Milena Siqueira Pereira

Background: Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) has been established as an etiological agent in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), yet its role in other cutaneous neoplasms remains under investigation. The impact of the host’s immunogenetic characteristics on the persistence of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) in non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is not yet well understood. Objective: Our aim was to investigate the presence of MCPyV in various skin lesions, particularly NMSC, and its association with cytokine gene polymorphisms related to immune regulation. Methods: We analyzed 274 skin biopsies (lesional, perilesional, and healthy skin) from 84 patients undergoing dermatological evaluation. MCPyV DNA and polymorphisms in IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α genes were detected using PCR-based assays. Results: MCPyV was significantly more prevalent in NMSC and non-cancerous lesions than in surgical margins or healthy skin (p = 0.050 and 0.048, respectively). Concordance between lesion and margin samples was low (κ = 0.305), suggesting microenvironment-specific viral persistence. Notably, high-expression IL-10 genotypes (-1082 GG) and low-expression IL-6 genotypes (-174 AA) were significantly associated with MCPyV detection (p = 0.048 and p = 0.015, respectively). Conclusions: MCPyV preferentially localizes to NMSC lesions, particularly in individuals with immunogenetic profiles favoring viral persistence. Since the role of MCPyV in the pathogenesis of NMSC remains uncertain, our results highlight the need for further studies to clarify whether the lesion’s microenvironment supports viral persistence or indicates a more intricate interaction between the virus and the host, which could be significant for the development of skin cancer.

Background: Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) has been established as an etiological agent in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), yet its role in other cutaneous neoplasms re-mains under investigation. In the context of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), the influence of host immunogenetics on MCPyV persistence is poorly understood. Objec-tive: To investigate the presence of MCPyV in various skin lesions, particularly NMSC, and its association with cytokine gene polymorphisms related to immune regulation. Methods: We analyzed 274 skin biopsies (lesional, perilesional, and healthy skin) from 84 patients undergoing dermatological evaluation. MCPyV DNA and polymorphisms in IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α genes were detected using PCR-based assays. Results: MCPyV was significantly more prevalent in NMSC and non-malignant lesions than in surgical margins or healthy skin (p = 0.050 and 0.048, respectively). Concordance be-tween lesion and margin samples was low (κ = 0.305), suggesting microenviron-ment-specific viral persistence. Notably, high-expression IL-10 genotypes (-1082GG) and low-expression IL-6 genotypes (-174AA) were significantly associated with MCPyV detection (p = 0.048 and p = 0.015, respectively). Conclusion: MCPyV prefer-entially localizes to NMSC lesions, particularly in individuals with immunogenetic profiles favoring viral persistence. Given the unclear role of MCPyV in NMSC patho-genesis, our findings call for comprehensive studies to determine whether the lesional environment facilitates viral persistence or reflects a more complex viral–host interac-tion with potential implications in cutaneous oncogenesis.

Introduction: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infections are of significant concern in men, given its potential impact on their health and the risk of transmission to partners. Understanding and addressing this infection in men is crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination in reducing HPV-related diseases. Objective: To assess the impact of HPV vaccination, potential genotype shifts, and adverse effects, through a prospective study conducted with male university students. Methods:The study involved 286 volunteers who were examined at Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics at the Universidade Federal Fluminense in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The HPV prevalence was evaluated using generic PCR, genotyped by DNA microarray and monitored adverse effects. Results: The findings of this study revealed the absence of moderate or severe adverse effects. Genetic shifts were observed, including the disappearance of oncogenic HPV types 16 and 18. Surprisingly, even after completing the full vaccine regimen, students still harbored HPV11 in the oral tract. Furthermore, persistent HPV 6 and 11 infections were identified in three students, who had pre-existing infections prior to vaccination, at the follow-up visit. Multivariate analysis uncovered independent associations, notably an increased risk of HPV infection in the oral tract among men who have sex with men. HPV prevalence rates remained low both before and after the vaccination scheme (T0: 14.7%, T1: 8.7%). Even after the full vaccination scheme, the prevalence remained similar at T2 (14.6%), with no statistically significant differences recorded. HPV11 emerged as the most prevalent type throughout the study, followed by HPV6. Vaccine genotypes were detected in a significant proportion of samples at T0 (85.4%), T1 (89.5%), and T2 (100%). Conclusion: Overall, this study suggests that vaccination may represent a promising approach to reducing HPV-related health risks. These findings shed light on the potential benefits and challenges of HPV vaccination, emphasizing the need for continued monitoring and vaccination efforts.