Menghan Chen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Menghan Chen has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jianying Feng
School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
2 shared publications - Gang Wu
Savid School of Stomatology, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
1 shared publication - Jianyun Jiang
School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
1 shared publication - Jing Jiang
School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China
1 shared publication - Lei Wang
Department of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
1 shared publication Yiyang Du
School/Hospital of Stomatology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Oral Health
- Vol. 26 (1)
Construction of caries risk assessment scale and oral microecology analysis of adolescents with fixed orthodontic treatment
This study aimed to develop and initially validate a caries risk assessment scale for adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and to explorator
- 25 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Oral Health
- Vol. 26 (1)
Open AccessConstruction of caries risk assessment scale and oral microecology analysis of adolescents with fixed orthodontic treatment
This study aimed to develop and initially validate a caries risk assessment scale for adolescents undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and to explorator
- Open Access
- 12 October 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Functional Biomaterials
- Vol. 14 (10) , 513
Hst1/Gel-MA Scaffold Significantly Promotes the Quality of Osteochondral Regeneration in the Temporomandibular Joint
Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the capacity of the human salivary histatin-1-functionalized methacrylic gelatin scaffold to control osteochondral tissue regeneration and repair in vivo in rabbits with major temporomandibular joint dimensional abnormalities. Materials and Methods: In order to compare human salivary histatin-1-functionalized methacrylic gelatin scaffolds to the Blank and Gel-MA hydrogel groups, scaffolds were implanted into osteochondral lesions of a critical size (3 × 3 mm) in the anterior region of the condyle of the temporomandibular joint in New Zealand white rabbits. At 4 weeks after implantation, the repair was evaluated using macroscopic examination, histology, and micro-CT analysis. Results: In the comparison of the composite scaffold group with the Blank and Gel-MA groups, analysis of the healed tissue revealed an improved macroscopic appearance in the composite scaffold group. Regeneration was induced by host cell migration in the Hst1/Gel-MA scaffold group. Conclusions: The current study offers a viable method for in vivo cartilage repair that does not require cell transplantation. Future clinical applications of this strategy’s optimization have many potential advantages.
- 12 October 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Functional Biomaterials
- Vol. 14 (10) , 513
Open AccessHst1/Gel-MA Scaffold Significantly Promotes the Quality of Osteochondral Regeneration in the Temporomandibular Joint
Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the capacity of the human salivary histatin-1-functionalized methacrylic gelatin scaffold to control osteochondral tissue regeneration and repair in vivo in rabbits with major temporomandibular joint dimensional abnormalities. Materials and Methods: In order to compare human salivary histatin-1-functionalized methacrylic gelatin scaffolds to the Blank and Gel-MA hydrogel groups, scaffolds were implanted into osteochondral lesions of a critical size (3 × 3 mm) in the anterior region of the condyle of the temporomandibular joint in New Zealand white rabbits. At 4 weeks after implantation, the repair was evaluated using macroscopic examination, histology, and micro-CT analysis. Results: In the comparison of the composite scaffold group with the Blank and Gel-MA groups, analysis of the healed tissue revealed an improved macroscopic appearance in the composite scaffold group. Regeneration was induced by host cell migration in the Hst1/Gel-MA scaffold group. Conclusions: The current study offers a viable method for in vivo cartilage repair that does not require cell transplantation. Future clinical applications of this strategy’s optimization have many potential advantages.