Magnus de Witt

Arctic coastal communities face persistent energy-security challenges due to dependence on fossil fuels, high energy costs, vulnerable supply chains, and climate-related changes. This paper examines energy security for Arctic coastal communities in the context of climate change, emphasizing the importance of local energy resilience. It examines how diversification of energy resources affects long-term energy security in the North Slope and Northwest Arctic Boroughs of Alaska, USA. A scoping review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted to address energy security, climate impacts, and renewable energy in Alaska and the Arctic. These studies were selected from Scopus and ScienceDirect and were published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 230 records were screened, and 54 studies met the inclusion criteria. Evidence was thematically charted and synthesized, followed by four community case studies: Utqiaġvik, Kaktovik, Kotzebue, and Deering, based on a literature review and supported by energy model analysis, which reveals that local renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and tidal, reduce fuel dependency and stabilize energy costs amid rising primary energy prices. While climate change poses risks to traditional supply chains, local energy sources can help improve resilience against its impacts and logistical disruptions. The results indicate that the success of the energy transition does not entirely rely on technological adaptation and that it is essential to include local societies to utilize their knowledge and employ adaptive governance and strategic reinvestment of revenues. Marine energy potential showed no significant change over the modeled period, although technological and economic feasibility under Arctic conditions remains uncertain. Overall, diversified and local energy systems are crucial for achieving community resilience and long-term energy security in Arctic coastal communities.

The transition toward sustainable energy in Arctic and subarctic regions requires innovative approaches that account for both the unique geographical conditions and the economic and policy challenges associated with isolated power systems. This study examines how net energy metering (NEM) and net billing schemes influence distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) adoption and financial performance among utilities in Alaska’s Railbelt. The Railbelt, which supplies power to three-quarters of the state’s population, remains heavily reliant on natural gas and exhibits limited renewable penetration compared to other arctic regions. Using a stochastic risk-based modeling framework with Monte Carlo simulations and the Bass diffusion model, the analysis estimates the 15-year financial impacts of different NEM adoption scenarios on utilities. Results show that while NEM drives PV adoption through higher compensation for exported generation, it also increases potential revenue losses for utilities compared to net billing. Policy innovations like those introduced in Alaska’s House Bill 164 (HB 164), which establishes a reimbursement fund to mitigate utility revenue losses, indicate that regulatory work is being designed to balance distributed generation incentives with economic sustainability. This work provides a baseline for understanding how a policy framework influences both utility and consumer economics in terms of NEM and solar PV adoption in Arctic and subarctic systems.

This systematic review evaluates life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from geothermal electricity generation, with a focus on hydrothermal flash, hydrothermal binary, and enhanced geothermal systems. By screening 169 studies published since 2017, 24 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed alongside Pre-2017 benchmarks. Results indicate median life cycle emissions of 43 g CO2 eq/kWh for hydrothermal flash, 36 g CO2 eq/kWh for enhanced geothermal, and 30 g CO2 eq/kWh for hydrothermal binary. Compared with fossil fuels, these values remain substantially lower, underscoring the role of geothermal in low-carbon energy transitions. Evidence suggests that emissions are declining during the construction phase due to advances in drilling efficiency and modular plant design, while operational emissions remain stable, reflecting the limited deployment of carbon capture. End-of-life recycling varies between technologies. These findings highlight geothermal energy’s capacity to support resilient, circular, and sustainable power systems.

The Arctic is warming three to four times faster than the global average. This is transforming global maritime routes, thereby increasing shipping and resource extraction in Alaska. This surge requires sustainable energy solutions as policy trends towards stricter emissions standards. This article assesses the potential of Geothermal-to-X (GtX) technologies in establishing clean refueling infrastructure across Alaska, using its untapped geothermal resources. GtX uses electrolysis to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, a process powered by geothermal energy. Hydrogen and its X products, such as green methane or green ammonia, can be stored as fuels and are largely recognized as the key to a carbon-free future to address the growing energy demand. This study assesses the technical, economic, strategic, and geological feasibility of GtX refueling hubs in Alaska. Five locations were denoted as potential candidates and beckon future research. This study concludes that Unalaska is the most viable initial GtX hub given the highest Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) score from its combination of a high-quality geothermal resource, an existing and accessible deepwater port, and a sizable local energy demand. The goal of this study is to provide an accessible and comprehensive resource for stakeholders and policymakers, outlining an energy future with sustainable maritime development, powered by affordable and secure energy.

Fossil fuels are the most common energy source for electricity generation among remote Arctic communities. Around 80% of remote Arctic communities are predominantly dependent on fossil fuels. Even if some of the region's raw oil is extracted, the processed diesel must be imported. Transport is complicated and strongly dependent on weather conditions. The harsh Arctic weather conditions make fuel transportation is complex, risky, and costly, leading to an insecure primary energy supply and high fuel prices. For many inhabitants of remote Arctic communities, the high energy costs are a significant cost burden because unemployment, temporary jobs, and a resulting low income are common issues.This presentation will focus on implementation strategies for renewable energy sources into the energy mix or remote Arctic communities, with the aim of lowering the energy cost burden. System dynamics (SD) was used as a methodology to analyze the implementation process. SD is a powerful tool to analyse complex systems with non-linear relationships, as it is expected to find them among the policy strategies for energy transition. Investing in renewable energy technology is a high-risk investment; therefore, the effects of such an investment must be well studied to gain an optimal result. Furthermore, remote communities are often facing financial issues, which limits investments in energy infrastructure. Therefore, the model is looking for affordable ways of investing in energy infrastructure. The model aims for a sustainable performance of the utility provider, whereas the electricity cost for the consumer can be lowered and the utility provider can perform well on a non-profit base.The research indicates that renewables have a significant cost-saving potential. Despite all the positive effects, investment in renewables can be risky and a substantial commitment for small communities. Moreover, depending on the type of renewable energy source, there can be some environmental impact that must be considered as well. With a well-structured integration process, the most can be made out of the investment, which helps lower the energy cost burden even more.

This paper presents an overview of current electricity generation and consumption patterns in the Antarctic. Based on both previously published and newly collected data, the paper describes the current status of renewable-energy use at research stations in the Antarctic. A more detailed view of electricity systems is also presented, demonstrating how different types of resources may be used and combined. The paper will serve as a guide to various renewable-energy generation technologies, highlighting well-established praxis, lessons learned, and potential ideas for improvement. Several renewable electricity generation technologies that have proven effective for use in the Antarctic environment are described. as well as those that are currently in use. Finally, the paper summarizes the major lessons learned to support future projects and close the knowledge gap. The use of renewable-energy sources has the potential to reduce research stations’ greenhouse gas emissions, making research in Antarctica more sustainable. The availability of high-quality energy is crucial for survival and to allow scientists to conduct meaningful research at research stations under harsh Antarctic conditions.

This paper examines the various pathways toward energy transition available to remote Arctic communities. Inhabitants of Arctic communities often face significant cost burdens due to high energy prices. Electricity costs are particularly high, due in part to the predominant use of diesel for electricity generation in over 80% of remote Arctic communities. This study examines the different approaches for integrating renewable energy sources, with a focus on the different strategies that might be implemented to finance the energy transition toward greater use of such renewable sources. The high costs associated with project realization in the remote Arctic present special challenges. This study uses a system dynamics model to evaluate the various financing tools available to facilitate the energy transition. The model results indicate that the integration of renewable energy sources has the potential to yield long-term electricity cost savings for the remote Arctic communities in question.

Currently, the dominant energy source for electricity generation in the Arctic is diesel, which is well proven for Arctic conditions. However, diesel is expensive in the Arctic, often due to long and complicated fuel transportation routes, and so inhabitants of Arctic communities can face high electricity costs. This paper investigates whether renewable energy resources can be harvested in a feasible and cost-competitive manner. The paper highlights which renewable energy resources are generally available in the Arctic and analyzes how renewable resources, such as hydropower, wind, and photovoltaics, can be used. Furthermore, we present three specific case studies to provide in-depth insight. A simulation with different energy generation scenarios using different renewable energy sources and penetration levels was performed for each case. The results indicate that renewables can be a cost-competitive option and that the optimal mix of renewables varies for different communities. Stakeholders and experts from the case study communities were also interviewed and their responses indicated a general acceptance of renewables.