Xinhao Wang

Xinhao Wang

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Xinhao Wang has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Fengjiang Qin

    Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

    3 shared publications
  • Qiuwei Yang

    Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Operation & Maintenance for Deep-Sea Foundations, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China

    3 shared publications
  • Xi Peng

    Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Operation & Maintenance for Deep-Sea Foundations, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China

    2 shared publications
  • Hongfei Cao

    Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Operation & Maintenance for Deep-Sea Foundations, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Mixed-Curve Model for Evaluating the Carbonation Depth of Concrete at Different Ages

    by Xinhao Wang, Qiuwei Yang, Hongfei Cao, Fengjiang Qin

    To accurately quantify the variation in concrete carbonation depth, selecting an appropriate mathematical curve model is crucial. Currently prevalent models, such as the Fick model and exponential models, confront limitations in prediction accuracy and range of application. Given that a single curve model struggles to precisely describe the pattern of concrete carbonation, this work introduces a mixed-curve-based prediction model for carbonation depth, effectively integrating the Fick model with a hyperbolic model. Compared to the Fick model, the additional term in the mixed-curve model can be viewed as a reasonable correction to better adapt to the complex and varied conditions of concrete carbonation. This hybrid model transcends the limitations of individual models, enhancing fitting precision and broadening the scope of applicability. The new model boasts a concise structure with only two fitting parameters, facilitating ease of application. To validate its superiority, rigorous comparisons were conducted between the proposed model and existing ones, leveraging experimental data from 10 distinct concrete carbonation scenarios. By comparing the average error, standard deviation, and coefficient of determination across these cases, the new model demonstrates a clear advantage over the Fick model and the exponential model. In terms of fitting errors, the average error and standard deviation of the new model are notably lower than those of the other two models. In terms of the coefficient of determination, the values achieved by the new model in all examples are closer to 1 than those of both the Fick model and the exponential model, underscoring the new model’s superior fitting quality and remarkable stability. This research indicates that the combined model presented in this paper holds promising prospects for widespread application in predicting concrete carbonation depth.


  • Open Access

    A Review of Concrete Carbonation Depth Evaluation Models

    by Xinhao Wang, Qiuwei Yang, Xi Peng, Fengjiang Qin

    Carbonation is one of the critical issues affecting the durability of reinforced concrete. Evaluating the depth of concrete carbonation is of great significance for ensuring the quality and safety of construction projects. In recent years, various prediction algorithms have been developed for evaluating concrete carbonation depth. This article provides a detailed overview of the existing prediction models for concrete carbonation depth. According to the data processing methods used in the model, the existing prediction models can be divided into mathematical curve models and machine learning models. The machine learning models can be further divided into the following categories: artificial neural network model, decision tree model, support vector machine model, and combined models. The basic idea of the mathematical curve model is to directly establish the relationship between the carbonation depth and age of concrete by using certain function curves. The advantage of the mathematical curve model is that only a small amount of experimental data is needed for curve fitting, which is very convenient for engineering applications. The limitation of the curve model is that it can only consider the influence of some factors on the carbonation depth of concrete, and the prediction accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The advantage of using the machine learning model to predict the carbonation depth of concrete is that many factors can be considered at the same time. When there are sufficient experimental data, the trained machine learning model can give more accurate prediction results than the mathematical curve model. The main defect of the machine learning model is that it needs a lot of experimental data as training samples, so it is not as convenient as the mathematical curve model in engineering applications. A future research direction may be to combine a machine learning model with a mathematical curve model to evaluate the carbonation depth of concrete more accurately.


  • Open Access

    General Curve Model for Evaluating Mechanical Properties of Concrete at Different Ages

    by Qiuwei Yang, Xinhao Wang, Xi Peng, Fengjiang Qin

    During the process of pouring and solidification of concrete, the compressive strength and elastic modulus of concrete exhibit dynamic growth patterns. The mechanical properties of concrete usually remain stable in the later stage (28 days after pouring). Studying appropriate curve models to accurately evaluate the changes in early mechanical properties of concrete has always been an important topic in the field of concrete materials. This work proposes a new dual parameter curve model for accurately evaluating the growth pattern of early compressive strength and elastic modulus of concrete. A comparative study was conducted between the proposed new curve model and existing curve models using 18 sets of experimental data from 10 literature sources. The research results indicate that the fitting average error and standard deviation of this new curve model are significantly smaller than the existing curve models. For some examples, the fitting error and standard deviation of the new model are only about 20%–30% of those of the existing models. The main advantages of this new curve model lie in two aspects. The first advantage is that this new curve model only contains two unknown parameters, so only a small amount of experimental data is required for data fitting and does not require complex mathematical operations. The second advantage is that this new curve model has a wide range of applications, which include compressive strength evaluation and elastic modulus evaluation and can also be extended to the evaluation of the mechanical properties of other materials similar to concrete.