Jin Yang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jin Yang has a total of 78 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aristeidis Sotiras
University of Pennsylvania
5 shared publications Daniel S. Marcus
2 shared publicationsXiaobing Yu
2 shared publicationsAnika Sierk
University Medical Centre Charite, Berlin, Germany
1 shared publication- Anna R. Hudson
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
1 shared publication - Anthony Pj King
The Ohio State University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 29 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Pattern Recognition
- Vol. 183
Adapting medical vision foundation models for volumetric medical image segmentation via active learning and selective semi-supervised fine-tuning
- 29 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Pattern Recognition
- Vol. 183
Open AccessAdapting medical vision foundation models for volumetric medical image segmentation via active learning and selective semi-supervised fine-tuning
- Open Access
- 29 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
How does Active Learning Tackle Domain Adaptation: A Survey on Active Domain Adaptation and Active Continual Learning
Machine learning and deep learning models trained on a source domain often suffer from performance degradation when deployed to new target domains due to domain shifts arising from differences in data distributions, acquisition conditions, or temporal variations. Domain adaptation addresses this issue by transferring knowledge from labeled source data to unlabeled target data. However, acquiring labels for target-domain samples is often costly or impractical in real-world applications. To improve label efficiency, active domain adaptation (ADA) and active continual learning (ACL) integrate active learning strategies into domain adaptation and continual learning frameworks. ADA selectively queries informative target samples to enhance adaptation performance, while ACL extends this paradigm to sequential settings, enabling models to adapt to evolving data streams while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. This survey provides a systematic review of ADA and ACL, focusing on their advances and applications. We further examine extensions of ADA such as source-free ADA, integration with semi-supervised learning, and advanced techniques for handling challenging adaptation scenarios. In addition, we summarize applications across computer vision, medical imaging, robotics, natural language processing, scientific and engineering tasks. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including robust adaptation under complex distribution shifts and reliable semisupervised adaptation.
- 29 July 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Open AccessHow does Active Learning Tackle Domain Adaptation: A Survey on Active Domain Adaptation and Active Continual Learning
Machine learning and deep learning models trained on a source domain often suffer from performance degradation when deployed to new target domains due to domain shifts arising from differences in data distributions, acquisition conditions, or temporal variations. Domain adaptation addresses this issue by transferring knowledge from labeled source data to unlabeled target data. However, acquiring labels for target-domain samples is often costly or impractical in real-world applications. To improve label efficiency, active domain adaptation (ADA) and active continual learning (ACL) integrate active learning strategies into domain adaptation and continual learning frameworks. ADA selectively queries informative target samples to enhance adaptation performance, while ACL extends this paradigm to sequential settings, enabling models to adapt to evolving data streams while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. This survey provides a systematic review of ADA and ACL, focusing on their advances and applications. We further examine extensions of ADA such as source-free ADA, integration with semi-supervised learning, and advanced techniques for handling challenging adaptation scenarios. In addition, we summarize applications across computer vision, medical imaging, robotics, natural language processing, scientific and engineering tasks. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including robust adaptation under complex distribution shifts and reliable semisupervised adaptation.
- Open Access
- 4 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
How does Active Learning Tackle Domain Adaptation: A Survey on Active Domain Adaptation and Active Continual Learning
Machine learning and deep learning models trained on a source domain often suffer from performance degradation when deployed to new target domains due to domain shifts arising from differences in data distributions, acquisition conditions, or temporal variations. Domain adaptation addresses this issue by transferring knowledge from labeled source data to unlabeled target data. However, acquiring labels for target-domain samples is often costly or impractical in real-world applications. To improve label efficiency, active domain adaptation (ADA) and active continual learning (ACL) integrate active learning strategies into domain adaptation and continual learning frameworks. ADA selectively queries informative target samples to enhance adaptation performance, while ACL extends this paradigm to sequential settings, enabling models to adapt to evolving data streams while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. This survey provides a systematic review of ADA and ACL, focusing on their advances and applications. We further examine extensions of ADA such as source-free ADA, integration with semi-supervised learning, and advanced techniques for handling challenging adaptation scenarios. In addition, we summarize applications across computer vision, medical imaging, robotics, natural language processing, scientific and engineering tasks. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including robust adaptation under complex distribution shifts and reliable semi-supervised adaptation.
- 4 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessHow does Active Learning Tackle Domain Adaptation: A Survey on Active Domain Adaptation and Active Continual Learning
Machine learning and deep learning models trained on a source domain often suffer from performance degradation when deployed to new target domains due to domain shifts arising from differences in data distributions, acquisition conditions, or temporal variations. Domain adaptation addresses this issue by transferring knowledge from labeled source data to unlabeled target data. However, acquiring labels for target-domain samples is often costly or impractical in real-world applications. To improve label efficiency, active domain adaptation (ADA) and active continual learning (ACL) integrate active learning strategies into domain adaptation and continual learning frameworks. ADA selectively queries informative target samples to enhance adaptation performance, while ACL extends this paradigm to sequential settings, enabling models to adapt to evolving data streams while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. This survey provides a systematic review of ADA and ACL, focusing on their advances and applications. We further examine extensions of ADA such as source-free ADA, integration with semi-supervised learning, and advanced techniques for handling challenging adaptation scenarios. In addition, we summarize applications across computer vision, medical imaging, robotics, natural language processing, scientific and engineering tasks. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future directions, including robust adaptation under complex distribution shifts and reliable semi-supervised adaptation.
- 1 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Neurocomputing
- Vol. 683
Active multi-modality learning for medical image segmentation via disentangling modalities and evaluating anatomical distribution
- 1 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Neurocomputing
- Vol. 683
Active multi-modality learning for medical image segmentation via disentangling modalities and evaluating anatomical distribution
- Open Access
- 10 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- Vol. 112
AgileFormer: Spatially agile and scalable transformer for medical image segmentation
- 10 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- Vol. 112
Open AccessAgileFormer: Spatially agile and scalable transformer for medical image segmentation
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 10 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- Vol. 113
D-Net: Dynamic large kernel with dynamic feature fusion for volumetric medical image segmentation
- 10 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- Vol. 113
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessD-Net: Dynamic large kernel with dynamic feature fusion for volumetric medical image segmentation
- Open Access
- 13 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- Vol. 109
DMC-Net: Lightweight Dynamic Multi-scale and Multi-resolution convolution network for pancreas segmentation in CT images
- 13 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
- Vol. 109
Open AccessDMC-Net: Lightweight Dynamic Multi-scale and Multi-resolution convolution network for pancreas segmentation in CT images
- Open Access
- 28 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Neuropsychopharmacology
- Vol. 49 (3) , 609-619
Examining the association between posttraumatic stress disorder and disruptions in cortical networks identified using data-driven methods
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with lower cortical thickness (CT) in prefrontal, cingulate, and insular cortices in diverse trauma-affected samples. However, some studies have failed to detect differences between PTSD patients and healthy controls or reported that PTSD is associated with greater CT. Using data-driven dimensionality reduction, we sought to conduct a well-powered study to identify vulnerable networks without regard to neuroanatomic boundaries. Moreover, this approach enabled us to avoid the excessive burden of multiple comparison correction that plagues vertex-wise methods. We derived structural covariance networks (SCNs) by applying non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to CT data from 961 PTSD patients and 1124 trauma-exposed controls without PTSD. We used regression analyses to investigate associations between CT within SCNs and PTSD diagnosis (with and without accounting for the potential confounding effect of trauma type) and symptom severity in the full sample. We performed additional regression analyses in subsets of the data to examine associations between SCNs and comorbid depression, childhood trauma severity, and alcohol abuse. NMF identified 20 unbiased SCNs, which aligned closely with functionally defined brain networks. PTSD diagnosis was most strongly associated with diminished CT in SCNs that encompassed the bilateral superior frontal cortex, motor cortex, insular cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, medial occipital cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex. CT in these networks was significantly negatively correlated with PTSD symptom severity. Collectively, these findings suggest that PTSD diagnosis is associated with widespread reductions in CT, particularly within prefrontal regulatory regions and broader emotion and sensory processing cortical regions.
- 28 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Neuropsychopharmacology
- Vol. 49 (3) , 609-619
Open AccessExamining the association between posttraumatic stress disorder and disruptions in cortical networks identified using data-driven methods
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with lower cortical thickness (CT) in prefrontal, cingulate, and insular cortices in diverse trauma-affected samples. However, some studies have failed to detect differences between PTSD patients and healthy controls or reported that PTSD is associated with greater CT. Using data-driven dimensionality reduction, we sought to conduct a well-powered study to identify vulnerable networks without regard to neuroanatomic boundaries. Moreover, this approach enabled us to avoid the excessive burden of multiple comparison correction that plagues vertex-wise methods. We derived structural covariance networks (SCNs) by applying non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) to CT data from 961 PTSD patients and 1124 trauma-exposed controls without PTSD. We used regression analyses to investigate associations between CT within SCNs and PTSD diagnosis (with and without accounting for the potential confounding effect of trauma type) and symptom severity in the full sample. We performed additional regression analyses in subsets of the data to examine associations between SCNs and comorbid depression, childhood trauma severity, and alcohol abuse. NMF identified 20 unbiased SCNs, which aligned closely with functionally defined brain networks. PTSD diagnosis was most strongly associated with diminished CT in SCNs that encompassed the bilateral superior frontal cortex, motor cortex, insular cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, medial occipital cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex. CT in these networks was significantly negatively correlated with PTSD symptom severity. Collectively, these findings suggest that PTSD diagnosis is associated with widespread reductions in CT, particularly within prefrontal regulatory regions and broader emotion and sensory processing cortical regions.