Klara Stokes
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Klara Stokes has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Dimitri Leemans
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
4 shared publications - Philippe Tranchida
Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
3 shared publications - Lars-Daniel Öhman
Umeå Universitet
1 shared publication - Rakhi Pratihar
École Polytechnique Inria & Laboratoire LIX UMR 7161 CNRS Institut Polytechnique de Paris 1 rue Honoré d'Estienne d'Orves 91120 Palaiseau Cedex
1 shared publication - Signe Lundqvist
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
1 shared publication - Tovohery Hajatiana Randrianarisoa
Department of Mathematical Sciences Florida Atlantic University
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Groups represented by incidence geometries
The aim of this paper is to use the framework of incidence geometry to develop a theory that permits to model both the inner and outer automorphisms of a group G simultaneously. More precisely, to any group G, we attempt to associate an incidence system whose group of type-preserving automorphisms is Inn(G), the group of inner automorphisms of G, and whose full group of automorphisms is the group Out(G) of outer automorphisms of G, getting what we call an incidence geometric representation theory for groups. Hence, in this setting, the group Inn(G) preserves the types of the associated incidence structure while the group Out(G) is acting non-trivially on the typeset of it, realizing the outer automorphisms of G as correlations. We give examples of incidence geometric representations for the dihedral groups, the symmetric groups, the automorphism groups of the five platonic solids, families of classical groups defined over fields such as the projective linear groups, and finally subgroups of free groups whose outer automorphism group is the largest finite subgroup of their automorphism group.
Open AccessGroups represented by incidence geometries
The aim of this paper is to use the framework of incidence geometry to develop a theory that permits to model both the inner and outer automorphisms of a group G simultaneously. More precisely, to any group G, we attempt to associate an incidence system whose group of type-preserving automorphisms is Inn(G), the group of inner automorphisms of G, and whose full group of automorphisms is the group Out(G) of outer automorphisms of G, getting what we call an incidence geometric representation theory for groups. Hence, in this setting, the group Inn(G) preserves the types of the associated incidence structure while the group Out(G) is acting non-trivially on the typeset of it, realizing the outer automorphisms of G as correlations. We give examples of incidence geometric representations for the dihedral groups, the symmetric groups, the automorphism groups of the five platonic solids, families of classical groups defined over fields such as the projective linear groups, and finally subgroups of free groups whose outer automorphism group is the largest finite subgroup of their automorphism group.
- Open Access
A lattice framework for generalizing shellable complexes and matroids
We introduce the notion of power lattices that unifies and extends the equicardinal geometric lattices, Cartesian products of subspace lattices, and multiset subset lattices, among several others. The notions of shellability for simplicial complexes, q-complexes, and multicomplexes are then unified and extended to that of complexes in power lattices, which we name as P-complexes. A nontrivial class of shellable P-complexes are obtained via P-complexes of the independent sets of a matroid in power lattice, which we introduce to generalize matroids in Boolean lattices, q-matroids in subspace lattices, and sum-matroids in Cartesian products of subspace lattices. We also prove that shellable P-complexes in a power lattice yield shellable order complexes, extending the celebrated result of shellability of order complexes of (equicardinal) geometric lattices by Björner and also, a recent result on shellability of order complexes of lexicographically shellable q-complexes. Finally, we provide a construction of matroids on the lattice of multiset subsets from weighted graphs. We also consider a variation of Stanley-Reisner rings associated with shellable multicomplexes than the one considered by Herzog and Popescu and proved that these rings are sequentially Cohen-Macaulay.
Open AccessA lattice framework for generalizing shellable complexes and matroids
We introduce the notion of power lattices that unifies and extends the equicardinal geometric lattices, Cartesian products of subspace lattices, and multiset subset lattices, among several others. The notions of shellability for simplicial complexes, q-complexes, and multicomplexes are then unified and extended to that of complexes in power lattices, which we name as P-complexes. A nontrivial class of shellable P-complexes are obtained via P-complexes of the independent sets of a matroid in power lattice, which we introduce to generalize matroids in Boolean lattices, q-matroids in subspace lattices, and sum-matroids in Cartesian products of subspace lattices. We also prove that shellable P-complexes in a power lattice yield shellable order complexes, extending the celebrated result of shellability of order complexes of (equicardinal) geometric lattices by Björner and also, a recent result on shellability of order complexes of lexicographically shellable q-complexes. Finally, we provide a construction of matroids on the lattice of multiset subsets from weighted graphs. We also consider a variation of Stanley-Reisner rings associated with shellable multicomplexes than the one considered by Herzog and Popescu and proved that these rings are sequentially Cohen-Macaulay.
- Open Access
- 19 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Discrete & Computational Geometry
- Vol. 73 (1) , 25-48
When is a Planar Rod Configuration Infinitesimally Rigid?
We investigate the rigidity properties of rod configurations. Rod configurations are realizations of rank two incidence geometries as points (joints) and straight lines (rods) in the Euclidean plane, such that the lines move as rigid bodies, connected at the points. Note that not all incidence geometries have such realizations. We show that under the assumptions that the rod configuration exists and is sufficiently generic, its infinitesimal rigidity is equivalent to the infinitesimal rigidity of generic frameworks of the graph defined by replacing each rod by a cone over its point set. To put this into context, the molecular conjecture states that the infinitesimal rigidity of rod configurations realizing 2-regular hypergraphs is determined by the rigidity of generic body and hinge frameworks realizing the same hypergraph. This conjecture was proven by Jackson and Jordán in the plane, and by Katoh and Tanigawa in arbitrary dimension. Whiteley proved a version of the molecular conjecture for hypergraphs of arbitrary degree that have realizations as independent body and joint frameworks. Our result extends his result to hypergraphs that do not necessarily have realizations as independent body and joint frameworks, under the assumptions listed above.
- 19 December 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Discrete & Computational Geometry
- Vol. 73 (1) , 25-48
Open AccessWhen is a Planar Rod Configuration Infinitesimally Rigid?
We investigate the rigidity properties of rod configurations. Rod configurations are realizations of rank two incidence geometries as points (joints) and straight lines (rods) in the Euclidean plane, such that the lines move as rigid bodies, connected at the points. Note that not all incidence geometries have such realizations. We show that under the assumptions that the rod configuration exists and is sufficiently generic, its infinitesimal rigidity is equivalent to the infinitesimal rigidity of generic frameworks of the graph defined by replacing each rod by a cone over its point set. To put this into context, the molecular conjecture states that the infinitesimal rigidity of rod configurations realizing 2-regular hypergraphs is determined by the rigidity of generic body and hinge frameworks realizing the same hypergraph. This conjecture was proven by Jackson and Jordán in the plane, and by Katoh and Tanigawa in arbitrary dimension. Whiteley proved a version of the molecular conjecture for hypergraphs of arbitrary degree that have realizations as independent body and joint frameworks. Our result extends his result to hypergraphs that do not necessarily have realizations as independent body and joint frameworks, under the assumptions listed above.
- Open Access
Flag transitive geometries with trialities and no dualities coming from Suzuki groups
Recently, Leemans and Stokes constructed an infinite family of incidence geometries admitting trialities but no dualities from the groups PSL(2,q) (where $q=p^{3n}$ with $p$ a prime and $n>0$ a positive integer). Unfortunately these geometries are not flag transitive. In this paper, we construct the first infinite family of incidence geometries of rank three that are flag transitive and have trialities but no dualities. These geometries are constructed using chamber systems of Suzuki groups Sz(q) (where $q=2^{2e+1}$ with $e$ a positive integer and $2e+1$ is divisible by 3) and the trialities come from field automorphisms. We also construct an infinite family of regular hypermaps with automorphism group Sz(q) that admit trialities but no dualities.Open AccessFlag transitive geometries with trialities and no dualities coming from Suzuki groups
Recently, Leemans and Stokes constructed an infinite family of incidence geometries admitting trialities but no dualities from the groups PSL(2,q) (where $q=p^{3n}$ with $p$ a prime and $n>0$ a positive integer). Unfortunately these geometries are not flag transitive. In this paper, we construct the first infinite family of incidence geometries of rank three that are flag transitive and have trialities but no dualities. These geometries are constructed using chamber systems of Suzuki groups Sz(q) (where $q=2^{2e+1}$ with $e$ a positive integer and $2e+1$ is divisible by 3) and the trialities come from field automorphisms. We also construct an infinite family of regular hypermaps with automorphism group Sz(q) that admit trialities but no dualities. - Open Access
On trialities and their absolute geometries
We introduce the notion of moving absolute geometry of a geometry with triality and show that, in the classical case where the triality is of type $(I_σ)$ and the absolute geometry is a generalized hexagon, the moving absolute geometry also gives interesting flag-transitive geometries with Buekenhout diagram with parameters $(d_p, g, d_L) = (5, 3, 6)$ for the groups $G_2(k)$ and $^3D_4(k)$, for any integer $k \geq 2$. We also classify the classical absolute geometries for geometries with trialities but no dualities coming from maps of Class III with automorphism group $L_2(q^3)$, where $q$ is a power of a prime. We then investigate the moving absolute geometries for these geometries, illustrating their interest in this case.Open AccessOn trialities and their absolute geometries
We introduce the notion of moving absolute geometry of a geometry with triality and show that, in the classical case where the triality is of type $(I_σ)$ and the absolute geometry is a generalized hexagon, the moving absolute geometry also gives interesting flag-transitive geometries with Buekenhout diagram with parameters $(d_p, g, d_L) = (5, 3, 6)$ for the groups $G_2(k)$ and $^3D_4(k)$, for any integer $k \geq 2$. We also classify the classical absolute geometries for geometries with trialities but no dualities coming from maps of Class III with automorphism group $L_2(q^3)$, where $q$ is a power of a prime. We then investigate the moving absolute geometries for these geometries, illustrating their interest in this case. - Open Access
Incidence geometries with trialities coming from maps with Wilson trialities
Triality is a classical notion in geometry that arose in the context of the Lie groups of type $D_4$. Another notion of triality, Wilson triality, appears in the context of reflexible maps. We build a bridge between these two notions, showing how to construct an incidence geometry with a triality from a map that admits a Wilson triality. We also extend a result by Jones and Poulton, showing that for every prime power $q$, the group ${\rm L}_2(q^3)$ has maps that admit Wilson trialities but no dualities.Open AccessIncidence geometries with trialities coming from maps with Wilson trialities
Triality is a classical notion in geometry that arose in the context of the Lie groups of type $D_4$. Another notion of triality, Wilson triality, appears in the context of reflexible maps. We build a bridge between these two notions, showing how to construct an incidence geometry with a triality from a map that admits a Wilson triality. We also extend a result by Jones and Poulton, showing that for every prime power $q$, the group ${\rm L}_2(q^3)$ has maps that admit Wilson trialities but no dualities.