Richa Dwivedi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Richa Dwivedi has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ankita Saha
Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA
1 shared publication Bajarang Vasant Kumbhar
Department of Biological Sciences, Sunandan Divatia School of Science, NMIMS (Deemed to be) University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
1 shared publication- Chandravanu Dash
Center for AIDS Health Disparities Research, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1 shared publication - Kamal Kumar
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
1 shared publication - Muthukumar Balasubramaniam
Center for AIDS Health Disparities Research; Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Physiology, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN
1 shared publication - Piyush Baindara
Animal Science Research Center, Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
Beyond the Pandemic Era: Recent Advances and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Against Emerging Variants of Concern
Vaccination has been instrumental in curbing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and mitigating the severity of clinical manifestations associated with COVID-19. Numerous COVID-19 vaccines have been developed to this effect, including BioNTech-Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines, as well as adenovirus vector-based vaccines such as Oxford–AstraZeneca. However, the emergence of new variants and subvariants of SARS-CoV-2, characterized by enhanced transmissibility and immune evasion, poses significant challenges to the efficacy of current vaccination strategies. In this review, we aim to comprehensively outline the landscape of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and sub-lineages that have recently surfaced in the post-pandemic years. We assess the effectiveness of existing vaccines, including their booster doses, against these emerging variants and subvariants, such as BA.2-derived sub-lineages, XBB sub-lineages, and BA.2.86 (Pirola). Furthermore, we discuss the latest advancements in vaccine technology, including multivalent and pan-coronavirus approaches, along with the development of several next-generation coronavirus vaccines, such as exosome-based, virus-like particle (VLP), mucosal, and nanomaterial-based vaccines. Finally, we highlight the key challenges and critical areas for future research to address the evolving threat of SARS-CoV-2 subvariants and to develop strategies for combating the emergence of new viral threats, thereby improving preparedness for future pandemics.
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessBeyond the Pandemic Era: Recent Advances and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Against Emerging Variants of Concern
Vaccination has been instrumental in curbing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and mitigating the severity of clinical manifestations associated with COVID-19. Numerous COVID-19 vaccines have been developed to this effect, including BioNTech-Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines, as well as adenovirus vector-based vaccines such as Oxford–AstraZeneca. However, the emergence of new variants and subvariants of SARS-CoV-2, characterized by enhanced transmissibility and immune evasion, poses significant challenges to the efficacy of current vaccination strategies. In this review, we aim to comprehensively outline the landscape of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and sub-lineages that have recently surfaced in the post-pandemic years. We assess the effectiveness of existing vaccines, including their booster doses, against these emerging variants and subvariants, such as BA.2-derived sub-lineages, XBB sub-lineages, and BA.2.86 (Pirola). Furthermore, we discuss the latest advancements in vaccine technology, including multivalent and pan-coronavirus approaches, along with the development of several next-generation coronavirus vaccines, such as exosome-based, virus-like particle (VLP), mucosal, and nanomaterial-based vaccines. Finally, we highlight the key challenges and critical areas for future research to address the evolving threat of SARS-CoV-2 subvariants and to develop strategies for combating the emergence of new viral threats, thereby improving preparedness for future pandemics.
- Open Access
- 16 January 2024
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in mBio
- Vol. 15 (1) , e0021222
HIV-1 capsid and viral DNA integration
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genome encodes 15 proteins that perform structural, enzymatic, regulatory, and accessory functions. The capsid protein (CA) is the primary structural protein of HIV-1 and plays multiple functions during infection. Early studies predicted that HIV-1 CA mainly protected and delivered the viral genome to the target cell. However, it is now well established that CA plays a critical role after the cellular entry steps of infection. During the early stages, CA promotes reverse transcription of the RNA genome into a DNA copy and the nuclear import/entry step of HIV-1 infection. Emerging evidence also supports the functional role of CA in the post-nuclear entry steps of infection, such as HIV-1 integration. During the late stages of infection, CA coordinates hexameric lattice formation for the assembly of immature virion. CA also regulates theformation of the mature capsid that encases the viral genome and associated factors in the infectious progeny virion. Because of these indispensable roles, HIV-1 CA has emerged as a new and validated target for antiviral drug development. Accordingly, the first CA-targeting drug, lenacapavir (GS-6207), was recently approved to treat certain HIV-1-infected individuals whose viral load cannot be controlled by other antiviral drugs. Still, new and superior CA inhibitors are needed to qualify as part of the front-line antiviral therapy regimens for all infected individuals. The development of such inhibitors requires a clear understanding of CA’s role in HIV-1 infection. In this review, we will describe CA’s role during the early stages of HIV-1 infection, with particular emphasis on post-nuclear entry steps. IMPORTANCE: HIV-1 capsid protein (CA)—independently or by recruiting host factors—mediates several key steps of virus replication in the cytoplasm and nucleus of the target cell. Research in the recent years have established that CA is multifunctional and genetically fragile of all the HIV-1 proteins. Accordingly, CA has emerged as a validated and high priority therapeutic target, and the first CA-targeting antiviral drug was recently approved for treating multi-drug resistant HIV-1 infection. However, development of next generation CA inhibitors depends on a better understanding of CA’s known roles, as well as probing of CA’s novel roles, in HIV-1 replication. In this timely review, we present an updated overview of the current state of our understanding of CA’s multifunctional role in HIV-1 replication—with a special emphasis on CA’s newfound post-nuclear roles, highlight the pressing knowledge gaps, and discuss directions for future research.
- 16 January 2024
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in mBio
- Vol. 15 (1) , e0021222
Open AccessHIV-1 capsid and viral DNA integration
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genome encodes 15 proteins that perform structural, enzymatic, regulatory, and accessory functions. The capsid protein (CA) is the primary structural protein of HIV-1 and plays multiple functions during infection. Early studies predicted that HIV-1 CA mainly protected and delivered the viral genome to the target cell. However, it is now well established that CA plays a critical role after the cellular entry steps of infection. During the early stages, CA promotes reverse transcription of the RNA genome into a DNA copy and the nuclear import/entry step of HIV-1 infection. Emerging evidence also supports the functional role of CA in the post-nuclear entry steps of infection, such as HIV-1 integration. During the late stages of infection, CA coordinates hexameric lattice formation for the assembly of immature virion. CA also regulates theformation of the mature capsid that encases the viral genome and associated factors in the infectious progeny virion. Because of these indispensable roles, HIV-1 CA has emerged as a new and validated target for antiviral drug development. Accordingly, the first CA-targeting drug, lenacapavir (GS-6207), was recently approved to treat certain HIV-1-infected individuals whose viral load cannot be controlled by other antiviral drugs. Still, new and superior CA inhibitors are needed to qualify as part of the front-line antiviral therapy regimens for all infected individuals. The development of such inhibitors requires a clear understanding of CA’s role in HIV-1 infection. In this review, we will describe CA’s role during the early stages of HIV-1 infection, with particular emphasis on post-nuclear entry steps. IMPORTANCE: HIV-1 capsid protein (CA)—independently or by recruiting host factors—mediates several key steps of virus replication in the cytoplasm and nucleus of the target cell. Research in the recent years have established that CA is multifunctional and genetically fragile of all the HIV-1 proteins. Accordingly, CA has emerged as a validated and high priority therapeutic target, and the first CA-targeting antiviral drug was recently approved for treating multi-drug resistant HIV-1 infection. However, development of next generation CA inhibitors depends on a better understanding of CA’s known roles, as well as probing of CA’s novel roles, in HIV-1 replication. In this timely review, we present an updated overview of the current state of our understanding of CA’s multifunctional role in HIV-1 replication—with a special emphasis on CA’s newfound post-nuclear roles, highlight the pressing knowledge gaps, and discuss directions for future research.
- Open Access
- 8 December 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 11 (12) , 2944
Differential Regulation of TFEB-Induced Autophagy during Mtb Infection and Starvation
Through the promotion of phagolysosome formation, autophagy has emerged as a crucial mechanism to eradicate intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). A cell-autonomous host defense mechanism called lysosome biogenesis and autophagy transports cytoplasmic cargos and bacterial phagosomes to lysosomes for destruction during infection. Similar occurrences occurred in stressful or starvation circumstances and led to autophagy, which is harmful to the cell. It is interesting to note that under both hunger and infection states, the transcription factor EB (TFEB) acts as a master regulator of lysosomal activities and autophagy. This review highlighted recent research on the multitier regulation of TFEB-induced autophagy by a variety of host effectors and Mtb sulfolipid during Mtb infection and starvation. In general, the research presented here sheds light on how lysosome biogenesis and autophagy are differentially regulated by the TFEB during Mtb infection and starvation.
- 8 December 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Microorganisms
- Vol. 11 (12) , 2944
Open AccessDifferential Regulation of TFEB-Induced Autophagy during Mtb Infection and Starvation
Through the promotion of phagolysosome formation, autophagy has emerged as a crucial mechanism to eradicate intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). A cell-autonomous host defense mechanism called lysosome biogenesis and autophagy transports cytoplasmic cargos and bacterial phagosomes to lysosomes for destruction during infection. Similar occurrences occurred in stressful or starvation circumstances and led to autophagy, which is harmful to the cell. It is interesting to note that under both hunger and infection states, the transcription factor EB (TFEB) acts as a master regulator of lysosomal activities and autophagy. This review highlighted recent research on the multitier regulation of TFEB-induced autophagy by a variety of host effectors and Mtb sulfolipid during Mtb infection and starvation. In general, the research presented here sheds light on how lysosome biogenesis and autophagy are differentially regulated by the TFEB during Mtb infection and starvation.