Chuntao Jiang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Chuntao Jiang has a total of 18 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Hui Zhou
National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, CNPC Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, China
3 shared publications - Hanming Chen
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, CNPC Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China
2 shared publications - Hong Liu
Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266237, China
2 shared publications Zhonghui Yan
Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey
2 shared publications- Chuansheng Yang
Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266237, China
1 shared publication Hong Liu
Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 15 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 14 (10) , 914
Broadband Compensation Method for Marine Seismic Data Based on Adaptive Weight Fusion
With the continuous development of complex marine hydrocarbon reservoirs, broadband seismic data have shown growing advantages in revealing abundant stratigraphic information. Affected by acquisition conditions and stratigraphic attenuation, the acquired seismic data commonly suffer from narrow bandwidth, and conventional broadband processing techniques are incapable of optimizing the overall frequency band. This study proposes a coordinated high- and low-frequency broadband compensation method based on adaptive weight fusion to effectively extend the frequency bandwidth of seismic data. Firstly, wavefield separation is used to suppress ghost reflections, compensate low-frequency effective signals, and restore the continuity of the low-frequency spectrum. Then, based on the spectrum extrapolation method of maximum entropy spectrum estimation, a spectrum prediction model is established to achieve the continuation of high-frequency effective signals. Finally, in combination with the signal-to-noise ratio of each frequency band, the adaptive weight fusion algorithm is applied for weighted summation. The acquired broadband seismic data feature a continuous spectrum and balanced energy, greatly improving seismic imaging quality. Comparative results obtained using conventional processing methods verify that the proposed method can significantly improve stratigraphic continuity and wave group characteristics.
- 15 May 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 14 (10) , 914
Open AccessBroadband Compensation Method for Marine Seismic Data Based on Adaptive Weight Fusion
With the continuous development of complex marine hydrocarbon reservoirs, broadband seismic data have shown growing advantages in revealing abundant stratigraphic information. Affected by acquisition conditions and stratigraphic attenuation, the acquired seismic data commonly suffer from narrow bandwidth, and conventional broadband processing techniques are incapable of optimizing the overall frequency band. This study proposes a coordinated high- and low-frequency broadband compensation method based on adaptive weight fusion to effectively extend the frequency bandwidth of seismic data. Firstly, wavefield separation is used to suppress ghost reflections, compensate low-frequency effective signals, and restore the continuity of the low-frequency spectrum. Then, based on the spectrum extrapolation method of maximum entropy spectrum estimation, a spectrum prediction model is established to achieve the continuation of high-frequency effective signals. Finally, in combination with the signal-to-noise ratio of each frequency band, the adaptive weight fusion algorithm is applied for weighted summation. The acquired broadband seismic data feature a continuous spectrum and balanced energy, greatly improving seismic imaging quality. Comparative results obtained using conventional processing methods verify that the proposed method can significantly improve stratigraphic continuity and wave group characteristics.
- 18 August 2025
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Vol. 63 (01962892) , 1-15
An LSM–LBM Coupling Algorithm Based on the Inverse Squared Distance Method and Its Application in Seismic Wavefield Simulation
Research on seismic wave propagation in fluid-bearing reservoirs is crucial for unconventional oil and gas exploration. While traditional wave equation-based simulations are well-established, they often struggle to accurately model fluid-solid two-phase media characterized by complex tectonic features, strong discontinuities, and intricate interfacial couplings. This paper presents an advanced approach utilizing two mesoscopic discrete models: the lattice spring model (LSM) and the lattice Boltzmann model (LBM). The LSM simulates solid wavefields via the velocity Verlet algorithm, with optimized spatial distributions of springs and masses. Concurrently, the LBM is employed for fluid wavefield simulation, featuring a precisely designed lattice model and well-defined collision and streaming rules. In particular, a novel momentum exchange strategy incorporating the inverse squared distance method (ISDM) is constructed to enhance wavefield information transfer between the LSM and LBM at fluid-solid boundaries, aiming to improve accuracy and stability. The efficacy of the novel ISDM-LSM-LBM coupling algorithm is validated through simulations of layered models, fluid-filled cavity model, and river filling models. Compared to the original LSM-LBM algorithm, it exhibits enhanced computational accuracy and stability, albeit with a modest increase in computational burden and memory consumption. Comparative analysis with finite difference method (FDM) results reveals that the ISDM-LSM-LBM algorithm accurately captures wavefield characteristics. Although slight differences are observed in the depiction of reflected, transmitted, and converted waves at internal boundaries—attributable to the distinct fluid-solid interface treatments of each method—the new algorithm’s flexibility in boundary coupling and consideration of additional interaction forces offer significant improvements in accuracy and stability. This innovative simulation technique, independent of traditional wave equations, significantly enhances the precision and adaptability of wavefield calculations in fluid-solid media, providing substantial benefits for oil and gas geophysical exploration.
- 18 August 2025
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Vol. 63 (01962892) , 1-15
An LSM–LBM Coupling Algorithm Based on the Inverse Squared Distance Method and Its Application in Seismic Wavefield Simulation
Research on seismic wave propagation in fluid-bearing reservoirs is crucial for unconventional oil and gas exploration. While traditional wave equation-based simulations are well-established, they often struggle to accurately model fluid-solid two-phase media characterized by complex tectonic features, strong discontinuities, and intricate interfacial couplings. This paper presents an advanced approach utilizing two mesoscopic discrete models: the lattice spring model (LSM) and the lattice Boltzmann model (LBM). The LSM simulates solid wavefields via the velocity Verlet algorithm, with optimized spatial distributions of springs and masses. Concurrently, the LBM is employed for fluid wavefield simulation, featuring a precisely designed lattice model and well-defined collision and streaming rules. In particular, a novel momentum exchange strategy incorporating the inverse squared distance method (ISDM) is constructed to enhance wavefield information transfer between the LSM and LBM at fluid-solid boundaries, aiming to improve accuracy and stability. The efficacy of the novel ISDM-LSM-LBM coupling algorithm is validated through simulations of layered models, fluid-filled cavity model, and river filling models. Compared to the original LSM-LBM algorithm, it exhibits enhanced computational accuracy and stability, albeit with a modest increase in computational burden and memory consumption. Comparative analysis with finite difference method (FDM) results reveals that the ISDM-LSM-LBM algorithm accurately captures wavefield characteristics. Although slight differences are observed in the depiction of reflected, transmitted, and converted waves at internal boundaries—attributable to the distinct fluid-solid interface treatments of each method—the new algorithm’s flexibility in boundary coupling and consideration of additional interaction forces offer significant improvements in accuracy and stability. This innovative simulation technique, independent of traditional wave equations, significantly enhances the precision and adaptability of wavefield calculations in fluid-solid media, providing substantial benefits for oil and gas geophysical exploration.
- 5 December 2023
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Vol. 62 (01962892) , 1-12
Dispersion Analysis and 3-D Wavefield Modeling of Lattice Boltzmann Model
When the structure of the media is complex or there are strong interfaces, the simulated seismic waves obtained by the traditional forward modeling methods are often difficult to fit the real wavefields. To get more accurately simulated waves, in this paper, we utilize the widely used three-dimensional (3D) lattice Boltzmann model (LBM) in fluid mechanics as a new tool for seismic wavefield simulation. In order to establish a general framework for the LBM in the 3D case, firstly, we introduce an improved LBM scheme in 3D form considering the reflection and transmission effects. Then, we carry out a systematic dispersion analysis of the LBM with different lattices by analogizing the dispersion derivation of the finite-difference method (FDM), and comparing the results of the LBM with those of the FDM. Finally, we explore the stability conditions and present the treatment of initial and boundary conditions. To verify the feasibility of this 3D-LBM strategy, we perform 3D wavefield simulation tests on a homogeneous model, a cavity model, and a five-layer model, respectively. By comparing the results obtained by LBM and FDM, we conclude that the accuracy of this improved LBM scheme is acceptable. This 3D-LBM modeling scheme provides a new option for seismic wavefield simulation for complex media thanks to its flexibility of boundary processing and efficient parallelism capability.
- 5 December 2023
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Vol. 62 (01962892) , 1-12
Dispersion Analysis and 3-D Wavefield Modeling of Lattice Boltzmann Model
When the structure of the media is complex or there are strong interfaces, the simulated seismic waves obtained by the traditional forward modeling methods are often difficult to fit the real wavefields. To get more accurately simulated waves, in this paper, we utilize the widely used three-dimensional (3D) lattice Boltzmann model (LBM) in fluid mechanics as a new tool for seismic wavefield simulation. In order to establish a general framework for the LBM in the 3D case, firstly, we introduce an improved LBM scheme in 3D form considering the reflection and transmission effects. Then, we carry out a systematic dispersion analysis of the LBM with different lattices by analogizing the dispersion derivation of the finite-difference method (FDM), and comparing the results of the LBM with those of the FDM. Finally, we explore the stability conditions and present the treatment of initial and boundary conditions. To verify the feasibility of this 3D-LBM strategy, we perform 3D wavefield simulation tests on a homogeneous model, a cavity model, and a five-layer model, respectively. By comparing the results obtained by LBM and FDM, we conclude that the accuracy of this improved LBM scheme is acceptable. This 3D-LBM modeling scheme provides a new option for seismic wavefield simulation for complex media thanks to its flexibility of boundary processing and efficient parallelism capability.