Chung-Ching Lin

Background/Objectives: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) is a prevalent surgical procedure for treating obstructive sleep apnea. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient comfort and recovery. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacies of parecoxib and ketorolac in patients undergoing UPPP. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 83 patients who received either parecoxib (40 mg intravenously every 12 h) or ketorolac (30 mg intravenously every 8 h) for 2 days following UPPP. Postoperative pain and swallowing discomfort were assessed using visual analog scales (VASs) at 4, 24, 48, and 72 h. The time to resume eating and adverse reactions were also recorded. Results: At 24 and 48 h postoperatively, the mean VAS score was significantly higher in the ketorolac group compared to the parecoxib group (5.0 ± 2.3 vs. 3.6 ± 2.2, p = 0.005 and 3.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.001, respectively). However, no significant difference in the mean VAS scores was observed between the two groups at 72 h postoperatively. With regards to postoperative swallowing pain, the ketorolac group exhibited significantly higher mean VAS scores than the parecoxib group at 4, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Intravenous parecoxib may offer superior analgesic benefits in the early postoperative period, particularly in alleviating swallowing pain, compared to ketorolac in UPPP procedures.

Background: Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is a common disorder causing ear pressure, pain, and hearing loss. Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) is an emerging technique for dilating the Eustachian tube and treating ETD. Whether adding myringotomy improves BET efficacy is controversial. Methods: This retrospective study included 95 ETD patients undergoing BET alone (n = 44) or BET with myringotomy (BET + M; n = 51) between June 2020 and August 2021 at a single medical center. The primary outcome was the change in ETDQ-7 symptom scores from baseline to 6 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes included audiometry, endoscopy, Valsalva maneuver, and complications. Results: The ETDQ-7 scores improved significantly after treatment in both groups (p < 0.001), without significant between-group differences (p = 0.417). No significant differences occurred in the audiometry, endoscopy, and Valsalva results or in most complications between groups. One BET + M patient had a persistent tympanic membrane perforation. Conclusions: Both BET alone and BET + M effectively and safely improved the subjective and objective ETD outcomes. However, adding myringotomy did not further improve the outcomes over BET alone, while it incurred risks such as persistent perforation. BET alone may sufficiently treat ETD without requiring myringotomy in this cohort. Further randomized controlled trials should identify optimal candidates for BET alone versus combined approaches.