Angie M. Paik
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Angie M. Paik has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bohdan Pomahac
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
2 shared publications - Martin Kauke-Navarro
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
2 shared publications - Samuel Knoedler
Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, TUM University Hospital Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
2 shared publications - Adriana C. Panayi
BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg
1 shared publication - Benedikt Geldner
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
1 shared publication Bong-Sung Kim
Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Vol. 90, 149-160
Isolated and combined breast augmentation in transgender patients: Multi-institutional insights into early outcomes and risk factors
- 1 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Vol. 90, 149-160
Isolated and combined breast augmentation in transgender patients: Multi-institutional insights into early outcomes and risk factors
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 7 September 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 109 (12) , 4238-4262
Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Surgeons have historically used age as a preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes. Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to disease or biological age, has been proposed as a more accurate risk predictor. The prognostic value of sarcopenia assessment in surgical patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, the authors aimed to synthesize the available literature and investigate the impact of sarcopenia on perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties. Methods: The authors systematically assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to 1st October 2022. Their primary outcomes were complication occurrence, mortality, length of operation and hospital stay, discharge to home, and postdischarge survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Sensitivity analysis was performed by focusing on studies with an oncological, cardiovascular, emergency, or transplant surgery population and on those of higher quality or prospective study design. Results: A total of 294 studies comprising 97 643 patients, of which 33 070 had sarcopenia, were included in our analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater mortality, complication occurrence, length of hospital stay, and lower rates of discharge to home (all PPPPP=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively) patients with sarcopenia. In the transplant surgery cohort, mortality was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia (PP=0.007). Sensitivity analysis based on higher quality studies and prospective studies showed that sarcopenia remained a significant predictor of mortality and complication occurrence (all P<0.00001). Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia can help surgeons identify patients at risk, critically balance eligibility, and refine perioperative management. Large-scale studies are required to further validate the importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator of perioperative risk, especially in surgical subspecialties.
- 7 September 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 109 (12) , 4238-4262
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessImpact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Surgeons have historically used age as a preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes. Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to disease or biological age, has been proposed as a more accurate risk predictor. The prognostic value of sarcopenia assessment in surgical patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, the authors aimed to synthesize the available literature and investigate the impact of sarcopenia on perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties. Methods: The authors systematically assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to 1st October 2022. Their primary outcomes were complication occurrence, mortality, length of operation and hospital stay, discharge to home, and postdischarge survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification system. Sensitivity analysis was performed by focusing on studies with an oncological, cardiovascular, emergency, or transplant surgery population and on those of higher quality or prospective study design. Results: A total of 294 studies comprising 97 643 patients, of which 33 070 had sarcopenia, were included in our analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater mortality, complication occurrence, length of hospital stay, and lower rates of discharge to home (all PPPPP=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively) patients with sarcopenia. In the transplant surgery cohort, mortality was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia (PP=0.007). Sensitivity analysis based on higher quality studies and prospective studies showed that sarcopenia remained a significant predictor of mortality and complication occurrence (all P<0.00001). Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia can help surgeons identify patients at risk, critically balance eligibility, and refine perioperative management. Large-scale studies are required to further validate the importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator of perioperative risk, especially in surgical subspecialties.