making style. The role of external events depends on their alignment with the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) ideology and political interests.
- 25 September 2023
- Published by SAGE Publications in Chinese Public Administration Review
- Vol. 14 (4) , 199-223
The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district
Government performance evaluation has a long history. However, major differences of opinion regarding its role still exist both in Western and Chinese academia, from theoretical, and practical perspectives. In this article, we conduct an empirical measurement of the role played by government performance evaluation and construct a regression model to explore the major factors influencing public officials’ perception, relying on survey data from a district government of county level in Guangdong Province. The study reveals that the average value of 14 items measuring government performance evaluation was 3.36 points (out of a possible 5 points). The role of the government in setting annual objectives, tasks, and priorities, as well as strategic planning, and target setting, and strengthening departmental accountability, had the most significant effect on the perception of efficacy of performance evaluation, whereas departmental budget setting, resource allocation, and reduction of operating costs had the least effect. Furthermore, performance communication and feedback, as well as the validity of the performance indicator system, also significantly influence the perception of the role played by government performance evaluation. The article concludes with a discussion of the differences between government performance evaluation in the West and in China.
- 25 September 2023
- Published by SAGE Publications in Chinese Public Administration Review
- Vol. 14 (4) , 199-223
The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district
Government performance evaluation has a long history. However, major differences of opinion regarding its role still exist both in Western and Chinese academia, from theoretical, and practical perspectives. In this article, we conduct an empirical measurement of the role played by government performance evaluation and construct a regression model to explore the major factors influencing public officials’ perception, relying on survey data from a district government of county level in Guangdong Province. The study reveals that the average value of 14 items measuring government performance evaluation was 3.36 points (out of a possible 5 points). The role of the government in setting annual objectives, tasks, and priorities, as well as strategic planning, and target setting, and strengthening departmental accountability, had the most significant effect on the perception of efficacy of performance evaluation, whereas departmental budget setting, resource allocation, and reduction of operating costs had the least effect. Furthermore, performance communication and feedback, as well as the validity of the performance indicator system, also significantly influence the perception of the role played by government performance evaluation. The article concludes with a discussion of the differences between government performance evaluation in the West and in China.