AHAdam L. Holland

Adam L. Holland

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Adam L. Holland has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Designing Inclusive Computational Thinking Learning Trajectories for the Youngest Learners

    by Shannon Stark Guss, Douglas H. Clements, Elica Sharifnia, Julie Sarama, Adam Holland, Chih-Ing Lim, Megan Vinh

    Foundational thinking for later use of technology, particularly coding, is necessary for an inclusive and sustainable future. Inclusive practices beginning in early childhood recognize children’s innate development of computational thinking—sequencing, repetition and looping, debugging, decomposing and composing, representation, and causality. This qualitative research describes processes of developing and evaluating hypothesized developmental progressions. Inclusive engagement of children with and without disabilities is described in examples for each level of each developmental progression. Implications for teaching and learning with inclusive practices are described for children with and without disabilities.


  • Open Access

    Building Learning Trajectories for Intentional, Inclusive, and Individualized Instructional Experiences in STEM

    by Shannon Stark Guss, Chih-Ing Lim, Douglas H. Clements, Elica B. Sharifnia, Adam L. Holland, Megan Vinh, Julie Sarama

    Early science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) learning experiences often exclude children with disabilities and intersecting identities. To promote learning in STEM for all children, the Curriculum Research Framework (CRF) was applied to build learning trajectories of STEM for children from birth to age 5. The CRF was extended and enhanced to generate explicitly inclusive learning trajectories for children with and without disabilities. The process of generating a priori foundations, building learning trajectories, and testing the results in inclusive settings led to new resources for early childhood education (ECE) and early childhood special education (ECSE) practitioners and generated implications for creating and evaluating learning trajectories in ways that affirm that all children belong in STEM. Challenges faced and lessons learned in this process are presented to guide future research and development using the revised and enhanced CRF.