Lisett Solano Narduche
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lisett Solano Narduche has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alessandro Bartolacci
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
4 shared publications - Luca Pagliardini
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
4 shared publications - Elisa Rabellotti
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
3 shared publications - Enrico Papaleo
Centro Natalità, Gynaecological-Obstetric Department, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
3 shared publications - Giulia D’ALessandro
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
3 shared publications - Sofia de Girolamo
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 3 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
- Vol. 43 (9) , 2925-2929
Shortened vitrification and warming improve survival and accelerate meiotic resumption in human germinal vesicle oocytes compared with standard protocols
- 3 August 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
- Vol. 43 (9) , 2925-2929
Shortened vitrification and warming improve survival and accelerate meiotic resumption in human germinal vesicle oocytes compared with standard protocols
- Open Access
Trophectoderm, Inner Cell Mass, and Expansion Status for Live Birth Prediction After Frozen Blastocyst Transfer: The Winner Is Trophectoderm
Despite advancements in technologies such as time-lapse microscopy and artificial intelligence, the gold standard for embryo selection still relies on standard morphological assessment. Several studies have investigated the correlation between blastocyst characteristics (expansion status, inner cell mass, and trophectoderm) and clinical outcomes, reaching contradictory results. In consideration of these ambiguities in the literature, we performed a retrospective study of 1546 untested first-vitrified–warmed single day 5/6 blastocyst transfers. The purpose of our study is to evaluate three scenarios: (i) independent association between each morphological characteristic (expansion status, inner cell mass, and trophectoderm) and live birth; (ii) comparison between blastocysts with inner cell mass grade A and trophectoderm grade B and blastocysts with inner cell mass grade B and trophectoderm grade A; and (iii) comparison between poor-quality day 5 and top-quality day 6 blastocysts. After adjusting for principal confounders, we report that trophectoderm is more predictive of live births than inner cell mass and expansion status. We observed a trend in favor of top-quality day 6 blastocysts over poor-quality day 5 blastocysts. Moreover, on the same day of development and expansion status, blastocyst BA should be preferable to blastocyst AB.
Open AccessTrophectoderm, Inner Cell Mass, and Expansion Status for Live Birth Prediction After Frozen Blastocyst Transfer: The Winner Is Trophectoderm
Despite advancements in technologies such as time-lapse microscopy and artificial intelligence, the gold standard for embryo selection still relies on standard morphological assessment. Several studies have investigated the correlation between blastocyst characteristics (expansion status, inner cell mass, and trophectoderm) and clinical outcomes, reaching contradictory results. In consideration of these ambiguities in the literature, we performed a retrospective study of 1546 untested first-vitrified–warmed single day 5/6 blastocyst transfers. The purpose of our study is to evaluate three scenarios: (i) independent association between each morphological characteristic (expansion status, inner cell mass, and trophectoderm) and live birth; (ii) comparison between blastocysts with inner cell mass grade A and trophectoderm grade B and blastocysts with inner cell mass grade B and trophectoderm grade A; and (iii) comparison between poor-quality day 5 and top-quality day 6 blastocysts. After adjusting for principal confounders, we report that trophectoderm is more predictive of live births than inner cell mass and expansion status. We observed a trend in favor of top-quality day 6 blastocysts over poor-quality day 5 blastocysts. Moreover, on the same day of development and expansion status, blastocyst BA should be preferable to blastocyst AB.
- Open Access
- 11 June 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 14 (6) , 624
To Assess or Not to Assess: Reconsidering Day 3 Embryo Quality in Planned Freeze-All Blastocyst Cycles
Day 3 embryo quality is a predictor of in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates in cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, the association between day 3 embryo quality and clinical outcomes in blastocyst transfer policy is largely unknown. This retrospective study included 1074 frozen–thawed single day 5/6 blastocyst transfers between January 2019 and December 2022. Three groups were assessed depending on whether the transferred blastocyst derived from a top-quality, good-quality, or poor-quality embryo at day 3. The analysis was conducted independently for each blastocyst quality group (top, good, and poor) using multivariable logistic regression. We applied a Factorial Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) to reduce the potential collinearity between the covariates used in the model. All the blastocysts included in this study were obtained from the first ICSI freeze-all cycles. The cleavage and blastocysts stages were assessed between 67 ± 0.5 (day 3), 115 ± 0.5 (day 5), and 139 ± 0.5 (day 6) hours post-insemination (hpi), respectively. After adjusting for the day of transfer (day 5 or day 6) and FAMD dimensions, no statistical differences in a β-HCG, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were observed among the same-quality blastocysts derived from different day 3 embryo quality groups (top = A, good = B, and poor = C). Our findings showed that a day 3 embryo quality assessment may be unnecessary in planned freeze-all blastocyst cycles.
- 11 June 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 14 (6) , 624
Open AccessTo Assess or Not to Assess: Reconsidering Day 3 Embryo Quality in Planned Freeze-All Blastocyst Cycles
Day 3 embryo quality is a predictor of in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates in cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, the association between day 3 embryo quality and clinical outcomes in blastocyst transfer policy is largely unknown. This retrospective study included 1074 frozen–thawed single day 5/6 blastocyst transfers between January 2019 and December 2022. Three groups were assessed depending on whether the transferred blastocyst derived from a top-quality, good-quality, or poor-quality embryo at day 3. The analysis was conducted independently for each blastocyst quality group (top, good, and poor) using multivariable logistic regression. We applied a Factorial Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) to reduce the potential collinearity between the covariates used in the model. All the blastocysts included in this study were obtained from the first ICSI freeze-all cycles. The cleavage and blastocysts stages were assessed between 67 ± 0.5 (day 3), 115 ± 0.5 (day 5), and 139 ± 0.5 (day 6) hours post-insemination (hpi), respectively. After adjusting for the day of transfer (day 5 or day 6) and FAMD dimensions, no statistical differences in a β-HCG, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were observed among the same-quality blastocysts derived from different day 3 embryo quality groups (top = A, good = B, and poor = C). Our findings showed that a day 3 embryo quality assessment may be unnecessary in planned freeze-all blastocyst cycles.
- Open Access
The Task Matters: A Comprehensive Review and Proposed Literature Score of the Effects of Chemical and Physical Parameters on Embryo Developmental Competence
To explore the effects of chemical and physical parameters on embryo developmental competence, we conducted a systematic search on PubMed for peer-reviewed original papers using specific keywords and medical subject heading terms. Studies of interest were selected from an initial cohort of 4141 potentially relevant records retrieved. The most relevant publications were critically evaluated to identify the effect of these parameters on embryo development. Moreover, we generated a literature score (LS) using the following procedure: (i) the number of studies favoring a reference group was expressed as a fraction of all analyzed papers; (ii) the obtained fraction was multiplied by 10 and converted into a decimal number. We identified and discussed six parameters (oxygen, temperature, humidity, oil overlay, light, pH). Moreover, we generated a LS according to five different comparisons (37 °C vs. <37 °C; 5% vs. 20% oxygen; 5–2% vs. 5% oxygen; humidity conditions vs. dry conditions; light exposure vs. reduced/protected light exposure). Only two comparisons (37 °C vs. <37 °C and 5% vs. 20% oxygen) yielded a medium-high LS (8.3 and 7, respectively), suggesting a prevalence of studies in favor of the reference group (37 °C and 5% oxygen). In summary, this review and LS methodology offer semi-quantitative information on studies investigating the effects of chemical and physical parameters on embryo developmental competence.
Open AccessThe Task Matters: A Comprehensive Review and Proposed Literature Score of the Effects of Chemical and Physical Parameters on Embryo Developmental Competence
To explore the effects of chemical and physical parameters on embryo developmental competence, we conducted a systematic search on PubMed for peer-reviewed original papers using specific keywords and medical subject heading terms. Studies of interest were selected from an initial cohort of 4141 potentially relevant records retrieved. The most relevant publications were critically evaluated to identify the effect of these parameters on embryo development. Moreover, we generated a literature score (LS) using the following procedure: (i) the number of studies favoring a reference group was expressed as a fraction of all analyzed papers; (ii) the obtained fraction was multiplied by 10 and converted into a decimal number. We identified and discussed six parameters (oxygen, temperature, humidity, oil overlay, light, pH). Moreover, we generated a LS according to five different comparisons (37 °C vs. <37 °C; 5% vs. 20% oxygen; 5–2% vs. 5% oxygen; humidity conditions vs. dry conditions; light exposure vs. reduced/protected light exposure). Only two comparisons (37 °C vs. <37 °C and 5% vs. 20% oxygen) yielded a medium-high LS (8.3 and 7, respectively), suggesting a prevalence of studies in favor of the reference group (37 °C and 5% oxygen). In summary, this review and LS methodology offer semi-quantitative information on studies investigating the effects of chemical and physical parameters on embryo developmental competence.