SESteffen T. Eberhardt

Steffen T. Eberhardt

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Steffen T. Eberhardt has a total of 48 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    From fragmentation to transtheoretical models of psychological therapy

    by Wolfgang Lutz, Steffen T. Eberhardt, Fabienne Mink, Winfried Rief


  • Open Access

    The Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN)

    by Steffen T. Eberhardt, Antonia Vehlen, Anika Wege, Antonia Stachelscheid, Wolfgang Lutz

    The Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN) is an adaptive feedback system for psychotherapy developed within ongoing research on measurement-based care and quality assurance. To accommodate different implementation environments, the TTN is available in two operational settings: TN-PRO for private outpatient practice and TN-HUB for research clinics and training centers. Both share the same core architecture but differ in their feature configurations and technical requirements. Key components include routine outcome monitoring, individualized treatment recommendations, early warning signals for patients at risk of unfavorable treatment response, and clinical support tools to guide treatment adaptation. The system is a non-commercial scientific project aimed at investigating the outcomes and processes of data-informed psychotherapy. Future work will focus on technological innovation and exploratory dissemination in private practice. This article aims to describe the conceptual framework, core components, and implementation settings of the TTN for clinicians, researchers, and training institutions interested in feedback-informed treatment and measurement-based care.


  • Open Access

    Development and validation of large language model rating scales for automatically transcribed psychological therapy sessions

    by Steffen T. Eberhardt, Antonia Vehlen, Jana Schaffrath, Brian Schwartz, Tobias Baur, Dominik Schiller, Tobias Hallmen, Elisabeth André, Wolfgang Lutz

    Rating scales have shaped psychological research, but are resource-intensive and can burden participants. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a tool to assess latent constructs in text. This study introduces LLM rating scales, which use LLM responses instead of human ratings. We demonstrate this approach with an LLM rating scale measuring patient engagement in therapy transcripts. Automatically transcribed videos of 1,131 sessions from 155 patients were analyzed using DISCOVER, a software framework for local multimodal human behavior analysis. Llama 3.1 8B LLM rated 120 engagement items, averaging the top eight into a total score. Psychometric evaluation showed a normal distribution, strong reliability (ω = 0.953), and acceptable fit (CFI = 0.968, SRMR = 0.022), except RMSEA = 0.108. Validity was supported by significant correlations with engagement determinants (e.g., motivation, r = .413), processes (e.g., between-session efforts, r = .390), and outcomes (e.g., symptoms, r = − .304). Results remained robust across bootstrap resampling and cross-validation, accounting for nested data. The LLM rating scale exhibited strong psychometric properties, demonstrating the potential of the approach as an assessment tool. Importantly, this automated approach uses interpretable items, ensuring clear understanding of measured constructs, while supporting local implementation and protecting confidential data.


  • Feedback Technology for Practice and Research

    by Steffen T. Eberhardt, Antonia Vehlen, Fabienne Mink, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz

  • Open Access

    Development and Validation of Large Language Model Rating Scales for Automatically Transcribed Psychological Therapy Sessions

    by Steffen T. Eberhardt, Antonia Vehlen, Jana Schaffrath, Brian Schwartz, Tobias Baur, Dominik Schiller, Tobias Hallmen, Elisabeth André, Wolfgang Lutz

    Traditional rating scales have shaped psychological research, but are resource-intensive and can burden participants. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a tool to assess latent constructs in text. This study introduces LLM rating scales, a rating method that uses LLM responses instead of human ratings. Its application is demonstrated based on the development and validation of an LLM rating scale measuring patient engagement in transcripts of psychological therapies. Automatically transcribed videos of 1,131 sessions from 155 patients were analyzed using DISCOVER, a software framework for local multimodal human behavior analysis. The Llama 3.1 (8B) LLM rated 120 items on patient engagement, with the top eight items averaged to create a total engagement score ranging from 0 (low) to 100 (high). Psychometric properties were evaluated using the original sample, bootstrap resampling, and test folds. The LLM rating scale demonstrated normal distribution, strong reliability (ω = .953) and acceptable fit (CFI = .968, SRMR = .022), except RMSEA = .108. Validity was supported by significant correlations with engagement determinants (e.g., motivation, r = .413), processes (e.g., between-session efforts, r = .390), and outcomes (e.g., symptoms, r = −.304). Results remained robust across bootstrap and cross-validation analyses accounting for the hierarchical data structure. The LLM rating scale exhibited strong psychometric properties for measuring patient engagement, demonstrating the potential of the LLM rating scale approach as a psychological assessment tool. Importantly, this automated approach uses interpretable items, ensuring clear understanding of measured constructs, while supporting local implementation and protecting confidential data.


  • Open Access

    Depression Symptoms are Associated with Frequency of Cognitive Distortions in Psychotherapy Transcripts

    by Christopher Lalk, Tobias Steinbrenner, Juan S. Pena, Weronika Kania, Jana Schaffrath, Steffen Eberhardt, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel

    Background: Based on previous work on the identification of cognitive distortions in language data, we aim to predict patient depression symptoms by identifying cognitive distortions in their psychotherapy transcripts. Further, using explainable AI we want to create a machine learning model that can be used to identify important distortions, allowing us to assess the most important distortions across the whole dataset and for individual patients. Methods: We identified 14 cognitive distortions by modifying lists of representative n-grams created by Bathina et al. (Nat Hum Behav 5(4):458–466, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01050-7). Based on these n-grams, the relative frequency of the distortions was calculated across 552 transcripts of 124 patients and employed to predict patient depression symptoms. Further, we joined all distortions in an exploratory explainable AI model, combining various machine learning algorithms in a nested cross-validation framework for the prediction of depression symptoms. Results: Depression severity and occurrence were predicted by the distortions personalizing ( $$r=.13)$$ r = . 13 ) , dichotomous thinking ( $$r=.11)$$ r = . 11 ) , and overgeneralizing ( $$r=.10)$$ r = . 10 ) , while occurrence was additionally predicted by mental filtering. The joined machine learning model achieved a moderate performance of $$r=.29$$ r = . 29 . Using explainable AI, we identified the distortions with the highest feature impact in the combined model (i.e., dichotomous reasoning, minimization, personalizing, mindreading, and mental filtering) and were able to explain the prediction for individual transcripts. Conclusions: This approach illustrates how language-based measures can identify relevant processes that predict depression symptoms. This may improve our understanding of the effects of cognitive distortions and may be utilized to create feedback to therapists. Limitations prevail due to small effect sizes and the exploratory approach of this study.


  • Open Access

    From theory to practice: A transtheoretical treatment and training model (4TM)

    by Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer, Jana Schaffrath, Steffen T. Eberhardt, Jana Bommer, Antonia Vehlen, Danilo Moggia, Kaitlyn Poster, Birgit Weinmann-Lutz, et al.

    Background: In this paper, we present the conceptual background and clinical implications of a research-based transtheoretical treatment and training model (4TM). Method: The model implements findings from psychotherapy outcome, process, and feedback research into a clinical and training framework that is open to future research. Results: The framework is based on interventions targeting patient processes on a behavioral, cognitive, emotional, motivational, interpersonal, and systemic/socio-cultural level. The 4TM also includes a data-based decision support and feedback system called the Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN). Conclusion: We discuss important problems associated with clinical orientations solely based on one school of thought. We then contrast these concerns with a clinical and training framework that embraces ongoing research, serving as a guiding structure for process-based transtheoretical interventions. Such research-based psychological therapy can take both traditional and novel clinical developments as well as findings from psychotherapy research into account and be adaptively disseminated to a variety of patient populations.


  • Open Access

    Measuring Alliance and Symptom Severity in Psychotherapy Transcripts Using Bert Topic Modeling

    by Christopher Lalk, Tobias Steinbrenner, Weronika Kania, Alexander Popko, Robin Wester, Jana Schaffrath, Steffen Eberhardt, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel

    We aim to use topic modeling, an approach for discovering clusters of related words (“topics”), to predict symptom severity and therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy transcripts, while also identifying the most important topics and overarching themes for prediction. We analyzed 552 psychotherapy transcripts from 124 patients. Using BERTopic (Grootendorst, 2022), we extracted 250 topics each for patient and therapist speech. These topics were used to predict symptom severity and alliance with various competing machine-learning methods. Sensitivity analyses were calculated for a model based on 50 topics, LDA-based topic modeling, and a bigram model. Additionally, we grouped topics into themes using qualitative analysis and identified key topics and themes with eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Symptom severity could be predicted with highest accuracy by patient topics ( $$r$$ r =0.45, 95%-CI 0.40, 0.51), whereas alliance was better predicted by therapist topics ( $$r$$ r =0.20, 95%-CI 0.16, 0.24). Drivers for symptom severity were themes related to health and negative experiences. Lower alliance was correlated with various themes, especially psychotherapy framework, income, and everyday life. This analysis shows the potential of using topic modeling in psychotherapy research allowing to predict several treatment-relevant metrics with reasonable accuracy. Further, the use of XAI allows for an analysis of the individual predictive value of topics and themes. Limitations entail heterogeneity across different topic modeling hyperparameters and a relatively small sample size.


  • Open Access

    Decoding emotions: Exploring the validity of sentiment analysis in psychotherapy

    by Steffen T. Eberhardt, Jana Schaffrath, Danilo Moggia, Brian Schwartz, Martin Jaehde, Julian A. Rubel, Tobias Baur, Elisabeth André, Wolfgang Lutz

    Given the importance of emotions in psychotherapy, valid measures are essential for research and practice. As emotions are expressed at different levels, multimodal measurements are needed for a nuanced assessment. Natural Language Processing (NLP) could augment the measurement of emotions. The study explores the validity of sentiment analysis in psychotherapy transcripts. We used a transformer-based NLP algorithm to analyze sentiments in 85 transcripts from 35 patients. Construct and criterion validity were evaluated using self- and therapist reports and process and outcome measures via correlational, multitrait-multimethod, and multilevel analyses. The results provide indications in support of the sentiments' validity. For example, sentiments were significantly related to self- and therapist reports of emotions in the same session. Sentiments correlated significantly with in-session processes (e.g., coping experiences), and an increase in positive sentiments throughout therapy predicted better outcomes after treatment termination. Sentiment analysis could serve as a valid approach to assessing the emotional tone of psychotherapy sessions and may contribute to the multimodal measurement of emotions. Future research could combine sentiment analysis with automatic emotion recognition in facial expressions and vocal cues via the Nonverbal Behavior Analyzer (NOVA). Limitations (e.g., exploratory study with numerous tests) and opportunities are discussed.


  • Open Access

    Ein offenes transtheoretisches Therapie- und Trainingsmodell (4TM)

    by Wolfgang Lutz, Brian Schwartz, Anne-Kathrina Deisenhofer, Miriam I. Hehlmann, Steffen T. Eberhardt, Jana Bommer, Antonia Vehlen, Susanne Edelbluth, Kaitlyn Poster, Danilo Moggia, et al.

    Zusammenfassung: Hintergrund: In diesem Beitrag werden die konzeptionellen Grundlagen sowie die klinischen Implikationen eines forschungsbasiertentranstheoretischenTherapie- undTrainingsmodells (4TM) vorgestellt; dieses kann das Fundament für eine zukünftige evidenzbasierte und personalisierte Psychotherapiepraxis sowie Aus- und Weiterbildung in der Psychotherapie darstellen.Ziel der Arbeit: Ableitung und Darstellung eines wissenschaftlich basierten, offenen transtheoretischen Rahmenmodells für die Psychotherapiepraxis sowie Aus- und Weiterbildung in der Psychotherapie.Methode: Das Modell versucht, Erkenntnisse aus der Psychotherapieforschung zu differenziellen Behandlungsergebnissen, der Feedback-Forschung, der Forschung zu Therapeutenunterschieden sowie der Forschung zu Veränderungsprozessen und modernen technischen Entwicklungen in ein offenes konzeptionelles Rahmenmodell für die klinische Praxis und Ausbildung zusammenzuführen.Ergebnisse: Das Modell basiert auf Interventionen, die bei Patient:innen Veränderungsprozesse auf Verhaltens-, kognitiver, emotionaler, motivationsbezogener, zwischenmenschlicher und systemischer/soziokultureller Ebene auslösen. Das 4TM umfasst außerdem ein datenbasiertes Entscheidungs- und Rückmeldesystem namens Trier Therapie Navigator (TTN).Diskussion: Es werden wichtige Probleme einer rein schulenbasierten Ausrichtung der Psychotherapie in Deutschland diskutiert und diese dem offenen Rahmen eines forschungs-, rückmeldungs- und prozessorientierten Konzepts als Leitfaden für transtheoretische Interventionen gegenübergestellt. Dieses Konzept kann eine Orientierung für eine wissenschaftsbasierte Psychotherapie, unter Berücksichtigung traditioneller sowie neuer klinischer Entwicklungen und Erkenntnisse aus der Psychotherapieforschung, bieten. Es kann sowohl an unterschiedliche Patientenpopulationen als auch kultursensitiv angepasst werden.