Ismay A. E. de Beijer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Ismay A. E. de Beijer has a total of 113 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Anne Uyttebroeck
Department of Oncology, Paediatric Oncology, KU Leuven, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
4 shared publicationsEdit Bardi
St Anna Children's Hospital Vienna Austria
4 shared publicationsHannah Gsell
Childhood Cancer International Europe Vienna Austria
4 shared publicationsLeontien C. M. Kremer
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Utrecht the Netherlands
4 shared publicationsMonica Muraca
DOPO clinic, Department of Hematology/Oncology IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini Genoa Italy
4 shared publicationsAdela Cañete Nieto
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 October 2026
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 15 (10)
Lifestyle Behaviors and Physical Health in Canadian Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
Background: With this study, we aimed to investigate the longitudinal relationships between lifestyle behaviors and physical health in childhood, adolescent, or young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors attending the Long‐Term Survivor's Clinic (LTSC) in Calgary, Canada. Methods: Survivors attended the LTSC once or twice a year and completed a questionnaire at each visit. Among survivors of any cancer diagnosis who were aged ≥ 11 years at the time of assessment, physical health was captured using two outcomes: the number of self‐reported physical health problems and the number of physical health‐related medications used. Self‐reported lifestyle behaviors, including physical activity, alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use, and sleep quality were scored as healthy (1) or unhealthy (0), and combined into a sum score ranging from 0 to 5. Multivariable, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were estimated to assess the association between lifestyle behaviors (sum score and individual behaviors) and physical health outcomes, irrespective of time. To address our second research question, cross‐lagged GLMMs, incorporating a time component, were estimated to assess directionality between lifestyle sum score and the number of physical health problems. Results: In total, 766 responses from 312 CAYA cancer survivors (median age at follow‐up 23.8 years; 49% male; 37% diagnosed with leukemia) were included. A healthier lifestyle sum score and sufficient physical activity were associated with fewer physical health problems (estimate −0.15, SE 0.06, p ‐value 0.02 and estimate −0.23, SE 0.11, p ‐value 0.04, respectively). No significant associations were found between lifestyle and the number of medications used. Lifestyle behaviors at an earlier time did not predict better physical health at a later time and vice versa. Conclusions: Findings confirm an association between a healthy lifestyle and fewer physical health problems. Additional studies are warranted to further elucidate directional pathways between a survivor's lifestyle and physical health.
- 6 October 2026
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 15 (10)
Open AccessLifestyle Behaviors and Physical Health in Canadian Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
Background: With this study, we aimed to investigate the longitudinal relationships between lifestyle behaviors and physical health in childhood, adolescent, or young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors attending the Long‐Term Survivor's Clinic (LTSC) in Calgary, Canada. Methods: Survivors attended the LTSC once or twice a year and completed a questionnaire at each visit. Among survivors of any cancer diagnosis who were aged ≥ 11 years at the time of assessment, physical health was captured using two outcomes: the number of self‐reported physical health problems and the number of physical health‐related medications used. Self‐reported lifestyle behaviors, including physical activity, alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use, and sleep quality were scored as healthy (1) or unhealthy (0), and combined into a sum score ranging from 0 to 5. Multivariable, generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were estimated to assess the association between lifestyle behaviors (sum score and individual behaviors) and physical health outcomes, irrespective of time. To address our second research question, cross‐lagged GLMMs, incorporating a time component, were estimated to assess directionality between lifestyle sum score and the number of physical health problems. Results: In total, 766 responses from 312 CAYA cancer survivors (median age at follow‐up 23.8 years; 49% male; 37% diagnosed with leukemia) were included. A healthier lifestyle sum score and sufficient physical activity were associated with fewer physical health problems (estimate −0.15, SE 0.06, p ‐value 0.02 and estimate −0.23, SE 0.11, p ‐value 0.04, respectively). No significant associations were found between lifestyle and the number of medications used. Lifestyle behaviors at an earlier time did not predict better physical health at a later time and vice versa. Conclusions: Findings confirm an association between a healthy lifestyle and fewer physical health problems. Additional studies are warranted to further elucidate directional pathways between a survivor's lifestyle and physical health.
- Open Access
- 11 September 2026
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 15 (9)
Health Behaviors in Adolescent and Young Adult ( AYA ) Childhood Cancer Survivors: Prevalence, Determinants, and Comparison With Population Controls
Introduction: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at lifelong risk for late adverse health outcomes. Healthy behaviors, including physical activity, substance avoidance, adequate sleep, and sun protection, are critical to mitigating these risks. Yet, data on their prevalence and determinants in this population remain limited. This study aims to describe health behaviors among adolescent and young adult (AYA) CCS in Alberta, Canada, compare them with population‐based controls, and identify associated factors for suboptimal health behaviors. Methods: This is a longitudinal cohort study of 312 CCS aged ≥ 11 years enrolled in the Long‐Term Survivor Clinic at the Alberta Children's Hospital between July 2021 and July 2025. Self‐reported questionnaires captured health behavior outcomes and covariates. Comparisons were made with Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) controls. Risk factors were determined using Bayesian analyses. Results: Among 312 participants (median age 22.1 years [interquartile range 8.78]; 50.6% female) at baseline, 31% did not meet physical activity recommendations, 13% reported current tobacco use, 29% reported current cannabis use, 0.1% reported poor sleep quality, and 47% reported only sometimes or rarely using sunscreen, with 14% never using sunscreen. Only 5.8% reported ever using artificial tanning devices. Compared with controls, CCS had higher rates of insufficient physical activity and e‐cigarette use but lower rates of alcohol and medicinal cannabis use. Older age predicted artificial tanning, while male sex was associated with tobacco use and lower sunscreen adherence. Treatment intensity was not associated with any of the health behaviors. Conclusion: In this study, age and sex rather than treatment intensity predicted health behaviors. Emerging behaviors, such as e‐cigarette and medicinal cannabis use, highlight gaps in current survivorship care and the need for standardized counseling frameworks. Overall, the integration of routine health behavior assessments and targeted interventions addressing these behaviors and associated factors is warranted to optimize long‐term AYA survivorship outcomes.
- 11 September 2026
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 15 (9)
Open AccessHealth Behaviors in Adolescent and Young Adult ( AYA ) Childhood Cancer Survivors: Prevalence, Determinants, and Comparison With Population Controls
Introduction: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at lifelong risk for late adverse health outcomes. Healthy behaviors, including physical activity, substance avoidance, adequate sleep, and sun protection, are critical to mitigating these risks. Yet, data on their prevalence and determinants in this population remain limited. This study aims to describe health behaviors among adolescent and young adult (AYA) CCS in Alberta, Canada, compare them with population‐based controls, and identify associated factors for suboptimal health behaviors. Methods: This is a longitudinal cohort study of 312 CCS aged ≥ 11 years enrolled in the Long‐Term Survivor Clinic at the Alberta Children's Hospital between July 2021 and July 2025. Self‐reported questionnaires captured health behavior outcomes and covariates. Comparisons were made with Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) controls. Risk factors were determined using Bayesian analyses. Results: Among 312 participants (median age 22.1 years [interquartile range 8.78]; 50.6% female) at baseline, 31% did not meet physical activity recommendations, 13% reported current tobacco use, 29% reported current cannabis use, 0.1% reported poor sleep quality, and 47% reported only sometimes or rarely using sunscreen, with 14% never using sunscreen. Only 5.8% reported ever using artificial tanning devices. Compared with controls, CCS had higher rates of insufficient physical activity and e‐cigarette use but lower rates of alcohol and medicinal cannabis use. Older age predicted artificial tanning, while male sex was associated with tobacco use and lower sunscreen adherence. Treatment intensity was not associated with any of the health behaviors. Conclusion: In this study, age and sex rather than treatment intensity predicted health behaviors. Emerging behaviors, such as e‐cigarette and medicinal cannabis use, highlight gaps in current survivorship care and the need for standardized counseling frameworks. Overall, the integration of routine health behavior assessments and targeted interventions addressing these behaviors and associated factors is warranted to optimize long‐term AYA survivorship outcomes.
- Open Access
- 22 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in EJC Paediatric Oncology
- Vol. 6
Transition needs and preferences identified during peer visits to three European best-practice CAYA cancer Long-Term Follow-Up care centres: An EU-CAYAS-NET project
- 22 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in EJC Paediatric Oncology
- Vol. 6
Open AccessTransition needs and preferences identified during peer visits to three European best-practice CAYA cancer Long-Term Follow-Up care centres: An EU-CAYAS-NET project
- Open Access
- 21 June 2024
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 13 (12) , e7361
Barriers, facilitators, and other factors associated with health behaviors in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
Background: Healthy behaviors are paramount in preventing long‐term adverse health outcomes in childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors. We systematically reviewed and synthesized existing literature on barriers, facilitators, and other factors associated with health behaviors in this population. Methods: MEDLINE and PsycInfo were searched for qualitative and quantitative studies including survivors aged 16–50 years at study, a cancer diagnosis ≤25 years and ≥2 years post diagnosis. Health behaviors included physical activity, smoking, diet, alcohol consumption, sun exposure, and a combination of these behaviors (defined as health behaviors in general). Results: Barriers, facilitators, and other factors reported in ≥2 two studies were considered relevant. Out of 4529 studies, 27 were included ( n = 31,905 participants). Physical activity was the most frequently examined behavior ( n = 12 studies), followed by smoking ( n = 7), diet ( n = 7), alcohol ( n = 4), sun exposure ( n = 4), and health behavior in general ( n = 4). Relevant barriers to physical activity were fatigue, lack of motivation, time constraints, and current smoking. Relevant facilitators were perceived health benefits and motivation. Influence of the social environment and poor mental health were associated with more smoking, while increased energy was associated with less smoking. No relevant barriers and facilitators were identified for diet, alcohol consumption, and sun exposure. Barriers to healthy behavior in general were unmet information needs and time constraints whereas lifestyle advice, information, and discussions with a healthcare professional facilitated healthy behavior in general. Concerning other factors, women were more likely to be physically inactive, but less likely to drink alcohol and more likely to comply with sun protection recommendations than men. Higher education was associated with more physical activity, and lower education with more smoking. Conclusion: This knowledge can be used as a starting point to develop health behavior interventions, inform lifestyle coaches, and increase awareness among healthcare providers regarding which survivors are most at risk of unhealthy behaviors.
- 21 June 2024
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 13 (12) , e7361
Open AccessBarriers, facilitators, and other factors associated with health behaviors in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review
Background: Healthy behaviors are paramount in preventing long‐term adverse health outcomes in childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors. We systematically reviewed and synthesized existing literature on barriers, facilitators, and other factors associated with health behaviors in this population. Methods: MEDLINE and PsycInfo were searched for qualitative and quantitative studies including survivors aged 16–50 years at study, a cancer diagnosis ≤25 years and ≥2 years post diagnosis. Health behaviors included physical activity, smoking, diet, alcohol consumption, sun exposure, and a combination of these behaviors (defined as health behaviors in general). Results: Barriers, facilitators, and other factors reported in ≥2 two studies were considered relevant. Out of 4529 studies, 27 were included ( n = 31,905 participants). Physical activity was the most frequently examined behavior ( n = 12 studies), followed by smoking ( n = 7), diet ( n = 7), alcohol ( n = 4), sun exposure ( n = 4), and health behavior in general ( n = 4). Relevant barriers to physical activity were fatigue, lack of motivation, time constraints, and current smoking. Relevant facilitators were perceived health benefits and motivation. Influence of the social environment and poor mental health were associated with more smoking, while increased energy was associated with less smoking. No relevant barriers and facilitators were identified for diet, alcohol consumption, and sun exposure. Barriers to healthy behavior in general were unmet information needs and time constraints whereas lifestyle advice, information, and discussions with a healthcare professional facilitated healthy behavior in general. Concerning other factors, women were more likely to be physically inactive, but less likely to drink alcohol and more likely to comply with sun protection recommendations than men. Higher education was associated with more physical activity, and lower education with more smoking. Conclusion: This knowledge can be used as a starting point to develop health behavior interventions, inform lifestyle coaches, and increase awareness among healthcare providers regarding which survivors are most at risk of unhealthy behaviors.
- Open Access
- 2 May 2024
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Vol. 26 (1) , e49910
IT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey
Background: To overcome knowledge gaps and optimize long-term follow-up (LTFU) care for childhood cancer survivors, the concept of the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) has been invented. Within the European PanCareSurPass project, the semiautomated and interoperable SurPass (version 2.0) will be optimized, implemented, and evaluated at 6 LTFU care centers representing 6 European countries and 3 distinct health system scenarios: (1) national electronic health information systems (EHISs) in Austria and Lithuania, (2) regional or local EHISs in Italy and Spain, and (3) cancer registries or hospital-based EHISs in Belgium and Germany. Objective: We aimed to identify and describe barriers and facilitators for SurPass (version 2.0) implementation concerning semiautomation of data input, interoperability, data protection, privacy, and cybersecurity. Methods: IT specialists from the 6 LTFU care centers participated in a semistructured digital survey focusing on IT-related barriers and facilitators to SurPass (version 2.0) implementation. We used the fit-viability model to assess the compatibility and feasibility of integrating SurPass into existing EHISs. Results: In total, 13/20 (65%) invited IT specialists participated. The main barriers and facilitators in all 3 health system scenarios related to semiautomated data input and interoperability included unaligned EHIS infrastructure and the use of interoperability frameworks and international coding systems. The main barriers and facilitators related to data protection or privacy and cybersecurity included pseudonymization of personal health data and data retention. According to the fit-viability model, the first health system scenario provides the best fit for SurPass implementation, followed by the second and third scenarios. Conclusions: This study provides essential insights into the information and IT-related influencing factors that need to be considered when implementing the SurPass (version 2.0) in clinical practice. We recommend the adoption of Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and data security measures such as encryption, pseudonymization, and multifactor authentication to protect personal health data where applicable. In sum, this study offers practical insights into integrating digital health solutions into existing EHISs.
- 2 May 2024
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Vol. 26 (1) , e49910
Open AccessIT-Related Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of a New European eHealth Solution, the Digital Survivorship Passport (SurPass Version 2.0): Semistructured Digital Survey
Background: To overcome knowledge gaps and optimize long-term follow-up (LTFU) care for childhood cancer survivors, the concept of the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) has been invented. Within the European PanCareSurPass project, the semiautomated and interoperable SurPass (version 2.0) will be optimized, implemented, and evaluated at 6 LTFU care centers representing 6 European countries and 3 distinct health system scenarios: (1) national electronic health information systems (EHISs) in Austria and Lithuania, (2) regional or local EHISs in Italy and Spain, and (3) cancer registries or hospital-based EHISs in Belgium and Germany. Objective: We aimed to identify and describe barriers and facilitators for SurPass (version 2.0) implementation concerning semiautomation of data input, interoperability, data protection, privacy, and cybersecurity. Methods: IT specialists from the 6 LTFU care centers participated in a semistructured digital survey focusing on IT-related barriers and facilitators to SurPass (version 2.0) implementation. We used the fit-viability model to assess the compatibility and feasibility of integrating SurPass into existing EHISs. Results: In total, 13/20 (65%) invited IT specialists participated. The main barriers and facilitators in all 3 health system scenarios related to semiautomated data input and interoperability included unaligned EHIS infrastructure and the use of interoperability frameworks and international coding systems. The main barriers and facilitators related to data protection or privacy and cybersecurity included pseudonymization of personal health data and data retention. According to the fit-viability model, the first health system scenario provides the best fit for SurPass implementation, followed by the second and third scenarios. Conclusions: This study provides essential insights into the information and IT-related influencing factors that need to be considered when implementing the SurPass (version 2.0) in clinical practice. We recommend the adoption of Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and data security measures such as encryption, pseudonymization, and multifactor authentication to protect personal health data where applicable. In sum, this study offers practical insights into integrating digital health solutions into existing EHISs.
- Open Access
- 11 March 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 19 (3) , 1111
Correction: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a new European eHealth solution (SurPass v2.0): the PanCareSurPass Open Space study
- 11 March 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 19 (3) , 1111
Open AccessCorrection: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a new European eHealth solution (SurPass v2.0): the PanCareSurPass Open Space study
- Open Access
- 4 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 19 (2) , 603-613
European recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors from the end of treatment to 5 years after diagnosis: a PanCare guideline
Purpose: Childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors require ongoing surveillance for health problems from the end of cancer treatment throughout their lives. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines on optimal surveillance strategies for the period from the end of treatment to 5 years after diagnosis. We aimed to address this gap by developing recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems based on existing long-term follow-up (LTFU) care guidelines. Methods: The guideline working group, consisting of healthcare professionals, parents and survivor representatives from 10 countries, worked together to identify relevant health problems that may occur in survivors between the end of treatment and 5 years after diagnosis and to develop recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems. The recommendations were drawn from existing LTFU guidelines and adapted where necessary based on clinical expertise. Results: The working group developed 44 recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems, which were divided into four categories based on the level of surveillance required: awareness only (n = 11), awareness, history and/or physical examination without surveillance test (n = 15), awareness, history and/or physical examination with potential surveillance test (n = 1) and awareness, history and/or physical examination with surveillance test (n = 17). Conclusion: The development of a guideline for short-term surveillance of health problems fills a critical gap in survivorship care for CAYA cancer survivors, providing much-needed support immediately after treatment up to 5 years after diagnosis. Implications for Cancer Survivors. This guideline will support healthcare professionals to provide appropriate follow-up care and improve the quality of life of CAYA cancer survivors.
- 4 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 19 (2) , 603-613
Open AccessEuropean recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems in childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors from the end of treatment to 5 years after diagnosis: a PanCare guideline
Purpose: Childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors require ongoing surveillance for health problems from the end of cancer treatment throughout their lives. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines on optimal surveillance strategies for the period from the end of treatment to 5 years after diagnosis. We aimed to address this gap by developing recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems based on existing long-term follow-up (LTFU) care guidelines. Methods: The guideline working group, consisting of healthcare professionals, parents and survivor representatives from 10 countries, worked together to identify relevant health problems that may occur in survivors between the end of treatment and 5 years after diagnosis and to develop recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems. The recommendations were drawn from existing LTFU guidelines and adapted where necessary based on clinical expertise. Results: The working group developed 44 recommendations for short-term surveillance of health problems, which were divided into four categories based on the level of surveillance required: awareness only (n = 11), awareness, history and/or physical examination without surveillance test (n = 15), awareness, history and/or physical examination with potential surveillance test (n = 1) and awareness, history and/or physical examination with surveillance test (n = 17). Conclusion: The development of a guideline for short-term surveillance of health problems fills a critical gap in survivorship care for CAYA cancer survivors, providing much-needed support immediately after treatment up to 5 years after diagnosis. Implications for Cancer Survivors. This guideline will support healthcare professionals to provide appropriate follow-up care and improve the quality of life of CAYA cancer survivors.
- Open Access
- 28 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 19 (2) , 659-671
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a new European eHealth solution (SurPass v2.0): the PanCareSurPass Open Space study
Purpose: To identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) v2.0 in six long-term follow-up (LTFU) care centres in Europe. Methods: Stakeholders including childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), healthcare providers (HCPs), managers, information and technology (IT) specialists, and others, participated in six online Open Space meetings. Topics related to Care, Ethical, Legal, Social, Economic, and Information & IT-related aspects of implementing SurPass were evaluated. Results: The study identified 115 barriers and 159 facilitators. The main barriers included the lack of standardised LTFU care in centres and network cooperation, uncertainty about SurPass accessibility, and uncertainty about how to integrate SurPass into electronic health information systems. The main facilitators included standardised and coordinated LTFU care in centres, allowing CCSs to conceal sensitive information in SurPass and (semi)automatic data transfer and filing. Conclusions: Key barriers to SurPass implementation were identified in the areas of care, ethical considerations, and information & IT. To address these barriers and facilitate the implementation on SurPass, we have formulated 27 recommendations. Key recommendations include using the internationally developed protocols and guidelines to implement LTFU care, making clear decisions about which parties have access to SurPass data in accordance with CCSs, and facilitating (semi)automated data transfer and filing using Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Implications for Cancer Survivors: The findings of this study can help to implement SurPass and to ensure that cancer survivors receive high-quality LTFU care with access to the necessary information to manage their health effectively.
- 28 November 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Vol. 19 (2) , 659-671
Open AccessBarriers and facilitators to the implementation of a new European eHealth solution (SurPass v2.0): the PanCareSurPass Open Space study
Purpose: To identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) v2.0 in six long-term follow-up (LTFU) care centres in Europe. Methods: Stakeholders including childhood cancer survivors (CCSs), healthcare providers (HCPs), managers, information and technology (IT) specialists, and others, participated in six online Open Space meetings. Topics related to Care, Ethical, Legal, Social, Economic, and Information & IT-related aspects of implementing SurPass were evaluated. Results: The study identified 115 barriers and 159 facilitators. The main barriers included the lack of standardised LTFU care in centres and network cooperation, uncertainty about SurPass accessibility, and uncertainty about how to integrate SurPass into electronic health information systems. The main facilitators included standardised and coordinated LTFU care in centres, allowing CCSs to conceal sensitive information in SurPass and (semi)automatic data transfer and filing. Conclusions: Key barriers to SurPass implementation were identified in the areas of care, ethical considerations, and information & IT. To address these barriers and facilitate the implementation on SurPass, we have formulated 27 recommendations. Key recommendations include using the internationally developed protocols and guidelines to implement LTFU care, making clear decisions about which parties have access to SurPass data in accordance with CCSs, and facilitating (semi)automated data transfer and filing using Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Implications for Cancer Survivors: The findings of this study can help to implement SurPass and to ensure that cancer survivors receive high-quality LTFU care with access to the necessary information to manage their health effectively.