FAFrank Hendrik Ardesch

Frank Hendrik Ardesch

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Frank Hendrik Ardesch has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Diabetes in Secondary Care in The Netherlands: The Study Design of a Comprehensive Analysis of Claims and Demographic Data—DUDE (DUtch Diabetes Estimates)—10

    by Peter R. van Dijk, Marije van Zanten, Mireille A. Edens, Frank Ardesch, Arianne M. J. Elissen, Jan Westerink, Dirk Ruwaard, Henk J. G. Bilo

    Background: Obtaining reliable and detailed information about the population of individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) in The Netherlands remains a persistent challenge. Previous studies used primary care coding and extrapolations to estimate the countrywide population of individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this article, we present a design that aims to define and identify the population receiving treatment for DM in secondary care facilities in The Netherlands, encompassing both persons with T1DM and those with T2DM. Methods: We obtain information using reimbursement data accessible through the Vektis database, which contains information on 99.9% of the Dutch population, and combine these data with Statistics Netherlands data. The identification of subjects considered to have either T1DM or T2DM will be based on definitions derived from reimbursement details and the use of DM-associated medication (based on Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes) targeting both pediatric and adult populations over the years 2014–2024. Results: This combined approach will enable a more detailed characterization of the populations with DM treated in secondary care in The Netherlands using data on the total population. Ultimately, the data derived supports healthcare planning and policy making. Conclusions: This paper presents the design, search strategy and research questions related to this project.

  • Open Access

    Investigating socioeconomic disparities in prescribing new diabetes medications in individuals with type 2 diabetes and very high cardiovascular risk in the Netherlands

    by Frank H. Ardesch, Rose J. Geurten, Jeroen N. Struijs, Dirk Ruwaard, Henk J.G. Bilo, Arianne M.J. Elissen


  • Open Access

    Investigating socioeconomic disparities in prescribing new diabetes medication

    by F H Ardesch, R J Geurten, J N Struijs, D Ruwaard, Hjg Bilo, Amj Elissen

    Background: There is a concern regarding socioeconomic disparities in prescription of new medications such as SGLT-2is or GLP-1RAs in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aims to analyze prescription patterns of these medications and assess socioeconomic disparities in their initiation among individuals with T2DM with very high cardiovascular risk. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with T2DM and very high cardiovascular risk were identified (N = 10,768) based on general practitioner’ electronic health record data. Socioeconomic status (SES) was based on standardized disposable household income in quintiles. The association between SES and the prescription of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs in 2022 was investigated by logistic regression analyses, adjusting for potential confounding factors. SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs prescription patterns were examined over 2019-2022, stratified for age-groups and sex. Results: We found a positive association between SES quintile 1 (referent) and quintile 4 in SGLT-2is prescription in all models (OR 1.29 95%CI:1.08-1.54 in the fully adjusted model). For prescriptions of GLP-1RAs, we found no significant differences in SES. Proportionally, men are more frequently prescribed SGLT-2is, while there are no sex disparities in GLP-1RAs prescription. Older individuals consistently receive fewer SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs prescriptions compared to other age categories. Conclusions: We observed sex and age disparities but no profound socioeconomic differences in initiation of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs in the Netherlands. The latter may be due to guidelines’ clear indication of the eligible population (T2DM and very high cardiovascular risk) and GP education. Future development and potential disparities in initiation and maintenance should be monitored. Key messages: • We found no disparities in prescribing new Type 2 diabetes medication based on socioeconomic status. • The adoption of prescribing new medication for Type 2 diabetes patients takes time.

  • Open Access

    Intervention Characteristics and Mechanisms and Their Relationship with the Influence of Social Prescribing: A Systematic Review

    by Eveline M. Dubbeldeman, Jessica C. Kiefte-De Jong, Frank H. Ardesch, Mirte Boelens, Laura A. van der Velde, Sophie G. L. van der Steen, Miriam L. Heijnders, Mathilde R. Crone

    Introduction. Social prescribing (SP) is an integrated care program aimed to improve individuals’ health and wellbeing. Understanding the influence of SP and determining best practices and processes are challenging due to variability in its delivery, implementation, and intervention characteristics between different studies and countries. This study aimed to identify the intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and outcomes associated with SP research and explore how these factors relate to the influence of SP on health and wellbeing, healthcare utilization, and care experiences. Method. A comprehensive search was conducted in twelve databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant studies published from January 2010 up to April 2023. Searches were limited to literature written in English or Dutch. We utilized ASReview, an open‐source machine learning tool, to conduct title and abstract screening. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 and the ROBINS‐I. We coded all intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and relevant outcomes. Quantitative data were visually presented using Harvest Plots, and qualitative data were narratively summarized. Results and Discussion. In total, 49 papers were included, of which seven qualitative, seventeen quantitative, and 25 mixed method studies. The findings highlight the importance of social‐related mechanisms, including loneliness and social connectedness, in contributing to the observed positive influence of SP on mental health and wellbeing. The observed outcomes seem to be influenced by various characteristics, including gender, age, the presence of a link worker, and the use of behavior change techniques. However, we should be cautious when interpreting these results due to limitations in study designs, such as the lack of controlled trials and statistical considerations. Further rigorous research is needed to comprehensively understand the impact and potential benefits of SP.


  • Open Access

    Problematic Social Media Use and Lifestyle Behaviors in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

    by Frank Hendrik Ardesch, Denise Dorothy van der Vegt, Jessica Christina Kiefte-De Jong

    Background: The use of social media by adolescents has increased considerably in the past decade. With this increase in social media use in our daily lives, there has been a rapidly expanding awareness of the potential unhealthy lifestyle-related health effects arising from excessive, maladaptive, or addictive social media use. Objective: This study aims to assess the association between adolescents’ social media use and health-related behaviors. Methods: We used a cross-sectional research approach and analyzed data from 96,919 adolescents at high schools throughout the Netherlands. A structured 43-item questionnaire was used to gather data on sociodemographics, dietary and lifestyle factors, and the degree of social media use based on the Compulsive Internet Use Scale. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between problematic social media use (PSMU) and lifestyle behaviors while adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Results: Of the 96,919 included adolescents, 7.4% (n=7022) were identified as at risk for PSMU. Furthermore, logistic regression results showed that adolescents who are at risk for PSMU were more likely to report alcohol consumption and smoking while simultaneously having significantly lower levels of health-promoting behavior such as healthy eating habits (eating fruits, vegetables, and breakfast regularly) and physical activity. Conclusions: This study confirms that adolescents at risk of PSMU were more likely to exhibit an unhealthy lifestyle. Being at risk for PSMU was a determinant of soft drug use, alcohol consumption, smoking, poor eating habits, and lower physical activity independent of the additional adjusted covariates including demographic variables and remaining lifestyle variables. Future research is needed to confirm this observation in an experimental setting.


  • Open Access

    Intervention Characteristics and Mechanisms and their Relationship with the Influence of Social Prescribing: a Systematic Review

    by Eveline M. Dubbeldeman, Jessica C. Kiefte-De Jong, Frank H. Ardesch, Mirte Boelens, Laura A. van der Velde, Sophie G. L. van der Steen, Miriam L. Heijnders, Mathilde R. Crone

    Introduction: Social Prescribing (SP) is an integrated care program aimed to improve individuals’ health and wellbeing. Understanding the influence of SP and determining best practices and processes is challenging due to variability in its delivery, implementation, and intervention characteristics between different studies and countries. This study aimed to identify the intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and outcomes associated with SP research, and explore how these factors relate to the influence of SP on health and wellbeing, healthcare utilization, and care experiences. Method: A comprehensive search was conducted in 12 databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant studies published from January 2010 up to April 2023. Searches were limited to literature written in English or Dutch. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 and the ROBINS-I. We coded all intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and relevant outcomes. Qualitative data were visually presented using Harvest Plots and qualitative data were narratively summarized. Results and discussion: In total, 49 papers were included, of which seven qualitative, seventeen quantitative, and 25 mixed method studies. Moreover, the findings highlights the importance of social-related mechanisms, including loneliness and social connectedness, in contributing to the observed positive influence of SP on mental health and wellbeing. The observed outcomes seem to be influenced by various characteristics, including gender, age, the presence of a link worker, and the use of behavior change techniques. However, we should be cautious when interpreting these results due to limitations in study designs, such as the lack of controlled trials and statistical considerations. Further rigorous research is needed to comprehensively understand the impact and potential benefits of SP.

  • Open Access

    The introduction of a data-driven population health management approach in the Netherlands since 2019: The Extramural LUMC Academic Network data infrastructure

    by F.H. Ardesch, M.C. Meulendijk, J.M. Kist, R.C. Vos, H.M.M. Vos, J.C. Kiefte-De Jong, M Spruit, M.A. Bruijnzeels, M.J. Bussemaker, M.E. Numans, et al.