Ben Andagalu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Ben Andagalu has a total of 79 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Carolyne Nasimiyu
Global Health Program, Washington State University (WSU), Nairobi 00100, Kenya
2 shared publications - Charles Todd Davis
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
2 shared publications - Christine M. Szablewski
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
2 shared publications - Clayton Onyango
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention—Kenya, KEMRI Complex, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Village Market, Nairobi P.O. Box 606-00621, Kenya
2 shared publications - Doris Marwanga
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
2 shared publications - Elizabeth Hunsperger
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi 00621, Kenya
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Detection of Influenza and Other Respiratory Pathogens by RT-qPCR and Characterization by Genomic Sequencing Using ILI/SARI Hospital-Based Sentinel Surveillance System
Limited surveillance and laboratory testing for non-influenza viruses remains a challenge in Uganda. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated National Influenza Center (NIC) tested samples from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infections (SARIs) during August 2022–February 2023. We leveraged the influenza sentinel surveillance system to detect other respiratory viruses (ORVs). Samples were tested using the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) influenza and SARS-CoV-2 multiplex and the FTDTM Respiratory Pathogens 21 assays using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 687 (ILI = 471 (68.6%) and SARI = 216 (31.4%) samples were tested. The median age was 2 years (IQR: 1–25) for ILI and 6 years (IQR: 1–18) for SARI case definitions (p-value = 0.045). One or more respiratory pathogens were detected in 38.7% (n = 266) of all samples; 33 (12.4%) were selected for metagenomics sequencing and 8 (3%) for SARS-CoV-2 targeted sequencing. Respiratory pathogens were detected by sequencing in 23 of 33 (69.7%) samples. Our study provides insight into the usefulness of this surveillance system in conducting virological testing for other viruses and provides tools and evidence to monitor patterns and characteristics of viruses causing ILI/SARI, which will guide public health decisions and interventions in Uganda.
Open AccessDetection of Influenza and Other Respiratory Pathogens by RT-qPCR and Characterization by Genomic Sequencing Using ILI/SARI Hospital-Based Sentinel Surveillance System
Limited surveillance and laboratory testing for non-influenza viruses remains a challenge in Uganda. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated National Influenza Center (NIC) tested samples from patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infections (SARIs) during August 2022–February 2023. We leveraged the influenza sentinel surveillance system to detect other respiratory viruses (ORVs). Samples were tested using the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) influenza and SARS-CoV-2 multiplex and the FTDTM Respiratory Pathogens 21 assays using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 687 (ILI = 471 (68.6%) and SARI = 216 (31.4%) samples were tested. The median age was 2 years (IQR: 1–25) for ILI and 6 years (IQR: 1–18) for SARI case definitions (p-value = 0.045). One or more respiratory pathogens were detected in 38.7% (n = 266) of all samples; 33 (12.4%) were selected for metagenomics sequencing and 8 (3%) for SARS-CoV-2 targeted sequencing. Respiratory pathogens were detected by sequencing in 23 of 33 (69.7%) samples. Our study provides insight into the usefulness of this surveillance system in conducting virological testing for other viruses and provides tools and evidence to monitor patterns and characteristics of viruses causing ILI/SARI, which will guide public health decisions and interventions in Uganda.
- Open Access
- 29 May 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 232 (3) , e372-e382
Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E Only Seen in Baseline Parasitemic and Not Baseline Aparasitemic Plasmodium falciparum-Exposed, Drug-Treated Kenyan Adults
Background: RTS,S/AS01 vaccine efficacy (VE) was previously shown as lower in African adults than in malaria-naive US adults, potentially due to concurrent Plasmodium falciparum infections. We investigated whether treatment of infection prior to vaccination would lead to improved VE and immunogenicity. Methods: A phase 2b study in Kenyan adults evaluated the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E in conjunction with antimalarial chemopreventive drugs. Participants, grouped by baseline presence or absence of P. falciparum infections, were randomized to receive RTS,S/AS01E or rabies vaccine. Four groups received antimalarial drugs prior to immunization and were followed for 6 months to assess P. falciparum infection. We included an additional group not treated with antimalarial drugs for immunological assessment. Results: VE (RTS,S/AS01E vs rabies vaccine) was 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9% to 53.4%) and −24.0% (95% CI, −97% to 22.4%) in baseline P. falciparum-positive and P. falciparum-negative participants, respectively. In RTS,S/AS01E recipients, there were no statistical differences in anticircumsporozoite (anti-CS) antibody titers in baseline P. falciparum-positive or P. falciparum-negative participants, or in susceptibility to infection during the postvaccination follow-up period. Drug treatment did not improve anti-CS antibody titers. Conclusions: Treating P. falciparum infections during vaccination does not result in increased VE. Anti-CS antibody responses to vaccination do not differ with baseline P. falciparum infection status, drug treatment, or susceptibility to P. falciparum infections. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04661579; PACTR202006896481432.
- 29 May 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 232 (3) , e372-e382
Open AccessEfficacy of RTS,S/AS01E Only Seen in Baseline Parasitemic and Not Baseline Aparasitemic Plasmodium falciparum-Exposed, Drug-Treated Kenyan Adults
Background: RTS,S/AS01 vaccine efficacy (VE) was previously shown as lower in African adults than in malaria-naive US adults, potentially due to concurrent Plasmodium falciparum infections. We investigated whether treatment of infection prior to vaccination would lead to improved VE and immunogenicity. Methods: A phase 2b study in Kenyan adults evaluated the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E in conjunction with antimalarial chemopreventive drugs. Participants, grouped by baseline presence or absence of P. falciparum infections, were randomized to receive RTS,S/AS01E or rabies vaccine. Four groups received antimalarial drugs prior to immunization and were followed for 6 months to assess P. falciparum infection. We included an additional group not treated with antimalarial drugs for immunological assessment. Results: VE (RTS,S/AS01E vs rabies vaccine) was 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9% to 53.4%) and −24.0% (95% CI, −97% to 22.4%) in baseline P. falciparum-positive and P. falciparum-negative participants, respectively. In RTS,S/AS01E recipients, there were no statistical differences in anticircumsporozoite (anti-CS) antibody titers in baseline P. falciparum-positive or P. falciparum-negative participants, or in susceptibility to infection during the postvaccination follow-up period. Drug treatment did not improve anti-CS antibody titers. Conclusions: Treating P. falciparum infections during vaccination does not result in increased VE. Anti-CS antibody responses to vaccination do not differ with baseline P. falciparum infection status, drug treatment, or susceptibility to P. falciparum infections. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04661579; PACTR202006896481432.
- Open Access
Characterization of Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Kenyan Live Bird Markets and Wild Bird Habitats Reveal Genetically Diverse Subtypes and High Proportion of A(H9N2), 2018–2020
Following the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus in countries bordering Kenya to the west, we conducted surveillance among domestic and wild birds along the shores of Lake Victoria. In addition, between 2018 and 2020, we conducted surveillance among poultry and poultry workers in live bird markets and among wild migratory birds in various lakes that are resting sites during migration to assess introduction and circulation of avian influenza viruses in these populations. We tested 7464 specimens (oropharyngeal (OP) and cloacal specimens) from poultry and 6531 fresh fecal specimens from wild birds for influenza A viruses by real-time RT-PCR. Influenza was detected in 3.9% (n = 292) of specimens collected from poultry and 0.2% (n = 10) of fecal specimens from wild birds. On hemagglutinin subtyping, most of the influenza A positives from poultry (274/292, 93.8%) were H9. Of 34 H9 specimens randomly selected for further subtyping, all were H9N2. On phylogenetic analysis, these viruses were genetically similar to other H9 viruses detected in East Africa. Only two of the ten influenza A-positive specimens from the wild bird fecal specimens were successfully subtyped; sequencing analysis of one specimen collected in 2018 was identified as a low-pathogenicity avian influenza H5N2 virus of the Eurasian lineage, and the second specimen, collected in 2020, was subtyped as H11. A total of 18 OP and nasal specimens from poultry workers with acute respiratory illness (12%) were collected; none were positive for influenza A virus. We observed significant circulation of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry in live bird markets in Kenya. During the same period, low-pathogenic H5N2 virus was detected in a fecal specimen collected in a site hosting a variety of migratory and resident birds. Although HPAI H5N8 was not detected in this survey, these results highlight the potential for the introduction and establishment of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in poultry populations and the associated risk of spillover to human populations.
Open AccessCharacterization of Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Kenyan Live Bird Markets and Wild Bird Habitats Reveal Genetically Diverse Subtypes and High Proportion of A(H9N2), 2018–2020
Following the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus in countries bordering Kenya to the west, we conducted surveillance among domestic and wild birds along the shores of Lake Victoria. In addition, between 2018 and 2020, we conducted surveillance among poultry and poultry workers in live bird markets and among wild migratory birds in various lakes that are resting sites during migration to assess introduction and circulation of avian influenza viruses in these populations. We tested 7464 specimens (oropharyngeal (OP) and cloacal specimens) from poultry and 6531 fresh fecal specimens from wild birds for influenza A viruses by real-time RT-PCR. Influenza was detected in 3.9% (n = 292) of specimens collected from poultry and 0.2% (n = 10) of fecal specimens from wild birds. On hemagglutinin subtyping, most of the influenza A positives from poultry (274/292, 93.8%) were H9. Of 34 H9 specimens randomly selected for further subtyping, all were H9N2. On phylogenetic analysis, these viruses were genetically similar to other H9 viruses detected in East Africa. Only two of the ten influenza A-positive specimens from the wild bird fecal specimens were successfully subtyped; sequencing analysis of one specimen collected in 2018 was identified as a low-pathogenicity avian influenza H5N2 virus of the Eurasian lineage, and the second specimen, collected in 2020, was subtyped as H11. A total of 18 OP and nasal specimens from poultry workers with acute respiratory illness (12%) were collected; none were positive for influenza A virus. We observed significant circulation of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry in live bird markets in Kenya. During the same period, low-pathogenic H5N2 virus was detected in a fecal specimen collected in a site hosting a variety of migratory and resident birds. Although HPAI H5N8 was not detected in this survey, these results highlight the potential for the introduction and establishment of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in poultry populations and the associated risk of spillover to human populations.
- Open Access
- 8 August 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Characterization of Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Kenyan Live Bird Markets and Wild Bird Habitats Reveal Genetically Diverse Subtypes and High Proportion of A(H9N2), 2018-2020
Following the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus in countries bordering Kenya to the west, we conducted surveillance among domestic and wild birds along the shores of Lake Victoria. In addition, between 2018 and 2020, we conducted surveillance among poultry and poultry workers in live bird markets and among wild migratory birds in various lakes that are resting sites during migration to assess introduction and circulation of avian influenza viruses in these populations. We tested 7,464 specimens (oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs) from poultry and 6,531 fresh fecal specimens from wild birds for influenza A viruses by real-time RT-PCR. Influenza was detected in 3.9% (n=292) of specimens collected from poultry and 0.2% (n=10) of fecal specimens from wild birds. On hemagglutinin subtyping, most of the influenza A positives from poultry (274/292, 93.8%) were H9. Of 34 H9 specimens randomly selected for further subtyping, all were H9N2. On phylogenetic analysis, these viruses were genetically similar to other H9 viruses detected in East Africa. Only two of the ten influenza A positive specimens from the wild bird fecal specimens were successfully subtyped; sequencing analysis of one specimen collected in 2018 was identified as low pathogenicity avian influenza H5N2 virus of the Eurasian lineage and the second specimen, collected in 2020, was subtyped as H11. A total of 18 OP/NS swabs from poultry workers with ARI (12%) were collected; none were positive for influenza A virus. We observed significant circulation of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry in live bird markets in Kenya. During the same period, low pathogenic H5N2 virus was detected in a fecal specimen collected in a site hosting a variety of migratory and resident birds. Although HPAI H5N8 was not detected in this survey, these results highlight the potential for introduction and establishment of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in poultry populations and the associated risk of spillover to human populations.
- 8 August 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessCharacterization of Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Kenyan Live Bird Markets and Wild Bird Habitats Reveal Genetically Diverse Subtypes and High Proportion of A(H9N2), 2018-2020
Following the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus in countries bordering Kenya to the west, we conducted surveillance among domestic and wild birds along the shores of Lake Victoria. In addition, between 2018 and 2020, we conducted surveillance among poultry and poultry workers in live bird markets and among wild migratory birds in various lakes that are resting sites during migration to assess introduction and circulation of avian influenza viruses in these populations. We tested 7,464 specimens (oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs) from poultry and 6,531 fresh fecal specimens from wild birds for influenza A viruses by real-time RT-PCR. Influenza was detected in 3.9% (n=292) of specimens collected from poultry and 0.2% (n=10) of fecal specimens from wild birds. On hemagglutinin subtyping, most of the influenza A positives from poultry (274/292, 93.8%) were H9. Of 34 H9 specimens randomly selected for further subtyping, all were H9N2. On phylogenetic analysis, these viruses were genetically similar to other H9 viruses detected in East Africa. Only two of the ten influenza A positive specimens from the wild bird fecal specimens were successfully subtyped; sequencing analysis of one specimen collected in 2018 was identified as low pathogenicity avian influenza H5N2 virus of the Eurasian lineage and the second specimen, collected in 2020, was subtyped as H11. A total of 18 OP/NS swabs from poultry workers with ARI (12%) were collected; none were positive for influenza A virus. We observed significant circulation of H9N2 influenza viruses in poultry in live bird markets in Kenya. During the same period, low pathogenic H5N2 virus was detected in a fecal specimen collected in a site hosting a variety of migratory and resident birds. Although HPAI H5N8 was not detected in this survey, these results highlight the potential for introduction and establishment of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in poultry populations and the associated risk of spillover to human populations.
- Open Access
- 6 December 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
- Vol. 37, 101596
Comparative analysis of peripheral whole blood transcriptome from asymptomatic carriers reveals upregulation of subsets of surface proteins implicated in Plasmodium falciparum phenotypic plasticity
- 6 December 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
- Vol. 37, 101596
Open AccessComparative analysis of peripheral whole blood transcriptome from asymptomatic carriers reveals upregulation of subsets of surface proteins implicated in Plasmodium falciparum phenotypic plasticity