APAngie M. Paik

Angie M. Paik

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Angie M. Paik has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Isolated and combined breast augmentation in transgender patients: Multi-institutional insights into early outcomes and risk factors

    by Samuel Knoedler, Leonard Knoedler, Benedikt Geldner, Iman Ghanad, Bong-Sung Kim, Michael Alfertshofer, Hans-Guenther Machens, Peter Niclas Broer, Bohdan Pomahac, Martin Kauke-Navarro, et al.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    by Samuel Knoedler, Rainer Schliermann, Leonard Knoedler, Mengfan Wu, Frederik J. Hansen, Dany Y. Matar, Doha Obed, Dominique Md Vervoort, Valentin Haug, Gabriel Hundeshagen, et al.

    Background: Surgeons have historically used age as a preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes. Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to disease or biological age, has been proposed as a more accurate risk predictor. The prognostic value of sarcopenia assessment in surgical patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, the authors aimed to synthesize the available literature and investigate the impact of sarcopenia on perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties. Methods: The authors systematically assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to 1st October 2022. Their primary outcomes were complication occurrence, mortality, length of operation and hospital stay, discharge to home, and postdischarge survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Sensitivity analysis was performed by focusing on studies with an oncological, cardiovascular, emergency, or transplant surgery population and on those of higher quality or prospective study design. Results: A total of 294 studies comprising 97 643 patients, of which 33 070 had sarcopenia, were included in our analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater mortality, complication occurrence, length of hospital stay, and lower rates of discharge to home (all PPPPP=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively) patients with sarcopenia. In the transplant surgery cohort, mortality was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia (PP=0.007). Sensitivity analysis based on higher quality studies and prospective studies showed that sarcopenia remained a significant predictor of mortality and complication occurrence (all P<0.00001). Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia can help surgeons identify patients at risk, critically balance eligibility, and refine perioperative management. Large-scale studies are required to further validate the importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator of perioperative risk, especially in surgical subspecialties.