Adam L. Holland
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Adam L. Holland has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chih-Ing Lim
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
2 shared publications - Douglas H. Clements
University of Denver, Denver, USA
2 shared publications - Elica Sharifnia
Marsico Institute for Early Learning, University of Denver, Denver, USA
2 shared publications - Julie Sarama
Marsico Institute for Early Learning, University of Denver, 1999 E. Evans Ave., Denver, CO 80208, USA
2 shared publications - Megan Vinh
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 910 Raleigh Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
2 shared publications - Shannon Stark Guss
Marsico Institute for Early Learning, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 July 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 14 (7) , 733
Designing Inclusive Computational Thinking Learning Trajectories for the Youngest Learners
Foundational thinking for later use of technology, particularly coding, is necessary for an inclusive and sustainable future. Inclusive practices beginning in early childhood recognize children’s innate development of computational thinking—sequencing, repetition and looping, debugging, decomposing and composing, representation, and causality. This qualitative research describes processes of developing and evaluating hypothesized developmental progressions. Inclusive engagement of children with and without disabilities is described in examples for each level of each developmental progression. Implications for teaching and learning with inclusive practices are described for children with and without disabilities.
- 4 July 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 14 (7) , 733
Open AccessDesigning Inclusive Computational Thinking Learning Trajectories for the Youngest Learners
Foundational thinking for later use of technology, particularly coding, is necessary for an inclusive and sustainable future. Inclusive practices beginning in early childhood recognize children’s innate development of computational thinking—sequencing, repetition and looping, debugging, decomposing and composing, representation, and causality. This qualitative research describes processes of developing and evaluating hypothesized developmental progressions. Inclusive engagement of children with and without disabilities is described in examples for each level of each developmental progression. Implications for teaching and learning with inclusive practices are described for children with and without disabilities.
- Open Access
- 21 December 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 14 (1) , 8
Building Learning Trajectories for Intentional, Inclusive, and Individualized Instructional Experiences in STEM
Early science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) learning experiences often exclude children with disabilities and intersecting identities. To promote learning in STEM for all children, the Curriculum Research Framework (CRF) was applied to build learning trajectories of STEM for children from birth to age 5. The CRF was extended and enhanced to generate explicitly inclusive learning trajectories for children with and without disabilities. The process of generating a priori foundations, building learning trajectories, and testing the results in inclusive settings led to new resources for early childhood education (ECE) and early childhood special education (ECSE) practitioners and generated implications for creating and evaluating learning trajectories in ways that affirm that all children belong in STEM. Challenges faced and lessons learned in this process are presented to guide future research and development using the revised and enhanced CRF.
- 21 December 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Education Sciences
- Vol. 14 (1) , 8
Open AccessBuilding Learning Trajectories for Intentional, Inclusive, and Individualized Instructional Experiences in STEM
Early science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) learning experiences often exclude children with disabilities and intersecting identities. To promote learning in STEM for all children, the Curriculum Research Framework (CRF) was applied to build learning trajectories of STEM for children from birth to age 5. The CRF was extended and enhanced to generate explicitly inclusive learning trajectories for children with and without disabilities. The process of generating a priori foundations, building learning trajectories, and testing the results in inclusive settings led to new resources for early childhood education (ECE) and early childhood special education (ECSE) practitioners and generated implications for creating and evaluating learning trajectories in ways that affirm that all children belong in STEM. Challenges faced and lessons learned in this process are presented to guide future research and development using the revised and enhanced CRF.