My Nguyen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
My Nguyen has a total of 21 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Ana Raquel Castro E Costa
WM Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University - New Brunswick, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
1 shared publicationAnagha Kalelkar
WM Keck Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University - New Brunswick, 604 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
1 shared publication- Apoorva Milind Pradhan
Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
1 shared publication - Bela Ganatra
Affiliation UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
1 shared publication - Deborah Constant
University of Cape Town
1 shared publication - Elena M. Vazey
Affiliation Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
- Vol. 64 (6) , 102224
Qualitative evaluation to understand barriers and facilitators to prescribing angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
- 28 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
- Vol. 64 (6) , 102224
Open AccessQualitative evaluation to understand barriers and facilitators to prescribing angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
- 4 December 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Neuropharmacology
- Vol. 245, 109800
A paradigm for ethanol consumption in head-fixed mice during prefrontal cortical two-photon calcium imaging
- 4 December 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Neuropharmacology
- Vol. 245, 109800
A paradigm for ethanol consumption in head-fixed mice during prefrontal cortical two-photon calcium imaging
- Open Access
- 5 January 2016
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (1) , e0146305
Accuracy of Assessment of Eligibility for Early Medical Abortion by Community Health Workers in Ethiopia, India and South Africa
To assess the accuracy of assessment of eligibility for early medical abortion by community health workers using a simple checklist toolkit. Diagnostic accuracy study. Ethiopia, India and South Africa. Two hundred seventeen women in Ethiopia, 258 in India and 236 in South Africa were enrolled into the study. A checklist toolkit to determine eligibility for early medical abortion was validated by comparing results of clinician and community health worker assessment of eligibility using the checklist toolkit with the reference standard exam. Accuracy was over 90% and the negative likelihood ratio <0.1 at all three sites when used by clinician assessors. Positive likelihood ratios were 4.3 in Ethiopia, 5.8 in India and 6.3 in South Africa. When used by community health workers the overall accuracy of the toolkit was 92% in Ethiopia, 80% in India and 77% in South Africa negative likelihood ratios were 0.08 in Ethiopia, 0.25 in India and 0.22 in South Africa and positive likelihood ratios were 5.9 in Ethiopia and 2.0 in India and South Africa. The checklist toolkit, as used by clinicians, was excellent at ruling out participants who were not eligible, and moderately effective at ruling in participants who were eligible for medical abortion. Results were promising when used by community health workers particularly in Ethiopia where they had more prior experience with use of diagnostic aids and longer professional training. The checklist toolkit assessments resulted in some participants being wrongly assessed as eligible for medical abortion which is an area of concern. Further research is needed to streamline the components of the tool, explore optimal duration and content of training for community health workers, and test feasibility and acceptability.
- 5 January 2016
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (1) , e0146305
Open AccessAccuracy of Assessment of Eligibility for Early Medical Abortion by Community Health Workers in Ethiopia, India and South Africa
To assess the accuracy of assessment of eligibility for early medical abortion by community health workers using a simple checklist toolkit. Diagnostic accuracy study. Ethiopia, India and South Africa. Two hundred seventeen women in Ethiopia, 258 in India and 236 in South Africa were enrolled into the study. A checklist toolkit to determine eligibility for early medical abortion was validated by comparing results of clinician and community health worker assessment of eligibility using the checklist toolkit with the reference standard exam. Accuracy was over 90% and the negative likelihood ratio <0.1 at all three sites when used by clinician assessors. Positive likelihood ratios were 4.3 in Ethiopia, 5.8 in India and 6.3 in South Africa. When used by community health workers the overall accuracy of the toolkit was 92% in Ethiopia, 80% in India and 77% in South Africa negative likelihood ratios were 0.08 in Ethiopia, 0.25 in India and 0.22 in South Africa and positive likelihood ratios were 5.9 in Ethiopia and 2.0 in India and South Africa. The checklist toolkit, as used by clinicians, was excellent at ruling out participants who were not eligible, and moderately effective at ruling in participants who were eligible for medical abortion. Results were promising when used by community health workers particularly in Ethiopia where they had more prior experience with use of diagnostic aids and longer professional training. The checklist toolkit assessments resulted in some participants being wrongly assessed as eligible for medical abortion which is an area of concern. Further research is needed to streamline the components of the tool, explore optimal duration and content of training for community health workers, and test feasibility and acceptability.