ALArnhold Lohse

Arnhold Lohse

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Arnhold Lohse has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Control of end-tidal carbon dioxide during phrenic nerve stimulation with mechanical ventilation

    by Arnhold Lohse, Felix Röhren, Philip von Platen, Carl-Friedrich Benner, Dmitrij Ziles, Marius Hühn, Matthias Manfred Deininger, Thomas Breuer, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter

  • Open Access

    ROBUST CONTROL OF OXYGEN SATURATION DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION

    by Arnhold Lohse, Philip Von Platen, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter

    Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a disease that has a high reported mortality rate. The treatment for ARDS typically involves mechanical ventilation that is tailored to each patient's needs. A crucial aspect of this treatment is maintaining adequate oxygen saturation of haemoglobin by setting the fraction of inspired oxygen. This paper proposes a design method of robust proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers using a gas exchange model during ARDS. Several PID controllers were synthesized for different sub-operational ranges defined by measurable quantities of the mechanical ventilator and the patient using a mixed sensitivity H∞ approach. In simulations, the controller demonstrated high robustness to external changes and changes in the patient's condition, with saturation always above 88%. Although further validation of the controller is required, the results indicate that the presented robust control method has the potential to be clinically relevant.


  • A physiological model of phrenic nerve excitation by electrical stimulation

    by Arnhold Lohse, Arnhold Lohse, Matthias Manfred Deininger, Matthias Manfred Deininger, Johannes Loeser, Johannes Loeser, Felix Roehren, Felix Roehren, Dmitrij Ziles, Dmitrij Ziles, et al.

    Mechanical ventilation is essential in intensive care treatment but leads to diaphragmatic atrophy, which in turn contributes to prolonged weaning and increased mortality. One approach to prevent diaphragmatic atrophy while achieving pulmonary ventilation is electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve. To automize phrenic nerve stimulation resulting in lung protective tidal volumes with lowest possible currents, mathematical models are required. Nerve stimulation models are often complex, so many parameters have to be identified prior to implementation. This paper presents a novel, simplified approach to model phrenic nerve excitation to obtain an individualized patient model using a few data points. The latter is based on the idea that nerve fibers are excited when the electric field exceeds a threshold. The effect of the geometry parameter on the model output was analyzed, and the model was validated with measurement data from a pig trial (RMSE in between 0.44 × 10−2 and 1.64 × 10−2 for parameterized models). The modeled phrenic nerve excitation behaved similarly to the measured tidal volumes, and thus could be used to develop automated phrenic nerve stimulation systems for lung protective ventilation.


  • Robust closed-loop control of systemic oxygenation in acute lung injury

    by Philip von Platen, Adel Abdelsamed, Arnhold Lohse, Martin Russ, Celina Wolters, Philipp A. Pickerodt, Roland C.E. Francis, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter


  • Open Access

    Evaluation of electric phrenic nerve stimulation patterns for mechanical ventilation: a pilot study

    by Arnhold Lohse, Philip von Platen, Carl-Friedrich Benner, Matthias Manfred Deininger, Teresa Gertrud Seemann, Dmitrij Ziles, Thomas Breuer, Steffen Leonhardt, Marian Walter

    Diaphragm atrophy is a common side effect of mechanical ventilation and results in prolonged weaning. Electric phrenic nerve stimulation presents a possibility to avoid diaphragm atrophy by keeping the diaphragm conditioned in sedated patients. There is a need of further investigation on how to set stimulation parameters to achieve sufficient ventilation. A prototype system is presented with a systematic evaluation for stimulation pattern adjustments. The main indicator for efficient stimulation was the tidal volume. The evaluation was performed in two pig models. As a major finding, the results for biphasic pulses were more consistent than for alternating pulses. The tidal volume increased for a range of pulse frequency and pulse width until reaching a plateau at 80–120 Hz and 0.15 ms. Furthermore, the generated tidal volume and the stimulation pulse frequency were significantly correlated (0.42–0.84, $$p<0.001$$ p < 0.001 ). The results show which stimulation parameter combinations generate the highest tidal volume. We established a guideline on how to set stimulation parameters. The guideline is helpful for future clinical applications of phrenic nerve stimulation.