Hassan Nasseredine
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Hassan Nasseredine has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Suzan Dsouza
College of Business Administration American University of Middle East Egaila Kuwait
4 shared publications - Houshang Habibniya
College of Business Administration, American University of the Middle East, Egaila 15453, Kuwait
2 shared publications - Dina Sabry Said
American University of Middle East
1 shared publication - Dragan Pamucar
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
1 shared publication - Elsa Abboud
American University of the Middle East
1 shared publication Harish Garg
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 November 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Vol. 10 (11) , 376
Digital Governance as a Strategic Engine for Reaping Financial Performance: Evidence from the Global Healthcare Segment
Digital government initiatives have become a central feature of contemporary governance, reshaping institutional environments and influencing firm behavior across industries, including the global healthcare sector. The study empirically examines the effects of e-government development on healthcare firms’ performance across countries, with liquidity serving as a mediating variable. Grounded in institutional theory, transaction cost economics, and the resource-based view, the analysis assesses how variations in digital governance environments influence firm-level financial performance. Using an unbalanced panel of 14,942 firm-year observations from healthcare firms across 74 countries over the period 2016–2024, the study employs fixed-effects panel regressions to assess the effects of the E-Government Rank, E-Government Index, and E-Participation Index on return on assets. The findings reveal that e-government development exerts heterogeneous effects on firm performance. Higher numerical E-Government Rank (EGR) values are positively associated with firm profitability but negatively associated with liquidity, indicating that a deterioration in relative digital-governance standing corresponds to higher profitability and lower liquidity. Conversely, higher e-government index scores enhance liquidity, which in turn improves performance, suggesting a potential liquidity-mediated relationship. E-participation shows no direct performance impact, though liquidity remains a critical channel, particularly for smaller firms. Overall, the results highlight liquidity as a key transmission mechanism through which digital governance influences healthcare firm performance. The study offers important implications for policymakers and managers seeking to leverage digital governance reforms for sustainable healthcare sector development.
- 4 November 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Vol. 10 (11) , 376
Open AccessDigital Governance as a Strategic Engine for Reaping Financial Performance: Evidence from the Global Healthcare Segment
Digital government initiatives have become a central feature of contemporary governance, reshaping institutional environments and influencing firm behavior across industries, including the global healthcare sector. The study empirically examines the effects of e-government development on healthcare firms’ performance across countries, with liquidity serving as a mediating variable. Grounded in institutional theory, transaction cost economics, and the resource-based view, the analysis assesses how variations in digital governance environments influence firm-level financial performance. Using an unbalanced panel of 14,942 firm-year observations from healthcare firms across 74 countries over the period 2016–2024, the study employs fixed-effects panel regressions to assess the effects of the E-Government Rank, E-Government Index, and E-Participation Index on return on assets. The findings reveal that e-government development exerts heterogeneous effects on firm performance. Higher numerical E-Government Rank (EGR) values are positively associated with firm profitability but negatively associated with liquidity, indicating that a deterioration in relative digital-governance standing corresponds to higher profitability and lower liquidity. Conversely, higher e-government index scores enhance liquidity, which in turn improves performance, suggesting a potential liquidity-mediated relationship. E-participation shows no direct performance impact, though liquidity remains a critical channel, particularly for smaller firms. Overall, the results highlight liquidity as a key transmission mechanism through which digital governance influences healthcare firm performance. The study offers important implications for policymakers and managers seeking to leverage digital governance reforms for sustainable healthcare sector development.
- Open Access
- 14 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Social Sciences & Humanities Open
- Vol. 12
Comparative analysis of intellectual capital models: Enhancing financial performance and market value in S&P 500 firms
- 14 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Social Sciences & Humanities Open
- Vol. 12
Open AccessComparative analysis of intellectual capital models: Enhancing financial performance and market value in S&P 500 firms
- Open Access
- 4 March 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cogent Social Sciences
- Vol. 11 (1)
Do firm-level variables impact dividend pay-out? Examining application of two-step system GMM panel model
- 4 March 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cogent Social Sciences
- Vol. 11 (1)
Open AccessDo firm-level variables impact dividend pay-out? Examining application of two-step system GMM panel model
- Open Access
- 11 December 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cogent Social Sciences
- Vol. 10 (1)
Variables that sway the capital structure! Evidence from the US automotive industry
- 11 December 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cogent Social Sciences
- Vol. 10 (1)
Open AccessVariables that sway the capital structure! Evidence from the US automotive industry