Seitaro Oda

Purpose: To investigate whether virtual-monoenergetic images (VMI) from dual-layer spectral-detector computed tomography (DLCT) improve right adrenal vein (RAV) assessment before adrenal venous sampling (AVS), and portal-venous-phase (PVP) images alone can replace conventional multiphase CT combining late-arterial phase (LAP) and PVP. Methods: Sixty-three patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent LAP and PVP DLCT before AVS were retrospectively analyzed. Conventional polyenergetic-images (PEI) and VMI at 40–70 keV (VMI _40–70 ) were reconstructed. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of RAV were quantified. VMI with the highest CNR was predefined as the best-VMI. Two radiologists evaluated four image series (PEI and best-VMI at LAP and PVP) separately for RAV visibility, accessory hepatic vein (AHV) assessability, and image noise using five-point scales (1 = worst, 5 = best). RAV detection and AHV assessability rates were compared among image series. Results: In both enhancement phases, VMI _40–70 showed lower image noise and VMI _40–60 higher CNR than PEI (all p < 0.05), with VMI ₄₀ providing the highest CNR and being designated as the best VMI. Compared to PEI at LAP, CNR was lower with PEI at PVP but higher with VMI ₄₀ at PVP (both, p < 0.001). In subjective analysis, VMI ₄₀ showed better scores than PEI for image noise (LAP: 4.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6; PVP: 4.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5) and RAV visibility (LAP: 4.5 ± 0.8 vs. 3.5 ± 0.8; PVP: 3.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.6 ± 0.9) (all p < 0.001). With PEI, the RAV detection rate was lower at PVP than at LAP (54.8% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.001). Use of VMI ₄₀ at PVP achieved the same detection rate as PEI at LAP (89.7%, p = 1.0) and higher AHV assessability rate than PEI at PVP (96.8% vs. 80.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: DLCT-VMI improved RAV assessments before AVS. Using VMI ₄₀ for PVP provided RAV depiction equivalent to PEI at LAP and superior AHV assessability to PEI at PVP, suggesting its potential as a surrogate for dedicated multiphase CT.

We aimed to assess the additive value of the split-bolus single-phase computed tomography (CT) scan protocol to preoperatively assess patients with lung cancer, who were referred for video-assisted thoracic surgery, when compared to a standard staging CT protocol. We included 160 patients with lung cancer who underwent a split-bolus single-phase CT scan protocol (split-bolus protocol), which can acquire whole-body staging CT and pulmonary artery-vein separation CT angiography (PA–PV CTA) in a single acquisition and 160 patients who underwent whole-body staging CT (standard protocol). We compared the quality of the staging CT images of hepatic parenchyma, portal vein, and hepatic vein between both protocols. We also investigated image quality on PA–PV CTA images in the split-bolus protocol and recorded the number of patients that underwent the 3D PA–PV CTA imaging process. The split-bolus protocol for staging CT images demonstrated a slightly higher enhancement with regard to the hepatic parenchyma (p = 0.007) and hepatic vein (p = 0.006) than the standard protocol. There was no significant difference in the quality of the staging CT images between both protocols (p = 0.067). The mean CT number for the main pulmonary artery and the left atrium for the PA–PV CTA images in the split-bolus protocol were 289.1 HU and 172.8 HU, respectively. Among the images associated with the split-bolus protocol, 98.1% were of appropriate quality for 3D PA–PV CTA imaging. The split-bolus protocol is a dose-efficient protocol to acquire the staging CT and PA–PV CTA images in a single session and provides sufficient image quality for preoperative assessment in patients with lung cancer.

The influence of newer-generation CT on the clinical indications and appropriateness of cardiac CT has not been adequately surveyed. We aimed to evaluate the distribution of appropriateness ratings and test the outcomes of cardiac CT using second-generation 320-row CT. The 2010 appropriate use criteria (AUC) were applied at the point of service to a consecutive series of patients (N = 309) who were referred for cardiac CT. The CT indication was determined based on interviews and medical records. The proportions of patients within the categories of appropriate (A), uncertain (U), inappropriate (I), and not covered were described. The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was also compared among the categories. The proportions were 49.2%, 25.9%, and 20.7% for appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate indication, respectively. The indication that was not covered was only 4.2%. Significant CAD was more frequently observed for uncertain- than appropriate indication (42.5% vs 27.6%; P = 0.03), although the number of significant stenosed segments was not different (P = 0.13). The recent advancement of cardiac CT increased the proportion of uncertain scans, which were associated with a high prevalence of significant CAD.