LNLjubica Nedelkoska

Ljubica Nedelkoska

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Ljubica Nedelkoska has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    De facto Openness to Immigration

    by Ljubica Nedelkoska, Diego Martin, Alexia Lochmann, Ricardo Hausmann, Dany Bahar, Muhammed A. Yildirim

    Various factors influence why some countries are more open to immigration than others. Policy is only one of them. We design country-specific measures of openness to immigration that aim to capture de facto levels of openness to immigration, complementing existing de jure measures of immigration, based on enacted immigration laws and policy measures. We estimate these for 148 countries and three years (2000, 2010, and 2020). For a subset of countries, we also distinguish between openness towards tertiary-educated migrants and less than tertiary-educated migrants. Using the measures, we show that most places in the World today are closed to immigration, and a few regions are very open. The World became more open in the first decade of the millennium, an opening mainly driven by the Western World and the Gulf countries. Moreover, we show that other factors equal, countries that increased their openness to immigration, reduced their old-age dependency ratios, and experienced slower real wage growth, arguably a sign of relaxing labor and skill shortages.

  • Skill mismatch and the costs of job displacement

    by Frank Neffke, Ljubica Nedelkoska, Simon Wiederhold


  • Open Access

    Mental health concerns precede quits: shifts in the work discourse during the Covid-19 pandemic and great resignation

    by R. Maria del Rio-Chanona, Alejandro Hermida-Carrillo, Melody Sepahpour-Fard, Luning Sun, Renata Topinkova, Ljubica Nedelkoska

    To study the causes of the 2021 Great Resignation, we use text analysis and investigate the changes in work- and quit-related posts between 2018 and 2021 on Reddit. We find that the Reddit discourse evolution resembles the dynamics of the U.S. quit and layoff rates. Furthermore, when the COVID-19 pandemic started, conversations related to working from home, switching jobs, work-related distress, and mental health increased, while discussions on commuting or moving for a job decreased. We distinguish between general work-related and specific quit-related discourse changes using a difference-in-differences method. Our main finding is that mental health and work-related distress topics disproportionally increased among quit-related posts since the onset of the pandemic, likely contributing to the quits of the Great Resignation. Along with better labor market conditions, some relief came beginning-to-mid-2021 when these concerns decreased. Our study underscores the importance of having access to data from online forums, such as Reddit, to study emerging economic phenomena in real time, providing a valuable supplement to traditional labor market surveys and administrative data.


  • Open Access

    Mental health concerns prelude the Great Resignation: Evidence from Social Media

    by Rita Maria del Rio Chanona, Alejandro Hermida-Carrilo, Melody Sepahpour-Fard, Luning Sun, Renata Topinkova, Ljubica Nedelkoska

    To study the causes of the 2021 Great Resignation, we use text analysis to investigate the changes in work- and quit-related posts between 2018 and 2021 on Reddit. We find that the Reddit discourse evolution resembles the dynamics of the U.S. quit and layoff rates. Furthermore, when the COVID-19 pandemic started, conversations related to working from home, switching jobs, work-related distress, and mental health increased. We distinguish between general work-related and specific quit-related discourse changes using a difference-in-differences method. Our main finding is that mental health and work-related distress topics disproportionally increased among quit-related posts since the onset of the pandemic, likely contributing to the Great Resignation. Along with better labor market conditions, some relief came beginning-to-mid-2021 when these concerns decreased. Our study validates the use of forums such as Reddit for studying emerging economic phenomena in real time, complementing traditional labor market surveys and administrative data.


  • Occupations at risk: job tasks, job security, and wages

    by Ljubica Nedelkoska

    Germany, similar to other developed countries, witnessed a sharp decline in jobs that used to constitute the middle class in the 1970s and 1980s. This decline has been associated with the level to which jobs are codifiable. There is evidence that codifiable tasks are more prone to technological substitution and outsourcing compared with tacit tasks. This article empirically investigates two crucial aspects of the decline in codified jobs. First, it studies what happened to workers in codified occupations in terms of unemployment, occupational change, and wages. Second, it revisits the hypothesis that code-based technologies are the major driver of this labor market shift. We find that job codification is associated with both higher unemployment and higher occupational change. It is also associated with wage losses for workers who left routinized jobs. We find, however, little evidence that code-based technologies were the driving factor behind these dynamics.