Marco Fusar Poli
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Marco Fusar Poli has a total of 28 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Francesco Ghielmetti
Health Department Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
2 shared publications - Grazia Devigili
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
2 shared publications - Marina Grisoli
Neuroradiology Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
2 shared publications - Nico Golfrè Andreasi
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
2 shared publications - Paolo Amami
Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy
2 shared publications - Roberto Cilia
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 19 April 2024
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 95 (10) , 988-990
Pain related to MRgFUS: a merely minor transient adverse event?
This study aimed to evaluate the intensity of head pain associated with sonication. In particular, we were interested in identifying predictive factors of high-intensity head pain as it could be a source of interference with the procedure. Furthermore, we explored eventual dissociative or post-traumatic consequences related to high-intensity pain during MRgFUS.
- 19 April 2024
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 95 (10) , 988-990
Pain related to MRgFUS: a merely minor transient adverse event?
This study aimed to evaluate the intensity of head pain associated with sonication. In particular, we were interested in identifying predictive factors of high-intensity head pain as it could be a source of interference with the procedure. Furthermore, we explored eventual dissociative or post-traumatic consequences related to high-intensity pain during MRgFUS.
- Open Access
- 10 November 2023
- Published by Wiley in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
- Vol. 11 (1) , 69-75
The Optimal Targeting for Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Differs between Dystonic and Essential Tremor: A 12‐Month Prospective Pilot Study
Background: Magnetic resonance‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is increasingly used to treat drug‐resistant essential tremor (ET). Data on MRgFUS thalamotomy in dystonic tremor (DT) are anecdotal.Objectives: To investigate efficacy, safety, and differences in target coordinates of MRgFUS thalamotomy in DT versus ET.Methods: Ten patients with DT and 35 with ET who consecutively underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy were followed for 12 months. Although in both groups the initial surgical planning coordinates corresponded to the ventralis intermediate (Vim), the final target could be modified intraoperatively based on clinical response.Results: Tremor significantly improved in both groups. The thalamic lesion was significantly more anterior in DT than ET. Considering both ET and DT groups, the more anterior the lesion, the lower the odds ratio for adverse events.Conclusions: MRgFUS thalamotomy is safe and effective in DT and ET. Compared to classical Vim coordinates used for ET, more anterior targeting should be considered for DT.
- 10 November 2023
- Published by Wiley in Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
- Vol. 11 (1) , 69-75
Open AccessThe Optimal Targeting for Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy Differs between Dystonic and Essential Tremor: A 12‐Month Prospective Pilot Study
Background: Magnetic resonance‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is increasingly used to treat drug‐resistant essential tremor (ET). Data on MRgFUS thalamotomy in dystonic tremor (DT) are anecdotal.Objectives: To investigate efficacy, safety, and differences in target coordinates of MRgFUS thalamotomy in DT versus ET.Methods: Ten patients with DT and 35 with ET who consecutively underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy were followed for 12 months. Although in both groups the initial surgical planning coordinates corresponded to the ventralis intermediate (Vim), the final target could be modified intraoperatively based on clinical response.Results: Tremor significantly improved in both groups. The thalamic lesion was significantly more anterior in DT than ET. Considering both ET and DT groups, the more anterior the lesion, the lower the odds ratio for adverse events.Conclusions: MRgFUS thalamotomy is safe and effective in DT and ET. Compared to classical Vim coordinates used for ET, more anterior targeting should be considered for DT.