Jacob B. Daniels

Background: Current methods of postural control assessments and interventions to improve postural stability and thereby prevent falls often fail to incorporate the hazardous perturbation situations that frequently accompany falls. Virtual environments can safely incorporate these hazards. The purpose of the study was to identify if virtual slip and trip perturbations can be used as an exposure paradigm in place of real slip and trip perturbations to improve postural control. Methods: Fifteen healthy young adults were included in this study. Two paradigms, real gait exposure (real) and virtual environment gait exposure (virtual), consisting of real and virtual slip and trip trials, were performed by each participant in a counterbalanced order to avoid order effects. At baseline and following real and virtual paradigms, the modified clinical test for sensory integration and balance (mCTSIB), limits of stability (LOS), and single-leg stance (SLS) using BTracks balance plate were administered. Separate one-way (baseline vs. Real vs. Virtual) repeated measures analysis of variance were conducted on response variables. Results: In the posterior left quadrant of the LOS, significant differences were found after the real paradigm compared to baseline (p = 0.04). For the anterior left quadrant and total LOS, significant differences post real paradigm (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001) and virtual paradigm (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001) compared to baseline were observed. For the SLS, the left-leg significant differences were observed post real paradigm (p = 0.019) and virtual paradigm (p = 0.009) compared to BL in path length, while significant main effects were found for mean sway velocity for the left leg only (p = 0.004). For the right leg, significant differences were only observed after the virtual paradigm (p = 0.01) compared to BL. Conclusions: Both virtual and real paradigms were identified to improve postural control. The virtual paradigm led to increased postural control in the right-leg SLS condition, while the real paradigm did not, without any adverse effects. Findings suggest virtual reality perturbation exposure acutely improves postural control ability compared to baseline among healthy young adults.

Evidence supports the role of palmar cooling to improve exercise performance, especially with endurance and resistance activities. The aim of this randomized placebo-controlled trial was to explore the effects of palmar cooling on repeated sprinting performance and recovery. Fifteen graduate students were randomly assigned to either a palmar cooling intervention or placebo group (males: n = 8, females: n = 7; Avg. age: 24.06 yrs.) After a ten-minute warm-up, participants completed ten sixty-meter sprints that included two 180-degree changes of direction. Three bouts of two-minute intervention or placebo occurred during the study. Data for sprint times, heart rate, and RPE were collected throughout testing. A muscle soreness rating was collected via survey 48 h post intervention. Statistically and practically significant differences were found between groups for average sprint times, heart rate, and delayed onset muscle soreness. The intervention group utilizing palmar cooling demonstrated less degradation in sprint times, lower heart rate upon completion, and a lower soreness rate 48 h after testing. More research is needed with a larger sample size to determine if practical and statistically significant differences will be maintained and would allow for a more robust multivariant analysis, resulting in the findings being more generalizable to a larger population.

Single-limb balance training is integral to preventing and rehabilitating lower extremity injuries. Previous investigations have shown that when using instability devices, differences may or may not exist in the postural sway parameters during use, depending on the specific devices being assessed. Thus, this investigation sought to examine the differences between a commonly used foam pad and a novel instability device (block) in postural sway measures. Twenty-two healthy individuals with no history of lower extremity injury or neurological disorders participated in this investigation. The participants performed three single-limb static balance exercises on a force platform sampling at 120 Hz. Each condition contained three 10-s trials separated by thirty seconds. The mean CoP values of the three trials in each condition were then compared using a within-subjects repeated-measures analysis of variance. Statistically significant differences were seen in the sway area between conditions (p = 0.009), the CoP path length (p = 0.007), the peak medial–lateral CoP displacement (p = 0.004), and the average sway velocity (p = 0.007). All variables displayed similar trends whereby the control condition showed significantly lower values than both instability devices, with no differences between devices. This investigation provides supporting evidence that different instability devices may deliver similar changes to postural sway parameters compared to control conditions. The novel block instability device used in this investigation may be used similarly to the traditional foam pad in prevention and rehabilitation settings based on the absence of differences between the two devices.

The COVID-19 pandemic had an immense effect on the well-being of healthcare professionals. In this study, researchers utilized a quantitative cross-sectional study design to investigate the degree of compassion satisfaction and fatigue amongst respiratory therapists in the state of Mississippi as a result of providing care to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantitative data were collected using an anonymous online survey that assessed the well-being and satisfaction of licensed respiratory therapists in the state of Mississippi. More specially, survey responses (n = 326) were quantitatively evaluated to measure the association between demographic variables and compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO), and secondary traumatic stress (STS). Ninety-seven percent of participants reported a medium to high CS level, while 74% indicated having a medium to high level of BO, and 69% reported a medium to high level of STS. Neither age nor gender had a significant difference in CS (p = 0.504; p = 0.405), BO (p = 0.161; p = 0.285), or STS (p = 0.145; p = 0.252). Those working for more than 10 years at their current employer had higher CS (M = 38.7) and lower BO (M = 24.9) and STS (M = 24.8) scores. The number of hours worked, specifically overtime, had a significant impact on BO (β = 0.09, p = 0.028) and STS (β = 0.0.11, p = 0.019), but not CS (β = 0.02, p = 0.655). These findings suggest that the number of years employed in the field impacts the level of compassion satisfaction and contributes to lower levels of burnout and secondary traumatic stress. The age of a patient may also affect levels of compassion and burnout. The results of this study highlight the importance of developing incentive plans in an effort to retain employees.