Wendy Hartzell
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Wendy Hartzell has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Arthur Santos
Energy Institute Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA
2 shared publications - Daniel Zimmerle
Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2 shared publications - Mercy Mbua
Methane Emission Technology Evaluation Center (METEC), Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
2 shared publications - Stuart N. Riddick
Department of Science, Engineering and Aviation, University of the Highlands and Islands, Perth, UK, UK
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 5 February 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Atmosphere
- Vol. 15 (2) , 202
Potential Underestimate in Reported Bottom-up Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in the Delaware Basin
Methane is a greenhouse gas and identified as a key driver of near-term climate change. Bottom-up approaches estimate annual methane loss from US natural gas production and transport at 6 Tg, but recent studies suggest this may be an underestimate. To investigate this possibility, an equipment-based emissions inventory, using EPA emission factors, was developed to calculate methane emissions from oil and gas operations in the Delaware basin, USA. Emission factors and activity data were then updated using contemporary and region-specific measurement data. The original inventory estimated emissions at 315 Gg CH4 y−1 (gas production-normalized rate of 0.6% loss), while the updated inventory estimated emissions of 1500 Gg CH4 y−1 (2.8% loss). The largest changes resulted from large fugitive emissions from oil production (+430 Gg CH4 y−1), updating maintenance activity emissions (+214 Gg CH4 y−1), considering flaring inefficiency (+174 Gg CH4 y−1), and the inclusion of associated gas venting (+136 Gg CH4 y−1). This study suggests that a systematic underestimate probably exists in current bottom-up inventories and identifies sources currently missing or may be incorrect. We also strongly recommend that emission factors should be validated through direct comparison against measurement campaigns that include long-tail distributions typical of oil and gas activities.
- 5 February 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Atmosphere
- Vol. 15 (2) , 202
Open AccessPotential Underestimate in Reported Bottom-up Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in the Delaware Basin
Methane is a greenhouse gas and identified as a key driver of near-term climate change. Bottom-up approaches estimate annual methane loss from US natural gas production and transport at 6 Tg, but recent studies suggest this may be an underestimate. To investigate this possibility, an equipment-based emissions inventory, using EPA emission factors, was developed to calculate methane emissions from oil and gas operations in the Delaware basin, USA. Emission factors and activity data were then updated using contemporary and region-specific measurement data. The original inventory estimated emissions at 315 Gg CH4 y−1 (gas production-normalized rate of 0.6% loss), while the updated inventory estimated emissions of 1500 Gg CH4 y−1 (2.8% loss). The largest changes resulted from large fugitive emissions from oil production (+430 Gg CH4 y−1), updating maintenance activity emissions (+214 Gg CH4 y−1), considering flaring inefficiency (+174 Gg CH4 y−1), and the inclusion of associated gas venting (+136 Gg CH4 y−1). This study suggests that a systematic underestimate probably exists in current bottom-up inventories and identifies sources currently missing or may be incorrect. We also strongly recommend that emission factors should be validated through direct comparison against measurement campaigns that include long-tail distributions typical of oil and gas activities.
- Open Access
- 12 December 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Reconciling Top-down and Bottom-up Methane Emissions Estimates in the Delaware Basin
Methane is a greenhouse gas and identified as a key driver of near-term climate change. Bottom-up approaches estimate annual methane loss from US natural gas production and transport at 6 Tg, but recent studies suggest this may be an underestimate. To investigate this possibility, an equipment-based emissions inventory, using EPA emission factors, was developed to calculate methane emissions from oil and gas operations in the Delaware Basin, USA. Emission factors and activity data were then updated using contemporary and region-specific measurement data. The original inventory estimated emissions at 315 Gg CH4 y-1 (gas production-normalized rate of 0.6% loss), while the updated inventory estimated emissions of 1,500 Gg CH4 y-1 (2.8% loss). The largest changes resulted from large fugitive emissions from oil production (+430 Gg CH4 y-1), updating maintenance activity emissions (+214 Gg CH4 y-1), considering flaring inefficiency (+174 Gg CH4 y-1), and the inclusion of associated gas venting (+136 Gg CH4 y-1). This study suggests that a systematic underestimate probably exists in current bottom-up inventories and identifies sources currently missing or may be incorrect. We also strongly recommend that emission factors should be validated through direct comparison against measurement campaigns that include long-tail distributions typical of oil and gas activities.
- 12 December 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessReconciling Top-down and Bottom-up Methane Emissions Estimates in the Delaware Basin
Methane is a greenhouse gas and identified as a key driver of near-term climate change. Bottom-up approaches estimate annual methane loss from US natural gas production and transport at 6 Tg, but recent studies suggest this may be an underestimate. To investigate this possibility, an equipment-based emissions inventory, using EPA emission factors, was developed to calculate methane emissions from oil and gas operations in the Delaware Basin, USA. Emission factors and activity data were then updated using contemporary and region-specific measurement data. The original inventory estimated emissions at 315 Gg CH4 y-1 (gas production-normalized rate of 0.6% loss), while the updated inventory estimated emissions of 1,500 Gg CH4 y-1 (2.8% loss). The largest changes resulted from large fugitive emissions from oil production (+430 Gg CH4 y-1), updating maintenance activity emissions (+214 Gg CH4 y-1), considering flaring inefficiency (+174 Gg CH4 y-1), and the inclusion of associated gas venting (+136 Gg CH4 y-1). This study suggests that a systematic underestimate probably exists in current bottom-up inventories and identifies sources currently missing or may be incorrect. We also strongly recommend that emission factors should be validated through direct comparison against measurement campaigns that include long-tail distributions typical of oil and gas activities.