Attila Ádám Szabó

Background/Objectives: Human serum albumin (HSA) is a major endogenous inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and helps fine-tune the activity of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), thereby potentially influencing the development of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. As the principal transport protein for free fatty acids (FFAs), HSA may have its ACE-inhibitory capacity modified by its FFA cargo and, through this mechanism, may also affect CV disease risk. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the composition of HSA-bound FFAs determines the magnitude of endogenous ACE inhibition. Methods: We quantified endogenous ACE inhibition and examined the effect of FFA concentration on this inhibition in clinical patients (n = 161 and n = 101, respectively). We measured the effects of HSA treated with saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated FFAs, as well as FFA-free HSA, on recombinant ACE and on tissue ACE. Results: Endogenous ACE inhibition was stronger in patients with higher serum HSA concentrations (Spearman’s rho = 0.422, 95% CI 0.281–0.544, p < 0.001), whereas total FFA concentration was not associated with endogenous ACE inhibition (Spearman’s rho = 0.088, p = 0.38, n = 101). However, removal of free fatty acids substantially worsened the ACE-inhibitory effect of HSA on recombinant ACE (charcoal-treated HSA: IC₅₀ = 23.24 [19.40–29.78] g/L vs. control HSA: 7.84 [6.58–9.75] g/L, p < 0.001) and on tissue ACE isolated from lung, heart, and lymph node. FFA chain length, degree and position of unsaturation, and cis/trans configuration all differentially modulated endogenous ACE inhibition. Among saturated fatty acids, stearic acid (IC₅₀ = 7.98 [7.04–9.23] g/L), and among omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, α-linolenic (IC₅₀ = 5.60 [4.28–6.15] g/L) and γ-linolenic acids (IC₅₀ = 5.09 [4.28–6.15] g/L) produced the greatest enhancement of the ACE-inhibitory capacity of HSA. Conclusions: The present results indicate that HSA concentration relates to endogenous ACE inhibition in serum, and in vitro experiments demonstrate that HSA-bound FFAs can modulate HSA-mediated ACE inhibition, a mechanism that may be relevant to cardiovascular physiology and disease.

Background/Objectives: Urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme (uACE) activity has long been regarded as a promising biomarker for kidney and cardiovascular diseases; however, its clinical applicability has been limited by the presence of endogenous urinary inhibitors and technically demanding assay protocols. We aimed to establish a fast and reproducible method for measuring uACE activity to identify the inhibitory compounds responsible for previous assay failures and to define practical preanalytical conditions suitable for routine laboratory implementation. Methods: A fluorescence-based kinetic assay was optimized for urine samples. Endogenous inhibitors were isolated by membrane filtration and chemically characterized, while the effect of sample dilution was evaluated as a simplified alternative for eliminating inhibitory interference. We assessed the stability of ACE activity under various storage conditions to support reliable measurement. Results: Urea (IC₅₀ = 1.18 M), uric acid (IC₅₀ = 3.61 × 10⁻³ M), and urobilinogen (IC₅₀ = 2.98 × 10⁻⁴ M) were identified as the principal reversible inhibitors, jointly accounting for up to 90% suppression of uACE activity. Their inhibitory effect was effectively eliminated by a 128-fold dilution. ACE activity remained stable for 24 h at 25 °C but was completely lost after freezing. A strong positive correlation between uACE activity and creatinine concentration (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001) justified normalization. ACE activity-to-creatinine ratio turned out to be significantly lower in ACE inhibitor-treated patients than in untreated controls (6.49 vs. 36.69 U/mol, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that accurate measurement of uACE activity is feasible using a rapid dilution-based protocol. The normalized ACE activity can serve as a practical biomarker for detecting pharmacological ACE inhibition and monitoring therapy adherence in cardiovascular care and may also provide insight into renal pathophysiology such as tubular injury or local RAAS-related processes.

Angiotensin–converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the primarily chosen drugs to treat various cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension. Although the most recent guidelines do not differentiate among the various ACE inhibitory drugs, there are substantial pharmacological differences. Goal: Here, we tested if lipophilicity affects the efficacy of ACE inhibitory drugs when used as the first therapy in newly identified hypertensives in a prospective study. Methods: We tested the differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of the hydrophilic lisinopril (8.3 ± 3.0 mg/day) and the lipophilic enalapril (5.5 ± 2.3 mg/day) (n = 59 patients). The cardiovascular parameters were determined using sonography (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in the brachial artery, intima-media thickness of the carotid artery), 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (peripheral arterial blood pressure), and arteriography (aortic blood pressure, augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity) before and after the initiation of ACE inhibitor therapy. Results: Both enalapril and lisinopril decreased blood pressure. However, lisinopril failed to improve arterial endothelial function (lack of effects on FMD) when compared to enalapril. Enalapril-mediated improved arterial endothelial function (FMD) positively correlated with its blood–pressure–lowering effect. In contrast, there was no correlation between the decrease in systolic blood pressure and FMD in the case of lisinopril treatment. Conclusion: The blood–pressure–lowering effects of ACE inhibitor drugs are independent of their lipophilicity. In contrast, the effects of ACE inhibition on arterial endothelial function are associated with lipophilicity: the hydrophilic lisinopril was unable to improve, while the lipophilic enalapril significantly improved endothelial function. Moreover, the effects on blood pressure and endothelial function did not correlate in lisinopril-treated patients, suggesting divergent mechanisms in the regulation of blood pressure and endothelial function upon ACE inhibitory treatment.